Exploring the relationship of colour categorization with pork colour standards under different subjective and objective conditions

IF 7.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
B. Uttaro, S. Zawadski, M. Juárez
{"title":"Exploring the relationship of colour categorization with pork colour standards under different subjective and objective conditions","authors":"B. Uttaro,&nbsp;S. Zawadski,&nbsp;M. Juárez","doi":"10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The impact of using incorrect lighting while subjectively scoring pork colour with subjective standards (Japanese, Canadian, and Kodak grey) was explored. Lightness was more important than a good colour match between standards and meat. Subjective and image-based automated scoring with Canadian standards were correlated at 0.71–0.77 (<em>P &lt;</em> 0.001) with significant differences in scale distribution (D = 0.14–0.46; <em>P &lt;</em> 0.002), primarily with moderately dark meat. Automated scoring on full colour and greyscale images were strongly related (<em>r</em> = 0.83, <em>P &lt;</em> 0.001) and showed matching score distributions when whole scores were used. Tracking automated colour categorization during blooming showed very good potential for reliable categorization after 1 min exposure to air for most meat colours, indicating that reliable automated on-line sorting of pork for colour is easily within reach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":389,"journal":{"name":"Meat Science","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 109661"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meat Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0309174024002389","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impact of using incorrect lighting while subjectively scoring pork colour with subjective standards (Japanese, Canadian, and Kodak grey) was explored. Lightness was more important than a good colour match between standards and meat. Subjective and image-based automated scoring with Canadian standards were correlated at 0.71–0.77 (P < 0.001) with significant differences in scale distribution (D = 0.14–0.46; P < 0.002), primarily with moderately dark meat. Automated scoring on full colour and greyscale images were strongly related (r = 0.83, P < 0.001) and showed matching score distributions when whole scores were used. Tracking automated colour categorization during blooming showed very good potential for reliable categorization after 1 min exposure to air for most meat colours, indicating that reliable automated on-line sorting of pork for colour is easily within reach.

探索不同主客观条件下颜色分类与猪肉颜色标准的关系
在使用主观标准(日本、加拿大和柯达灰)对猪肉颜色进行主观评分时,探讨了使用不正确的照明所产生的影响。光亮度比标准与肉的颜色匹配度更重要。使用加拿大标准进行的主观评分和基于图像的自动评分的相关性为 0.71-0.77 (P < 0.001),但在比例分布上存在显著差异 (D = 0.14-0.46; P < 0.002),主要是在肉的颜色中等偏深的情况下。全彩色图像和灰度图像上的自动评分密切相关(r = 0.83,P < 0.001),并且在使用整体评分时显示出匹配的分数分布。在绽放期间跟踪自动颜色分类显示,在暴露于空气中 1 分钟后,大多数肉的颜色都有很好的可靠分类潜力,这表明可靠的猪肉颜色自动在线分类指日可待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Meat Science
Meat Science 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
282
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: The aim of Meat Science is to serve as a suitable platform for the dissemination of interdisciplinary and international knowledge on all factors influencing the properties of meat. While the journal primarily focuses on the flesh of mammals, contributions related to poultry will be considered if they enhance the overall understanding of the relationship between muscle nature and meat quality post mortem. Additionally, papers on large birds (e.g., emus, ostriches) as well as wild-captured mammals and crocodiles will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信