Early twentieth-century recordings in higher music education: a preliminary analysis of the students’ views

IF 1 3区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Massimo Zicari, Michele Biasutti
{"title":"Early twentieth-century recordings in higher music education: a preliminary analysis of the students’ views","authors":"Massimo Zicari, Michele Biasutti","doi":"10.1017/s026505172400024x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines how classical music students understand early twentieth-century recordings in higher music education. A qualitative research method was chosen to investigate the beliefs and self-reported practices of 16 students enrolled in a European conservatoire, whose attitudes were considered through the administration of a semi-structured questionnaire and an interview. Their responses identified seven main themes: 1) beliefs, 2) sources, 3) self-reported practices, 4) repertoires/performers, 5) educational implications, 6) limits and 7) benefits. Results show how much students value early twentieth-century recordings – especially when it comes to analysing the performance practices of the past and developing new interpretations – and how articulate their responses can be with regard to specific stylistic and technical issues. However, possibly due to informal learning strategies and the lack of curricular teaching activities focusing on listening to and analysing recorded interpretations, some responses highlighted a misrepresentation of our recent musical past and the need for a more structured curricular activity. This last should benefit from a vast body of scholarly literature whose relevance is still underestimated among music practitioners.","PeriodicalId":54192,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Music Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Music Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s026505172400024x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines how classical music students understand early twentieth-century recordings in higher music education. A qualitative research method was chosen to investigate the beliefs and self-reported practices of 16 students enrolled in a European conservatoire, whose attitudes were considered through the administration of a semi-structured questionnaire and an interview. Their responses identified seven main themes: 1) beliefs, 2) sources, 3) self-reported practices, 4) repertoires/performers, 5) educational implications, 6) limits and 7) benefits. Results show how much students value early twentieth-century recordings – especially when it comes to analysing the performance practices of the past and developing new interpretations – and how articulate their responses can be with regard to specific stylistic and technical issues. However, possibly due to informal learning strategies and the lack of curricular teaching activities focusing on listening to and analysing recorded interpretations, some responses highlighted a misrepresentation of our recent musical past and the need for a more structured curricular activity. This last should benefit from a vast body of scholarly literature whose relevance is still underestimated among music practitioners.
高等音乐教育中的二十世纪早期录音:对学生观点的初步分析
本文探讨了古典音乐专业学生如何理解高等音乐教育中的二十世纪早期录音。文章采用定性研究方法,调查了欧洲一所音乐学院 16 名在校学生的信念和自述实践,并通过半结构式问卷调查和访谈了解了他们的态度。他们的回答确定了七大主题:1)信念;2)来源;3)自我报告的做法;4)剧目/表演者;5)教育意义;6)限制;7)益处。研究结果表明,学生们非常重视二十世纪早期的录音--尤其是在分析过去的演奏实践和发展新的诠释时--以及他们对特定风格和技术问题的反应是多么的清晰明了。然而,可能是由于非正式的学习策略,以及缺乏以聆听和分析录音诠释为重点的课程教学活动,一些答复强调了对我们近代音乐历史的错误描述,以及对更有条理的课程活动的需求。最后一个问题应从大量学术文献中获益,这些文献的相关性在音乐从业者中仍被低估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信