The ability of decline in intrinsic capacity to indicate the risk of mortality in older adults: A meta-analysis

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
{"title":"The ability of decline in intrinsic capacity to indicate the risk of mortality in older adults: A meta-analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.108109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the ability of decline in intrinsic capacity to indicate the risk of mortality in older adults.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Wanfang Database, CNKI, VIP, and CBM were searched for relevant studies published from inception to October 31, 2023. Stata17.0 software was used to perform the meta-analysis. A random effects model was used to pool the results of the risk of mortality (as hazard ratios, HRs) in older adults and decline in intrinsic capacity. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of studies. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to determine the confidence in the estimated effect of pooled outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twelve studies, with a total of 38,531 participants, were included in this meta-analysis. The findings show that older adults with intrinsic capacity decline have a higher risk of mortality (HR = 1.11, 95 % CI 1.08–1.14, <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 95.9 %, <em>P</em>&lt;0.001) than older adults with normal intrinsic capacity. The pooled HR estimates for the locomotion, vitality, and cognitive dimensions of intrinsic capacity in the prediction of mortality were 0.89 (HR = 0.89, 95%CI 0.83–0.96, <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 41.3 %, <em>P</em> = 0.146), 0.76 (HR = 0.98, 95 % CI 0.59–0.97, <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 60.8 %, <em>P</em> = 0.078), and 0.99 (HR = 0.99, 95 % CI 0.98–1.00, <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.0 %, <em>P</em> = 0.664), respectively. The pooled HR estimates of the psychological dimension to predict mortality were not statistically significant (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). GRADE evaluations of outcome indicators were of moderate confidence.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Decline in intrinsic capacity is a significant predictor of mortality. Locomotion, vitality, and cognition dimensions can all predict mortality. Clinical personnel should early assess the intrinsic capacity of older adults, focusing on changes in the dimensions of locomotion and vitality, to identify the risk of mortality, avoid adverse health outcomes, and improve the quality of life of older adults.</p><p>Review protocol registered in PROSPERO: CRD42023481246</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51120,"journal":{"name":"Maturitas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maturitas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378512224002044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the ability of decline in intrinsic capacity to indicate the risk of mortality in older adults.

Design

Meta-analysis.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Wanfang Database, CNKI, VIP, and CBM were searched for relevant studies published from inception to October 31, 2023. Stata17.0 software was used to perform the meta-analysis. A random effects model was used to pool the results of the risk of mortality (as hazard ratios, HRs) in older adults and decline in intrinsic capacity. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of studies. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to determine the confidence in the estimated effect of pooled outcomes.

Results

Twelve studies, with a total of 38,531 participants, were included in this meta-analysis. The findings show that older adults with intrinsic capacity decline have a higher risk of mortality (HR = 1.11, 95 % CI 1.08–1.14, I2 = 95.9 %, P<0.001) than older adults with normal intrinsic capacity. The pooled HR estimates for the locomotion, vitality, and cognitive dimensions of intrinsic capacity in the prediction of mortality were 0.89 (HR = 0.89, 95%CI 0.83–0.96, I2 = 41.3 %, P = 0.146), 0.76 (HR = 0.98, 95 % CI 0.59–0.97, I2 = 60.8 %, P = 0.078), and 0.99 (HR = 0.99, 95 % CI 0.98–1.00, I2 = 0.0 %, P = 0.664), respectively. The pooled HR estimates of the psychological dimension to predict mortality were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). GRADE evaluations of outcome indicators were of moderate confidence.

Conclusions

Decline in intrinsic capacity is a significant predictor of mortality. Locomotion, vitality, and cognition dimensions can all predict mortality. Clinical personnel should early assess the intrinsic capacity of older adults, focusing on changes in the dimensions of locomotion and vitality, to identify the risk of mortality, avoid adverse health outcomes, and improve the quality of life of older adults.

Review protocol registered in PROSPERO: CRD42023481246

内在能力下降对老年人死亡风险的指示能力:荟萃分析
方法在PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、万方数据库、CNKI、VIP和CBM中检索从开始到2023年10月31日发表的相关研究。使用Stata17.0软件进行荟萃分析。采用随机效应模型对老年人的死亡风险(以危险比表示,HRs)和内在能力下降的结果进行汇总。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量。采用建议、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)系统确定汇总结果估计效应的置信度。结果本荟萃分析纳入了 12 项研究,共有 38,531 人参与。结果显示,与内在能力正常的老年人相比,内在能力下降的老年人的死亡风险更高(HR = 1.11,95 % CI 1.08-1.14,I2 = 95.9 %,P<0.001)。运动、活力和认知方面的内在能力在预测死亡率方面的综合 HR 估计值为 0.89(HR = 0.89,95%CI 0.83-0.96,I2 = 41.3 %,P = 0.146)、0.76(HR = 0.98,95 % CI 0.59-0.97,I2 = 60.8 %,P = 0.078)和 0.99(HR = 0.99,95 % CI 0.98-1.00,I2 = 0.0 %,P = 0.664)。心理维度预测死亡率的汇总 HR 估计值无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论内在能力下降是预测死亡率的重要指标。运动、活力和认知能力均可预测死亡率。临床人员应及早评估老年人的内在能力,重点关注运动和活力方面的变化,以识别死亡风险、避免不良健康后果并提高老年人的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Maturitas
Maturitas 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
142
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Maturitas is an international multidisciplinary peer reviewed scientific journal of midlife health and beyond publishing original research, reviews, consensus statements and guidelines, and mini-reviews. The journal provides a forum for all aspects of postreproductive health in both genders ranging from basic science to health and social care. Topic areas include:• Aging• Alternative and Complementary medicines• Arthritis and Bone Health• Cancer• Cardiovascular Health• Cognitive and Physical Functioning• Epidemiology, health and social care• Gynecology/ Reproductive Endocrinology• Nutrition/ Obesity Diabetes/ Metabolic Syndrome• Menopause, Ovarian Aging• Mental Health• Pharmacology• Sexuality• Quality of Life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信