Perceived Versus Actual Costs of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Rahel Dawit,Zachary Predmore,Julia Raifman,Philip A Chan,Lorraine T Dean
{"title":"Perceived Versus Actual Costs of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States.","authors":"Rahel Dawit,Zachary Predmore,Julia Raifman,Philip A Chan,Lorraine T Dean","doi":"10.1089/apc.2024.0145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) account for the highest proportion of HIV diagnoses in the United States, with daily pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) significantly reducing transmission risk. Since 2021, the Affordable Care Act rules have required PrEP and accompanying care visits to be free for most Americans; nevertheless, insurers have found ways to circumvent no-cost PrEP and some employers are receiving exemptions from including it in their formularies. Despite this, perceived costs and indirect expenses still hinder PrEP adoption. This study examines the differences between perceived and actual costs among GBMSM who have and have not used PrEP. We conducted a one-time online survey with 692 adults from six New England states between May 2020 and October 2021. Participants who had never used PrEP estimated its cost, while those with prior PrEP experience reported their actual expenses. Bivariate analysis and multi-variable logistic regression were used to assess the data. Results showed a 60% difference between perceived ($48) and actual ($30) median monthly costs. Higher perceived costs among nonusers were linked to race and income, while high actual costs for prior users were associated with insurance type, income, wealth, race, and self-rated consumer credit. This significant disparity in PrEP cost perceptions highlights the need for targeted outreach and messaging to improve PrEP uptake among at-risk populations who have not yet accessed it.","PeriodicalId":7476,"journal":{"name":"AIDS patient care and STDs","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS patient care and STDs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2024.0145","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) account for the highest proportion of HIV diagnoses in the United States, with daily pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) significantly reducing transmission risk. Since 2021, the Affordable Care Act rules have required PrEP and accompanying care visits to be free for most Americans; nevertheless, insurers have found ways to circumvent no-cost PrEP and some employers are receiving exemptions from including it in their formularies. Despite this, perceived costs and indirect expenses still hinder PrEP adoption. This study examines the differences between perceived and actual costs among GBMSM who have and have not used PrEP. We conducted a one-time online survey with 692 adults from six New England states between May 2020 and October 2021. Participants who had never used PrEP estimated its cost, while those with prior PrEP experience reported their actual expenses. Bivariate analysis and multi-variable logistic regression were used to assess the data. Results showed a 60% difference between perceived ($48) and actual ($30) median monthly costs. Higher perceived costs among nonusers were linked to race and income, while high actual costs for prior users were associated with insurance type, income, wealth, race, and self-rated consumer credit. This significant disparity in PrEP cost perceptions highlights the need for targeted outreach and messaging to improve PrEP uptake among at-risk populations who have not yet accessed it.
美国男同性恋、双性恋及其他男男性行为者对 HIV 暴露前预防的认知成本与实际成本。
在美国,男同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者(GBMSM)在艾滋病毒诊断中所占比例最高,而每日接触前预防疗法(PrEP)可大大降低传播风险。自 2021 年以来,《平价医疗法案》规定 PrEP 和随访对大多数美国人都是免费的;然而,保险公司已经找到了规避免费 PrEP 的方法,一些雇主也获得了豁免,不再将 PrEP 列入其处方中。尽管如此,感知成本和间接费用仍然阻碍着 PrEP 的采用。本研究探讨了已使用和未使用 PrEP 的 GBMSM 在感知成本和实际成本方面的差异。2020 年 5 月至 2021 年 10 月期间,我们对来自新英格兰六个州的 692 名成年人进行了一次性在线调查。从未使用过 PrEP 的参与者估算了其成本,而曾使用过 PrEP 的参与者则报告了其实际支出。评估数据时使用了双变量分析和多变量逻辑回归。结果显示,感知成本(48 美元)和实际成本(30 美元)的每月中位数相差 60%。非使用者的感知成本较高与种族和收入有关,而先前使用者的实际成本较高与保险类型、收入、财富、种族和自我评价的消费者信用有关。人们对 PrEP 费用的认知存在巨大差异,这凸显了有必要开展有针对性的宣传和信息传递活动,以提高尚未使用 PrEP 的高危人群对 PrEP 的使用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIDS patient care and STDs
AIDS patient care and STDs 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
22.40%
发文量
67
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: AIDS Patient Care and STDs is the foremost journal providing the latest developments and research in diagnostics and therapeutics designed to prolong the lifespan and improve quality of life for HIV/AIDS patients. The Journal delivers cutting-edge clinical, basic science, sociologic, and behavior-based investigations in HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections. Clinical trials, quantitative and qualitative analyses of pilot studies, comprehensive reviews, and case reports are presented from leading experts and scientists around the world. AIDS Patient Care and STDs coverage includes: Prominent AIDS medications, therapies, and antiretroviral agents HIV/AIDS-related diseases, infections, and complications Challenges of medication adherence Current prevention techniques for HIV The latest news and developments on other STDs Treatment/prevention options, including pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信