Leapfrogging Sycamore: Harnessing 1432 GPUs for 7× faster quantum random circuit sampling

IF 16.3 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Xian-He Zhao, Han-Sen Zhong, Feng Pan, Zi-Han Chen, Rong Fu, Zhongling Su, Xiaotong Xie, Chaoxing Zhao, Pan Zhang, Wanli Ouyang, Chao-Yang Lu, Jian-Wei Pan, Ming-Cheng Chen
{"title":"Leapfrogging Sycamore: Harnessing 1432 GPUs for 7× faster quantum random circuit sampling","authors":"Xian-He Zhao, Han-Sen Zhong, Feng Pan, Zi-Han Chen, Rong Fu, Zhongling Su, Xiaotong Xie, Chaoxing Zhao, Pan Zhang, Wanli Ouyang, Chao-Yang Lu, Jian-Wei Pan, Ming-Cheng Chen","doi":"10.1093/nsr/nwae317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Random quantum circuit sampling serves as a benchmark to demonstrate quantum computational advantage. Recent progress in classical algorithms, especially those based on tensor network methods, has significantly reduced the classical simulation time and challenged the claim of the first-generation quantum advantage experiments. However, in terms of generating uncorrelated samples, time-to-solution, and energy consumption, previous classical simulation experiments still underperform the Sycamore processor. Here we report an energy-efficient classical simulation algorithm, using 1432 GPUs to simulate quantum random circuit sampling which generates uncorrelated samples with higher linear cross entropy score and is 7 times faster than the Sycamore 53 qubits experiment. We propose a post-processing algorithm to reduce the overall complexity, and integrate state-of-the-art high-performance general-purpose GPU to achieve two orders of lower energy consumption compared to previous works. Our work provides the first unambiguous experimental evidence to refute Sycamore’s claim of quantum advantage, and redefines the boundary of quantum computational advantage using random circuit sampling.","PeriodicalId":18842,"journal":{"name":"National Science Review","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwae317","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Random quantum circuit sampling serves as a benchmark to demonstrate quantum computational advantage. Recent progress in classical algorithms, especially those based on tensor network methods, has significantly reduced the classical simulation time and challenged the claim of the first-generation quantum advantage experiments. However, in terms of generating uncorrelated samples, time-to-solution, and energy consumption, previous classical simulation experiments still underperform the Sycamore processor. Here we report an energy-efficient classical simulation algorithm, using 1432 GPUs to simulate quantum random circuit sampling which generates uncorrelated samples with higher linear cross entropy score and is 7 times faster than the Sycamore 53 qubits experiment. We propose a post-processing algorithm to reduce the overall complexity, and integrate state-of-the-art high-performance general-purpose GPU to achieve two orders of lower energy consumption compared to previous works. Our work provides the first unambiguous experimental evidence to refute Sycamore’s claim of quantum advantage, and redefines the boundary of quantum computational advantage using random circuit sampling.
跨越梧桐:利用 1432 个 GPU 实现 7 倍速量子随机电路采样
随机量子电路采样是证明量子计算优势的基准。经典算法的最新进展,尤其是基于张量网络方法的算法,大大缩短了经典模拟时间,对第一代量子优势实验的说法提出了挑战。然而,在生成不相关样本、求解时间和能耗方面,以前的经典模拟实验仍然不如 Sycamore 处理器。在这里,我们报告了一种高能效的经典模拟算法,使用 1432 GPU 模拟量子随机电路采样,该算法生成的非相关样本具有更高的线性交叉熵分,比 Sycamore 53 量子实验快 7 倍。我们提出了一种后处理算法来降低整体复杂性,并集成了最先进的高性能通用 GPU,从而实现了比以往工作低两个数量级的能耗。我们的工作首次提供了明确的实验证据,驳斥了 Sycamore 声称的量子优势,并利用随机电路采样重新定义了量子计算优势的边界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
National Science Review
National Science Review MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
24.10
自引率
1.90%
发文量
249
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: National Science Review (NSR; ISSN abbreviation: Natl. Sci. Rev.) is an English-language peer-reviewed multidisciplinary open-access scientific journal published by Oxford University Press under the auspices of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.According to Journal Citation Reports, its 2021 impact factor was 23.178. National Science Review publishes both review articles and perspectives as well as original research in the form of brief communications and research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信