The Langmuir-Blodgett trough (Langmuir film balance) can be used to understand the stabilizer concentrations in aqueous nano- and microsuspensions

Abstract

Aqueous suspensions of poorly soluble, crystalline drug particles in the sub-micron range hold the ability to regulate the drug release for a defined period of time after e.g., intramuscular, or subcutaneous administration, working as an eminent formulation strategy for the preparation of long-acting injectables. Aqueous suspensions are typically prepared by top-down approaches, e.g., wet bead media milling or high-pressure homogenization, containing the active pharmaceutical compound and surfactants and/or polymers for stabilization purposes. Currently, the screening of proper stabilizers and adequate stabilizer concentration during formulation investigations is based on a trial-and-error approach with variations in combinations, concentrations, and/or ratios. To obtain a more efficient methodology during formulation screening, the present study investigated the correlation between the surface activity of two different surfactants, i.e., poloxamer 188 and polysorbate 20, by drop profile tensiometry and Langmuir trough monolayer, and the obtained sizes of cinnarizine particles as a tool to predict the optimal surfactant concentration to prepare physical stable nano- and microsuspensions. The obtained results demonstrated that the molecular area determined as the area per surfactant molecule measured in the Langmuir trough combined with the specific surface area of the prepared suspensions could be used to predict the suitable concentration of the surfactant based upon short-term stress stability data. The results further showed that higher concentrations of poloxamer 188 were necessary to stabilize the suspensions when compared to the needed concentration of polysorbate 20. In addition, it was observed that there was a need for a slightly higher surfactant concentration when the suspensions were milled with the smallest bead size of 0.5 mm instead of larger sizes of bead (0.8 and 1.0 mm), which could not be accounted for by differences in specific surface area.