Qualiy of life in displaced earthquake survivors

IF 2.6 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Lucia Savadori , Daniela Di Bucci , Mauro Dolce , Alessandro Galvagni , Alessia Patacca , Elena Pezzi , Giuseppe Scurci , Fabio Del Missier
{"title":"Qualiy of life in displaced earthquake survivors","authors":"Lucia Savadori ,&nbsp;Daniela Di Bucci ,&nbsp;Mauro Dolce ,&nbsp;Alessandro Galvagni ,&nbsp;Alessia Patacca ,&nbsp;Elena Pezzi ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Scurci ,&nbsp;Fabio Del Missier","doi":"10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>We investigated Quality of Life (QOL) in a sample of individuals (<em>n</em> = 341) who experienced different consequences in terms of displacement from their house after earthquake.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Three groups were studied: those who had been displaced but are no longer so, those still displaced, and those who were never displaced. QOL for four time points was assessed: pre-earthquake, during displacement, at the time of the survey, and in ten years.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Different trajectories of QOL were observed in the three groups: not displaced individuals showed no significant variation, those who were displaced had a significant decline in QOL after the earthquake but a significant recovery after the displacement experience, and those who were still displaced at the time of the survey reported lowest QOL both after the earthquake and in the future, with no recovery. Predictors of perceived QOL decline were quality and type of temporary accommodation, place attachment, and perceived health impairment. Subsequent QOL perceived improvement was predicted by quality and type of temporary accommodation, risk awareness, and emotional well-being.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Our findings highlight the importance of minimizing the duration of temporary displacement and providing high-quality temporary accommodations, considering individual needs in the local contexts and communities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52341,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Disaster Science","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100371"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061724000619/pdfft?md5=5d361f35cfc4d22906037d653d3f6a95&pid=1-s2.0-S2590061724000619-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Disaster Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061724000619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

We investigated Quality of Life (QOL) in a sample of individuals (n = 341) who experienced different consequences in terms of displacement from their house after earthquake.

Methods

Three groups were studied: those who had been displaced but are no longer so, those still displaced, and those who were never displaced. QOL for four time points was assessed: pre-earthquake, during displacement, at the time of the survey, and in ten years.

Results

Different trajectories of QOL were observed in the three groups: not displaced individuals showed no significant variation, those who were displaced had a significant decline in QOL after the earthquake but a significant recovery after the displacement experience, and those who were still displaced at the time of the survey reported lowest QOL both after the earthquake and in the future, with no recovery. Predictors of perceived QOL decline were quality and type of temporary accommodation, place attachment, and perceived health impairment. Subsequent QOL perceived improvement was predicted by quality and type of temporary accommodation, risk awareness, and emotional well-being.

Discussion

Our findings highlight the importance of minimizing the duration of temporary displacement and providing high-quality temporary accommodations, considering individual needs in the local contexts and communities.

流离失所的地震幸存者的生活质量
方法研究了三组人:曾经流离失所但现在已不再流离失所的人、仍然流离失所的人和从未流离失所的人。结果在三个组别中观察到了不同的 QOL 轨迹:未流离失所者的 QOL 没有显著变化;流离失所者的 QOL 在地震后显著下降,但在经历流离失所后显著恢复;在调查时仍流离失所者的 QOL 在地震后和未来均为最低,且没有恢复。感知到的 QOL 下降的预测因素包括临时住所的质量和类型、对地方的依恋以及感知到的健康损害。我们的研究结果突出表明,考虑到当地环境和社区的个人需求,尽量缩短临时流离失所的时间和提供高质量的临时住所非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Progress in Disaster Science
Progress in Disaster Science Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
51
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Disaster Science is a Gold Open Access journal focusing on integrating research and policy in disaster research, and publishes original research papers and invited viewpoint articles on disaster risk reduction; response; emergency management and recovery. A key part of the Journal's Publication output will see key experts invited to assess and comment on the current trends in disaster research, as well as highlight key papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信