Initial Experience of Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Using the Hinotori Surgical Robot System

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Taisuke Tobe, Tomoaki Terakawa, Hideto Ueki, Takuto Hara, Yusuke Shiraishi, Naoto Wakita, Yasuyoshi Okamura, Kotaro Suzuki, Yukari Bando, Koji Chiba, Jun Teishima, Yuzo Nakano, Hideaki Miyake
{"title":"Initial Experience of Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Using the Hinotori Surgical Robot System","authors":"Taisuke Tobe,&nbsp;Tomoaki Terakawa,&nbsp;Hideto Ueki,&nbsp;Takuto Hara,&nbsp;Yusuke Shiraishi,&nbsp;Naoto Wakita,&nbsp;Yasuyoshi Okamura,&nbsp;Kotaro Suzuki,&nbsp;Yukari Bando,&nbsp;Koji Chiba,&nbsp;Jun Teishima,&nbsp;Yuzo Nakano,&nbsp;Hideaki Miyake","doi":"10.1002/rcs.2673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to investigate the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RLP) using the recently launched hinotori surgical robot system.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective study compared the perioperative outcomes of 11 consecutive patients who underwent RLP with the hinotori surgical robot system from October 2022 to March 2024 (hinotori group) and 30 consecutive patients who underwent RLP with the da Vinci system from March 2019 to September 2022 (da Vinci group).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The patient characteristics of the groups were similar. The median operative times in the hinotori and da Vinci groups were 236.0 and 231.5 min, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.480). The success rates were 100.0% and 96.7%, respectively (<i>p</i> = 1.000). Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 complications occurred in one patient (9.1%) in the hinotori group and one patient (3.3%) in the da Vinci group (<i>p</i> = 0.470).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The perioperative outcomes in the hinotori group were not inferior to those in the da Vinci group.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50311,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rcs.2673","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to investigate the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RLP) using the recently launched hinotori surgical robot system.

Methods

This retrospective study compared the perioperative outcomes of 11 consecutive patients who underwent RLP with the hinotori surgical robot system from October 2022 to March 2024 (hinotori group) and 30 consecutive patients who underwent RLP with the da Vinci system from March 2019 to September 2022 (da Vinci group).

Results

The patient characteristics of the groups were similar. The median operative times in the hinotori and da Vinci groups were 236.0 and 231.5 min, respectively (p = 0.480). The success rates were 100.0% and 96.7%, respectively (p = 1.000). Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 complications occurred in one patient (9.1%) in the hinotori group and one patient (3.3%) in the da Vinci group (p = 0.470).

Conclusions

The perioperative outcomes in the hinotori group were not inferior to those in the da Vinci group.

使用日之鸟手术机器人系统进行机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗输尿管盆腔交界处梗阻的初步经验
背景 本研究旨在探讨使用最近推出的 hinotori 手术机器人系统进行机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术(RLP)的围手术期疗效。 方法 这项回顾性研究比较了2022年10月至2024年3月期间使用hinotori手术机器人系统进行RLP的11例连续患者(hinotori组)和2019年3月至2022年9月期间使用达芬奇系统进行RLP的30例连续患者(达芬奇组)的围术期疗效。 结果 两组患者的特征相似。hinotori 组和达芬奇组的中位手术时间分别为 236.0 分钟和 231.5 分钟(p = 0.480)。成功率分别为100.0%和96.7%(p = 1.000)。hinotori 组和达芬奇组分别有一名患者(9.1%)和一名患者(3.3%)出现 Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 级并发症(p = 0.470)。 结论 hinotori组的围手术期结果并不比达芬奇组差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery provides a cross-disciplinary platform for presenting the latest developments in robotics and computer assisted technologies for medical applications. The journal publishes cutting-edge papers and expert reviews, complemented by commentaries, correspondence and conference highlights that stimulate discussion and exchange of ideas. Areas of interest include robotic surgery aids and systems, operative planning tools, medical imaging and visualisation, simulation and navigation, virtual reality, intuitive command and control systems, haptics and sensor technologies. In addition to research and surgical planning studies, the journal welcomes papers detailing clinical trials and applications of computer-assisted workflows and robotic systems in neurosurgery, urology, paediatric, orthopaedic, craniofacial, cardiovascular, thoraco-abdominal, musculoskeletal and visceral surgery. Articles providing critical analysis of clinical trials, assessment of the benefits and risks of the application of these technologies, commenting on ease of use, or addressing surgical education and training issues are also encouraged. The journal aims to foster a community that encompasses medical practitioners, researchers, and engineers and computer scientists developing robotic systems and computational tools in academic and commercial environments, with the intention of promoting and developing these exciting areas of medical technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信