Racism, not race: Quantitative analysis of the use of race and racism in the addiction literature

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
{"title":"Racism, not race: Quantitative analysis of the use of race and racism in the addiction literature","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale</h3><p>Prior research has demonstrated that medical journals rarely mention racism, potentially contributing to an incorrect understanding of and inappropriate interventions for health inequities affecting Black and Brown communities in the US. While this infrequency of mentions of racism has been documented in the general medical literature, it is unknown if this pattern extends to the addiction literature, where some have argued that structural racism has played a specific role in shaping policy and treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess how frequently the addiction literature for the last 30 years has mentioned race and racism and if these rates vary with social movements.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We created an algorithm to download and process over 30,000 published articles published from 1990 to 2022 in five major addiction journals: <em>Addiction</em>, <em>Addictive Behaviors, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Journal of Substance Abuse and Treatment,</em> and <em>International Journal of Drug Policy</em>. Using this data, we reported temporal patterns of mentioning both race and racism across journals and article types. Further, we utilized interrupted time series analysis to identify if the social movements against police violence and the murder of George Floyd in 2020 were associated with significant changes in rates of mentioning racism.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>While over 30% of the articles in addiction medicine journals included the word race, only 1.5% of articles mentioned racism. Based on an interrupted time series model, after the racial reckoning following the murder of George Floyd in 2020, mentions of racism increased in the addiction literature (OR = 3.21, 95% CI: [2.39, 4.32], <em>P&lt;</em>.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A large chasm remains between how often authors mention race versus racism in addiction medicine, a field with a unique history intertwined with structural racism. Addressing inequities in addiction outcomes, including burgeoning inequities in overdose deaths, will require acknowledging racism in the scientific literature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624007792","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale

Prior research has demonstrated that medical journals rarely mention racism, potentially contributing to an incorrect understanding of and inappropriate interventions for health inequities affecting Black and Brown communities in the US. While this infrequency of mentions of racism has been documented in the general medical literature, it is unknown if this pattern extends to the addiction literature, where some have argued that structural racism has played a specific role in shaping policy and treatment.

Objective

To assess how frequently the addiction literature for the last 30 years has mentioned race and racism and if these rates vary with social movements.

Methods

We created an algorithm to download and process over 30,000 published articles published from 1990 to 2022 in five major addiction journals: Addiction, Addictive Behaviors, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Journal of Substance Abuse and Treatment, and International Journal of Drug Policy. Using this data, we reported temporal patterns of mentioning both race and racism across journals and article types. Further, we utilized interrupted time series analysis to identify if the social movements against police violence and the murder of George Floyd in 2020 were associated with significant changes in rates of mentioning racism.

Results

While over 30% of the articles in addiction medicine journals included the word race, only 1.5% of articles mentioned racism. Based on an interrupted time series model, after the racial reckoning following the murder of George Floyd in 2020, mentions of racism increased in the addiction literature (OR = 3.21, 95% CI: [2.39, 4.32], P<.001).

Conclusions

A large chasm remains between how often authors mention race versus racism in addiction medicine, a field with a unique history intertwined with structural racism. Addressing inequities in addiction outcomes, including burgeoning inequities in overdose deaths, will require acknowledging racism in the scientific literature.

种族主义,而非种族:对成瘾文献中使用种族和种族主义的定量分析
理论依据先前的研究表明,医学期刊很少提及种族主义,这可能会导致人们对影响美国黑人和棕色人种社区的健康不平等现象的不正确理解和不恰当干预。虽然在一般医学文献中很少提及种族主义,但这种模式是否会延伸到成瘾文献中还不得而知,因为有些人认为结构性种族主义在制定政策和治疗方面发挥了特殊作用。方法我们创建了一种算法,下载并处理了五种主要成瘾期刊从 1990 年到 2022 年发表的 30,000 多篇文章:成瘾》、《成瘾行为》、《药物和酒精依赖》、《药物滥用与治疗杂志》和《国际药物政策杂志》。利用这些数据,我们报告了期刊和文章类型中提及种族和种族主义的时间模式。此外,我们还利用间断时间序列分析来确定 2020 年反对警察暴力的社会运动和乔治-弗洛伊德谋杀案是否与种族主义提及率的显著变化有关。结果虽然成瘾医学期刊中超过 30% 的文章包含种族一词,但只有 1.5% 的文章提及种族主义。根据间断时间序列模型,在2020年乔治-弗洛伊德被谋杀后的种族清算之后,成瘾文献中提及种族主义的文章有所增加(OR = 3.21,95% CI:[2.39, 4.32],P< .001)。结论在成瘾医学领域,作者提及种族与种族主义的频率之间仍存在巨大差距,而成瘾医学领域的独特历史与结构性种族主义交织在一起。要解决成瘾结果中的不平等问题,包括吸毒过量死亡中不断扩大的不平等问题,就需要在科学文献中承认种族主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信