Humoral response to anti SARS-CoV2 vaccination at one and seven months is not different in shift workers and non-shift workers

IF 3.7 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
{"title":"Humoral response to anti SARS-CoV2 vaccination at one and seven months is not different in shift workers and non-shift workers","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bbih.2024.100869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since previous studies, mostly performed in healthy adults, show that sleep restriction around time of vaccination impairs antibody response and shift work affects sleep, aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that the antibody response to vaccination is impaired in shift workers, when compared to non-shift workers.</p><p>Employees (n = 445; mean age 44 ± 11 years; 35 % men) of the Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS (Milan, Italy) were vaccinated against SARS-CoV2 in February 2021 with an mRNA-based vaccine. Antibody titers were assayed 1 and 7 months later. Differences between groups were assessed using ANOVA, after log-transformation of variables with right-skewed distribution.</p><p>We report that the antibody titer was significantly higher in shift workers (33 % of employees) compared to non-shift workers at first assay [median (IQR): 2495 (1700; 4665) <em>vs</em> 2060 (1619; 2970) BAU/mL, p = 0.0123], as well as at the second one, and that this difference was abolished after adjustment for previous development of symptomatic COVID-19. Results were not affected by age or sex at birth.</p><p>These results show that shift workers were able to mount an unimpaired antibody response to vaccination. Since vaccinations were performed during the pandemic urgency, our retrospective study has several limitations, nevertheless it underlines the need for large prospective, controlled studies on the effects of acute and chronic sleep restriction on response to vaccination in the general population and on the impact of shift work on immune response.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72454,"journal":{"name":"Brain, behavior, & immunity - health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666354624001479/pdfft?md5=91bdec778d8029b6b25f4fdb85a40897&pid=1-s2.0-S2666354624001479-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain, behavior, & immunity - health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666354624001479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since previous studies, mostly performed in healthy adults, show that sleep restriction around time of vaccination impairs antibody response and shift work affects sleep, aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that the antibody response to vaccination is impaired in shift workers, when compared to non-shift workers.

Employees (n = 445; mean age 44 ± 11 years; 35 % men) of the Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS (Milan, Italy) were vaccinated against SARS-CoV2 in February 2021 with an mRNA-based vaccine. Antibody titers were assayed 1 and 7 months later. Differences between groups were assessed using ANOVA, after log-transformation of variables with right-skewed distribution.

We report that the antibody titer was significantly higher in shift workers (33 % of employees) compared to non-shift workers at first assay [median (IQR): 2495 (1700; 4665) vs 2060 (1619; 2970) BAU/mL, p = 0.0123], as well as at the second one, and that this difference was abolished after adjustment for previous development of symptomatic COVID-19. Results were not affected by age or sex at birth.

These results show that shift workers were able to mount an unimpaired antibody response to vaccination. Since vaccinations were performed during the pandemic urgency, our retrospective study has several limitations, nevertheless it underlines the need for large prospective, controlled studies on the effects of acute and chronic sleep restriction on response to vaccination in the general population and on the impact of shift work on immune response.

轮班工人和非轮班工人在接种抗 SARS-CoV2 疫苗 1 个月和 7 个月后的体液反应没有差异
该研究的目的是验证一个假设,即与非轮班工作者相比,轮班工作者对接种疫苗的抗体反应会受到影响。2021年2月,意大利米兰IRCCS蒙齐诺心脏病学中心的员工(n = 445;平均年龄44 ± 11岁;35%为男性)接种了基于mRNA的SARS-CoV2疫苗。1 个月和 7 个月后对抗体滴度进行了检测。我们的报告显示,与非轮班工人相比,轮班工人(占员工总数的 33%)在第一次检测时的抗体滴度明显更高[中位数(IQR):2495 (1700; 4665) vs 2060 (1619; 2970) BAU/mL,p = 0.0123],在第二次检测时也是如此。这些结果表明,轮班工人能够对疫苗接种产生无损害的抗体反应。由于疫苗接种是在大流行的紧急时期进行的,因此我们的回顾性研究存在一些局限性,但它强调了就急性和慢性睡眠限制对普通人群疫苗接种反应的影响以及轮班工作对免疫反应的影响进行大型前瞻性对照研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain, behavior, & immunity - health
Brain, behavior, & immunity - health Biological Psychiatry, Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
97 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信