Integrating stakeholder value network with strategic issue management for multi-stakeholder needs and requirements analysis of vertical farming systems
{"title":"Integrating stakeholder value network with strategic issue management for multi-stakeholder needs and requirements analysis of vertical farming systems","authors":"Yongbing Feng, Guohua Gao, Pengyu Wang, Zihua Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><p>Vertical Farming Systems (VFSs) are considered an evolutionary jump in humanity's quest for a reliable, sustainable and healthier food supply, and their design and implementation require bringing multi-stakeholder together to achieve values co-creation. However, there is a lack of the qualitative and quantitative analysis from the perspective of multi-stakeholder's value exchange to explain the complex need relationships among related VFSs and their multi-stakeholder and a lack of the research on VFSs needs (VFSs-N) from the strategic issues view to consider the balance of conflicting needs.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>To transform stakeholder needs into stakeholder requirements and capture the comprehensive and consistent VFSs requirements (VFSs-R) list.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>This paper proposes an approach integrating stakeholder value network (SVN) and strategic issue management (SIM). This study offers a systematic framework to get a VFSs-R list. The SVN is employed for structuring a four-step needs analysis process and viewing multi-stakeholder direct and indirect need relationships as value exchanges for qualitative and quantitative analysis. Integration of stakeholder relationships and SIM is presented to reveal additional insights into the balance of conflicting VFSs-N and reduce the dimensionality of the complex relationships in SVN by issue networks (IN). In addition, based on the above analysis results, needs-to-requirements transformation can be achieved by adding identity (ID), name, description, and rationale.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>When the framework was applied to the multi-stakeholder needs and requirements analysis of the Robotic Vertical Farming Systems (RVFS) project. We can get 52 needs including 3 conflicting needs and eventually analyse and balance the needs to get a RVFS-R list of 13 well-formed and prioritized requirements.</p></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><p>These research results can help the designer identify the relatively more important requirements, whether direct or indirect, and assist the VFSs projects achieve value co-creation among stakeholders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 104133"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X2400283X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
CONTEXT
Vertical Farming Systems (VFSs) are considered an evolutionary jump in humanity's quest for a reliable, sustainable and healthier food supply, and their design and implementation require bringing multi-stakeholder together to achieve values co-creation. However, there is a lack of the qualitative and quantitative analysis from the perspective of multi-stakeholder's value exchange to explain the complex need relationships among related VFSs and their multi-stakeholder and a lack of the research on VFSs needs (VFSs-N) from the strategic issues view to consider the balance of conflicting needs.
OBJECTIVE
To transform stakeholder needs into stakeholder requirements and capture the comprehensive and consistent VFSs requirements (VFSs-R) list.
METHODS
This paper proposes an approach integrating stakeholder value network (SVN) and strategic issue management (SIM). This study offers a systematic framework to get a VFSs-R list. The SVN is employed for structuring a four-step needs analysis process and viewing multi-stakeholder direct and indirect need relationships as value exchanges for qualitative and quantitative analysis. Integration of stakeholder relationships and SIM is presented to reveal additional insights into the balance of conflicting VFSs-N and reduce the dimensionality of the complex relationships in SVN by issue networks (IN). In addition, based on the above analysis results, needs-to-requirements transformation can be achieved by adding identity (ID), name, description, and rationale.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
When the framework was applied to the multi-stakeholder needs and requirements analysis of the Robotic Vertical Farming Systems (RVFS) project. We can get 52 needs including 3 conflicting needs and eventually analyse and balance the needs to get a RVFS-R list of 13 well-formed and prioritized requirements.
SIGNIFICANCE
These research results can help the designer identify the relatively more important requirements, whether direct or indirect, and assist the VFSs projects achieve value co-creation among stakeholders.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments.
The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas:
Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making;
The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment;
Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems;
Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.