Bee sensitivity derived from acute contact tests biased by standardised protocols?

IF 6.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
{"title":"Bee sensitivity derived from acute contact tests biased by standardised protocols?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.117062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In an acute contact test with bees the compound of interest is dissolved in a carrier solvent (frequently acetone) and then a droplet of the solution is placed on the dorsal thorax of the bee. The volume of the droplet is standardised to 1 µL for honeybees and to 2 µL for bumblebees. In practice the same droplet volume is used for bees with very different sizes. In this research the effect of the droplet volume was evaluated with acute contact tests with dimethoate for the alfalfa leafcutter bee, the red mason bee, the honeybee and the bumblebee. The results were analysed with a ToxicoKinetic ToxicoDynamic (TKTD) model to separate kinetic from dynamic effects. This allows to compare the sensitivity of the bee based on the effect threshold and not on the time, species and test dependent LD<sub>50</sub>s. The analysis of the test results indicates that the magnitude of the response of the bees increased with increasing droplet size. The results also showed that the manifestation of effects over time is slower for the red mason bee and the bumblebee compared to the honeybee and the alfalfa leafcutter bee. This implies that the result of a 2 day test with a fixed dosing volume results in different response for a bumblebee compared to the alfalfa leafcutter bee, not because of different sensitivities of the bees involved but due to the difference of relative dosed surface ratio. So comparing the sensitivity of bee species, based on standardised tests is biased and amplifies the sensitivity for the smaller bee species.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":303,"journal":{"name":"Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651324011382/pdfft?md5=14b7f71d5a955284d51fbbf9ee8017e6&pid=1-s2.0-S0147651324011382-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651324011382","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In an acute contact test with bees the compound of interest is dissolved in a carrier solvent (frequently acetone) and then a droplet of the solution is placed on the dorsal thorax of the bee. The volume of the droplet is standardised to 1 µL for honeybees and to 2 µL for bumblebees. In practice the same droplet volume is used for bees with very different sizes. In this research the effect of the droplet volume was evaluated with acute contact tests with dimethoate for the alfalfa leafcutter bee, the red mason bee, the honeybee and the bumblebee. The results were analysed with a ToxicoKinetic ToxicoDynamic (TKTD) model to separate kinetic from dynamic effects. This allows to compare the sensitivity of the bee based on the effect threshold and not on the time, species and test dependent LD50s. The analysis of the test results indicates that the magnitude of the response of the bees increased with increasing droplet size. The results also showed that the manifestation of effects over time is slower for the red mason bee and the bumblebee compared to the honeybee and the alfalfa leafcutter bee. This implies that the result of a 2 day test with a fixed dosing volume results in different response for a bumblebee compared to the alfalfa leafcutter bee, not because of different sensitivities of the bees involved but due to the difference of relative dosed surface ratio. So comparing the sensitivity of bee species, based on standardised tests is biased and amplifies the sensitivity for the smaller bee species.

从急性接触试验中得出的灵敏度是否会因标准化方案而产生偏差?
在蜜蜂急性接触试验中,将相关化合物溶解在载体溶剂(通常是丙酮)中,然后将溶液滴在蜜蜂的背胸上。蜜蜂的液滴体积标准化为 1 µL,大黄蜂的液滴体积标准化为 2 µL。在实践中,相同的液滴体积可用于不同体型的蜜蜂。在这项研究中,通过对苜蓿叶蜂、红石匠蜂、蜜蜂和熊蜂进行二甲戊乐灵急性接触试验,对液滴体积的影响进行了评估。使用毒性动力学毒性动力学(TKTD)模型对结果进行了分析,以区分动力学效应和动态效应。这样就可以根据效应阈值而不是时间、物种和试验相关半数致死剂量来比较蜜蜂的敏感性。对试验结果的分析表明,蜜蜂的反应幅度随着液滴大小的增加而增大。结果还表明,与蜜蜂和苜蓿切叶蜂相比,赤石蜂和大黄蜂的效应随时间的推移表现得较慢。这意味着,与苜蓿切叶蜂相比,大黄蜂在固定剂量下的 2 天试验结果会产生不同的反应,这并不是因为蜜蜂的敏感性不同,而是因为相对剂量表面比率不同。因此,根据标准化测试来比较蜂种的敏感性是有偏差的,会放大较小蜂种的敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
1234
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety is a multi-disciplinary journal that focuses on understanding the exposure and effects of environmental contamination on organisms including human health. The scope of the journal covers three main themes. The topics within these themes, indicated below, include (but are not limited to) the following: Ecotoxicology、Environmental Chemistry、Environmental Safety etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信