Study on the bond-slip numerical simulation in the analysis of reinforced concrete wall-beam-slab joint under cyclic loading

IF 7.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
{"title":"Study on the bond-slip numerical simulation in the analysis of reinforced concrete wall-beam-slab joint under cyclic loading","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents the finite element analysis (FEA) of a full-scale RC wall-beam-slab joint under reversed cyclic loading. Five different approaches in ABAQUS are introduced to simulate the bond-slip effect between reinforcement and concrete. The concrete damaged plasticity (CDP) model and the combined hardening constitutive model are illustrated and adopted for concrete and reinforcement, respectively. By comparing the overall mechanical behavior of the wall-beam-slab joint predicted by FEA models to that of the test results, the predictive capability of FEA models with different bond-slip simulation methods are studied. In general, the analysis results indicate that the numerical results without the bond-slip effect present a gross overestimation of the overall mechanical behavior, while the numerical results with the bond-slip effect are in good agreement with the test results. Wherein, the FEA models with the bond-slip effect simulated by spring elements or implemented by user-defined subroutine predict more consistent results with the test results. Moreover, the disadvantages of each method utilized to simulate the bond-slip effect have also been described. A comprehensive study on material parameters of concrete is accomplished to obtain the influence of parameters such as the dilation angle(<em>ψ</em>), the ratio of the second stress invariant on the tensile meridian to that on the compressive meridian(K<sub>c</sub>), and the viscosity parameters(<em>υ</em>).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061824034081","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents the finite element analysis (FEA) of a full-scale RC wall-beam-slab joint under reversed cyclic loading. Five different approaches in ABAQUS are introduced to simulate the bond-slip effect between reinforcement and concrete. The concrete damaged plasticity (CDP) model and the combined hardening constitutive model are illustrated and adopted for concrete and reinforcement, respectively. By comparing the overall mechanical behavior of the wall-beam-slab joint predicted by FEA models to that of the test results, the predictive capability of FEA models with different bond-slip simulation methods are studied. In general, the analysis results indicate that the numerical results without the bond-slip effect present a gross overestimation of the overall mechanical behavior, while the numerical results with the bond-slip effect are in good agreement with the test results. Wherein, the FEA models with the bond-slip effect simulated by spring elements or implemented by user-defined subroutine predict more consistent results with the test results. Moreover, the disadvantages of each method utilized to simulate the bond-slip effect have also been described. A comprehensive study on material parameters of concrete is accomplished to obtain the influence of parameters such as the dilation angle(ψ), the ratio of the second stress invariant on the tensile meridian to that on the compressive meridian(Kc), and the viscosity parameters(υ).

循环荷载下钢筋混凝土墙-梁-板连接分析中的粘结-滑移数值模拟研究
本文介绍了在反向循环荷载作用下对全尺寸钢筋混凝土墙-梁-板连接进行的有限元分析(FEA)。在 ABAQUS 中引入了五种不同的方法来模拟钢筋与混凝土之间的粘结滑移效应。对混凝土和钢筋分别采用了混凝土损伤塑性(CDP)模型和组合硬化构成模型。通过将有限元分析模型预测的墙梁-楼板连接的整体力学行为与试验结果进行比较,研究了采用不同粘结滑移模拟方法的有限元分析模型的预测能力。总体而言,分析结果表明,无粘结滑移效应的数值结果严重高估了整体力学行为,而有粘结滑移效应的数值结果与测试结果吻合良好。其中,通过弹簧元素模拟粘结滑移效应或通过用户自定义子程序实现粘结滑移效应的有限元分析模型得出的结果与测试结果更为一致。此外,还介绍了每种模拟粘结滑移效应方法的缺点。对混凝土的材料参数进行了综合研究,以获得扩张角(ψ)、拉伸经线上的第二应力不变量与压缩经线上的第二应力不变量之比(Kc)以及粘度参数(υ)等参数的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Construction and Building Materials
Construction and Building Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
21.60%
发文量
3632
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged. Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信