{"title":"Electrochemical production of HO2- and O2 for sulfide removal from sewage","authors":"Jiaqi Hou, Yiming Li, Yanying He, Haixiao Guo, Yufen Wang, Tingting Zhu, Bing-Jie Ni, Yiwen Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, a comparative analysis of two electrochemical methods for sulfide control in sewer networks was performed for the first time. In addition, the mechanism of sulfide control by HO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup> was elucidated, and an analysis of the device operation and electrolyte selection was performed. The two-electron oxygen reduction reaction (2e<sup>-</sup>-ORR) using untreated gas diffusion electrode (GDE) was superior to the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) using stainless-steel mesh in terms of cell voltage, product formation, and sulfide suppression. The GDE maintained a stable HO₂⁻ production capacity, achieving a concentration of 4566.6 ± 173.3<!-- --> <!-- -->mg<!-- --> <!-- -->L⁻¹ with a current efficiency (CE) of 84.13 ± 3.5%. During the electrolysis period, a stable dissolved oxygen (DO) level in sewage was consistently observed due to continuous <em>in-situ</em> oxygen production in anode. HO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup> exhibited a notable increase in sewage pH (10.20±0.01), effectively inhibiting the release of 99.93% of sulfides. Moreover, the combined treatment of HO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup> and DO significantly surpassed that of individual treatments. Seawater treated with cation exchange resin (CER) emerged as the most promising alternative to freshwater as the electrolyte. Overall, this study demonstrates that in-situ generation of HO₂⁻ and oxygen is a more effective strategy for sulfide control in sewer systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135905","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this study, a comparative analysis of two electrochemical methods for sulfide control in sewer networks was performed for the first time. In addition, the mechanism of sulfide control by HO2- was elucidated, and an analysis of the device operation and electrolyte selection was performed. The two-electron oxygen reduction reaction (2e--ORR) using untreated gas diffusion electrode (GDE) was superior to the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) using stainless-steel mesh in terms of cell voltage, product formation, and sulfide suppression. The GDE maintained a stable HO₂⁻ production capacity, achieving a concentration of 4566.6 ± 173.3 mg L⁻¹ with a current efficiency (CE) of 84.13 ± 3.5%. During the electrolysis period, a stable dissolved oxygen (DO) level in sewage was consistently observed due to continuous in-situ oxygen production in anode. HO2- exhibited a notable increase in sewage pH (10.20±0.01), effectively inhibiting the release of 99.93% of sulfides. Moreover, the combined treatment of HO2- and DO significantly surpassed that of individual treatments. Seawater treated with cation exchange resin (CER) emerged as the most promising alternative to freshwater as the electrolyte. Overall, this study demonstrates that in-situ generation of HO₂⁻ and oxygen is a more effective strategy for sulfide control in sewer systems.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hazardous Materials serves as a global platform for promoting cutting-edge research in the field of Environmental Science and Engineering. Our publication features a wide range of articles, including full-length research papers, review articles, and perspectives, with the aim of enhancing our understanding of the dangers and risks associated with various materials concerning public health and the environment. It is important to note that the term "environmental contaminants" refers specifically to substances that pose hazardous effects through contamination, while excluding those that do not have such impacts on the environment or human health. Moreover, we emphasize the distinction between wastes and hazardous materials in order to provide further clarity on the scope of the journal. We have a keen interest in exploring specific compounds and microbial agents that have adverse effects on the environment.