{"title":"Electrochemical production of HO2- and O2 for sulfide removal from sewage","authors":"Jiaqi Hou, Yiming Li, Yanying He, Haixiao Guo, Yufen Wang, Tingting Zhu, Bing-Jie Ni, Yiwen Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, a comparative analysis of two electrochemical methods for sulfide control in sewer networks was performed for the first time. In addition, the mechanism of sulfide control by HO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup> was elucidated, and an analysis of the device operation and electrolyte selection was performed. The two-electron oxygen reduction reaction (2e<sup>-</sup>-ORR) using untreated gas diffusion electrode (GDE) was superior to the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) using stainless-steel mesh in terms of cell voltage, product formation, and sulfide suppression. The GDE maintained a stable HO₂⁻ production capacity, achieving a concentration of 4566.6 ± 173.3<!-- --> <!-- -->mg<!-- --> <!-- -->L⁻¹ with a current efficiency (CE) of 84.13 ± 3.5%. During the electrolysis period, a stable dissolved oxygen (DO) level in sewage was consistently observed due to continuous <em>in-situ</em> oxygen production in anode. HO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup> exhibited a notable increase in sewage pH (10.20±0.01), effectively inhibiting the release of 99.93% of sulfides. Moreover, the combined treatment of HO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup> and DO significantly surpassed that of individual treatments. Seawater treated with cation exchange resin (CER) emerged as the most promising alternative to freshwater as the electrolyte. Overall, this study demonstrates that in-situ generation of HO₂⁻ and oxygen is a more effective strategy for sulfide control in sewer systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":12,"journal":{"name":"ACS Chemical Health & Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Chemical Health & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this study, a comparative analysis of two electrochemical methods for sulfide control in sewer networks was performed for the first time. In addition, the mechanism of sulfide control by HO2- was elucidated, and an analysis of the device operation and electrolyte selection was performed. The two-electron oxygen reduction reaction (2e--ORR) using untreated gas diffusion electrode (GDE) was superior to the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) using stainless-steel mesh in terms of cell voltage, product formation, and sulfide suppression. The GDE maintained a stable HO₂⁻ production capacity, achieving a concentration of 4566.6 ± 173.3 mg L⁻¹ with a current efficiency (CE) of 84.13 ± 3.5%. During the electrolysis period, a stable dissolved oxygen (DO) level in sewage was consistently observed due to continuous in-situ oxygen production in anode. HO2- exhibited a notable increase in sewage pH (10.20±0.01), effectively inhibiting the release of 99.93% of sulfides. Moreover, the combined treatment of HO2- and DO significantly surpassed that of individual treatments. Seawater treated with cation exchange resin (CER) emerged as the most promising alternative to freshwater as the electrolyte. Overall, this study demonstrates that in-situ generation of HO₂⁻ and oxygen is a more effective strategy for sulfide control in sewer systems.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Health and Safety focuses on news, information, and ideas relating to issues and advances in chemical health and safety. The Journal of Chemical Health and Safety covers up-to-the minute, in-depth views of safety issues ranging from OSHA and EPA regulations to the safe handling of hazardous waste, from the latest innovations in effective chemical hygiene practices to the courts'' most recent rulings on safety-related lawsuits. The Journal of Chemical Health and Safety presents real-world information that health, safety and environmental professionals and others responsible for the safety of their workplaces can put to use right away, identifying potential and developing safety concerns before they do real harm.