Process-based forecasts of lake water temperature and dissolved oxygen outperform null models, with variability over time and depth

IF 5.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Whitney M. Woelmer , R. Quinn Thomas , Freya Olsson , Bethel G. Steele , Kathleen C. Weathers , Cayelan C. Carey
{"title":"Process-based forecasts of lake water temperature and dissolved oxygen outperform null models, with variability over time and depth","authors":"Whitney M. Woelmer ,&nbsp;R. Quinn Thomas ,&nbsp;Freya Olsson ,&nbsp;Bethel G. Steele ,&nbsp;Kathleen C. Weathers ,&nbsp;Cayelan C. Carey","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Near-term iterative ecological forecasting has great potential for providing new insights into our ability to predict multiple ecological variables. However, true, out-of-sample probabilistic forecasts remain rare, and variability in forecast performance has largely been unexamined in process-based forecasts which predict multiple ecosystem variables. To explore how forecast performance varies for water temperature and dissolved oxygen, two freshwater variables important for lake ecosystem functioning, we produced probabilistic forecasts at multiple depths over two open-water seasons in Lake Sunapee, NH, USA. Our forecasting system, FLARE (Forecasting Lake And Reservoir Ecosystems), uses a 1-D coupled hydrodynamic-biogeochemical process model, which we assessed relative to both climatology and persistence null models to quantify how much information process-based FLARE forecasts provide over null models across varying environmental conditions. We found that FLARE water temperature forecasts were always more skillful than FLARE oxygen forecasts. Specifically, temperature forecasts outperformed both null models up to 11 days into the future, as compared to only two days for oxygen. Across different years, we observed variable forecast skill, with performance generally decreasing with depth for both variables. Overall, all temperature forecasts and surface oxygen, but not deep oxygen, forecasts were more skillful than at least one null model &gt;80 % of the forecasted period, indicating that our process-based model was able to reproduce the dynamics of these two variables with greater reliability than the null models. However, process-based oxygen forecasts from deeper waters were less skillful than both null models during a majority of the forecasted period, which suggests that deep-water oxygen dynamics are dominated by autocorrelation and seasonal change, which are inherently captured by the null forecasts. Our results highlight that forecast performance varies among lake water quality metrics and that process-based forecasts can provide important information in conjunction with null models in varying environmental conditions. Altogether, these process-based forecasts can be used to develop quantitative tools which inform our understanding of future ecosystem change.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51024,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Informatics","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 102825"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574954124003674/pdfft?md5=9a53fafcb216d3f908b82767ac100cd5&pid=1-s2.0-S1574954124003674-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574954124003674","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Near-term iterative ecological forecasting has great potential for providing new insights into our ability to predict multiple ecological variables. However, true, out-of-sample probabilistic forecasts remain rare, and variability in forecast performance has largely been unexamined in process-based forecasts which predict multiple ecosystem variables. To explore how forecast performance varies for water temperature and dissolved oxygen, two freshwater variables important for lake ecosystem functioning, we produced probabilistic forecasts at multiple depths over two open-water seasons in Lake Sunapee, NH, USA. Our forecasting system, FLARE (Forecasting Lake And Reservoir Ecosystems), uses a 1-D coupled hydrodynamic-biogeochemical process model, which we assessed relative to both climatology and persistence null models to quantify how much information process-based FLARE forecasts provide over null models across varying environmental conditions. We found that FLARE water temperature forecasts were always more skillful than FLARE oxygen forecasts. Specifically, temperature forecasts outperformed both null models up to 11 days into the future, as compared to only two days for oxygen. Across different years, we observed variable forecast skill, with performance generally decreasing with depth for both variables. Overall, all temperature forecasts and surface oxygen, but not deep oxygen, forecasts were more skillful than at least one null model >80 % of the forecasted period, indicating that our process-based model was able to reproduce the dynamics of these two variables with greater reliability than the null models. However, process-based oxygen forecasts from deeper waters were less skillful than both null models during a majority of the forecasted period, which suggests that deep-water oxygen dynamics are dominated by autocorrelation and seasonal change, which are inherently captured by the null forecasts. Our results highlight that forecast performance varies among lake water quality metrics and that process-based forecasts can provide important information in conjunction with null models in varying environmental conditions. Altogether, these process-based forecasts can be used to develop quantitative tools which inform our understanding of future ecosystem change.

基于过程的湖泊水温和溶解氧预测结果优于空模型,且随时间和深度而变化
近期迭代生态预测在为我们预测多个生态变量的能力提供新见解方面具有巨大潜力。然而,真正的样本外概率预测仍然很少见,而且在预测多个生态系统变量的基于过程的预测中,预测性能的变化在很大程度上尚未得到研究。水温和溶解氧是对湖泊生态系统功能非常重要的两个淡水变量,为了探索这两个变量的预报性能如何变化,我们在美国新罕布什尔州苏纳皮湖的两个开放水域季节中制作了多个深度的概率预报。我们的预测系统 FLARE(预测湖泊和水库生态系统)采用了一维水动力-生物地球化学耦合过程模型,我们对该模型进行了相对于气候学和持久性空模型的评估,以量化在不同环境条件下基于过程的 FLARE 预测比空模型提供了多少信息。我们发现,FLARE 的水温预报总是比 FLARE 的氧气预报更准确。具体来说,温度预报在未来 11 天内的表现都优于两种无效模式,而氧气预报只有两天。在不同年份,我们观测到的预报技能是不同的,两个变量的预报技能一般随深度的增加而降低。总体而言,在 80% 的预报时段内,所有温度预报和表层氧气预报(而非深层氧气预报)都比至少一个空模型更准确,这表明我们基于过程的模型能够比空模型更可靠地再现这两个变量的动态变化。然而,在大部分预报时段内,基于过程的深水氧气预报不如两个空模型,这表明深水氧气动态主要受自相关性和季节变化的影响,而这正是空预报所能捕捉到的。我们的研究结果表明,不同湖泊水质指标的预报性能各不相同,在不同环境条件下,基于过程的预报可与空模型相结合提供重要信息。总之,这些基于过程的预测可用于开发定量工具,为我们了解未来生态系统变化提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Informatics
Ecological Informatics 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
346
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The journal Ecological Informatics is devoted to the publication of high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of computational ecology, data science and biogeography. The scope of the journal takes into account the data-intensive nature of ecology, the growing capacity of information technology to access, harness and leverage complex data as well as the critical need for informing sustainable management in view of global environmental and climate change. The nature of the journal is interdisciplinary at the crossover between ecology and informatics. It focuses on novel concepts and techniques for image- and genome-based monitoring and interpretation, sensor- and multimedia-based data acquisition, internet-based data archiving and sharing, data assimilation, modelling and prediction of ecological data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信