Research on a novel universal low–load stable combustion technology

IF 9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
{"title":"Research on a novel universal low–load stable combustion technology","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2024.133223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Current swirl combustion technology with faulty coal lacks flexibility for peak shaving without aids, necessitating a novel low–load stable combustion technology. This paper presented such a technology, developed from gas–particle experiments, that did not require major modifications to the burner secondary air structure. The new technology was applied to a low NO<sub><em>x</em></sub> axial swirl burner (LNASB) in a 350 MW boiler and a vortex swirl burner (VSB) in a 700 MW boiler. Comparative analysis at 20 % boiler load showed both prototypes lacked recirculation zones, characterized by high primary air axial velocities and low turbulence intensity. After modification, LNASB became stable combustion LNASB (SLNSB), and VSB became stable combustion VSB (SVSB). SLNASB had a central recirculation zone, while SVSB had a large annular recirculation zone. The relative length and diameter of SLNASB's recirculation zone were 0.7 and 0.472, while for SVSB, they were 1.5 and 0.477. LNASB had a diffusion angle of 4.7° and a swirl number of 0.511; SLNASB had 29.7° and 0.695; VSB had 11.4° and 0.445; SVSB had 33.3° and 0.784. The turbulence intensity of SLNASB and SVSB were notably higher than their prototypes. High–concentration particles accumulated at the center of SLNASB and SVSB, then entered the recirculation zone.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11647,"journal":{"name":"Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224029980","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current swirl combustion technology with faulty coal lacks flexibility for peak shaving without aids, necessitating a novel low–load stable combustion technology. This paper presented such a technology, developed from gas–particle experiments, that did not require major modifications to the burner secondary air structure. The new technology was applied to a low NOx axial swirl burner (LNASB) in a 350 MW boiler and a vortex swirl burner (VSB) in a 700 MW boiler. Comparative analysis at 20 % boiler load showed both prototypes lacked recirculation zones, characterized by high primary air axial velocities and low turbulence intensity. After modification, LNASB became stable combustion LNASB (SLNSB), and VSB became stable combustion VSB (SVSB). SLNASB had a central recirculation zone, while SVSB had a large annular recirculation zone. The relative length and diameter of SLNASB's recirculation zone were 0.7 and 0.472, while for SVSB, they were 1.5 and 0.477. LNASB had a diffusion angle of 4.7° and a swirl number of 0.511; SLNASB had 29.7° and 0.695; VSB had 11.4° and 0.445; SVSB had 33.3° and 0.784. The turbulence intensity of SLNASB and SVSB were notably higher than their prototypes. High–concentration particles accumulated at the center of SLNASB and SVSB, then entered the recirculation zone.

新型通用低负荷稳定燃烧技术研究
目前使用劣质煤的漩涡燃烧技术缺乏灵活性,无法在不使用辅助设备的情况下削峰填谷,因此需要一种新型的低负荷稳定燃烧技术。本文介绍了根据气体-颗粒实验开发的这种技术,它不需要对燃烧器二次风结构进行重大修改。新技术应用于 350 兆瓦锅炉中的低氮氧化物轴流漩涡燃烧器 (LNASB) 和 700 兆瓦锅炉中的涡流漩涡燃烧器 (VSB)。在 20% 锅炉负荷下进行的比较分析表明,这两种原型都缺少再循环区,其特点是一次风轴向速度高,湍流强度低。改造后,LNASB 变成了稳燃 LNASB(SLNSB),VSB 变成了稳燃 VSB(SVSB)。SLNASB 有一个中央再循环区,而 SVSB 有一个大的环形再循环区。SLNASB 再循环区的相对长度和直径分别为 0.7 和 0.472,而 SVSB 的相对长度和直径分别为 1.5 和 0.477。LNASB 的扩散角为 4.7°,漩涡数为 0.511;SLNASB 的扩散角为 29.7°,漩涡数为 0.695;VSB 的扩散角为 11.4°,漩涡数为 0.445;SVSB 的扩散角为 33.3°,漩涡数为 0.784。SLNASB 和 SVSB 的湍流强度明显高于其原型。高浓度颗粒在 SLNASB 和 SVSB 的中心聚集,然后进入再循环区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy
Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy is a multidisciplinary, international journal that publishes research and analysis in the field of energy engineering. Our aim is to become a leading peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of information for energy-related topics. The journal covers a range of areas including mechanical engineering, thermal sciences, and energy analysis. We are particularly interested in research on energy modelling, prediction, integrated energy systems, planning, and management. Additionally, we welcome papers on energy conservation, efficiency, biomass and bioenergy, renewable energy, electricity supply and demand, energy storage, buildings, and economic and policy issues. These topics should align with our broader multidisciplinary focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信