{"title":"Resilience of socio-technical transportation systems: A demand-driven community detection in human mobility structures","authors":"Ho-Yin Chan , Hanxi Ma , Jiangping Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2024.104244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Existing scholarship on transportation resilience analysis has primarily focused on engineering resilience, often overlooking the intricate socio-technical dimensions. This oversight underscores the necessity for a more comprehensive understanding of the dynamic interplay between social, including travel behaviors, and technical infrastructure components within transportation systems. This article delves into the impact of “social shocks” on transportation systems, which are defined as disturbances affecting the social subsystem without yet affecting the technical subsystem. Drawing inspiration from C.S. Holling’s ecological resilience, which signifies a system’s ability to cope with change by adapting its structure and functionality, we propose a multi-level resilience assessment framework. It encompasses four mobility-related indicators: entropy (measuring network-level complexity), stationarity (assessing community compositional changes at the cluster level), and two node-level metrics — within-module degree and weighted participation coefficient — capturing location connectivity. These indicators proxy for evaluating the mobility structure and node functionality within the social subsystem. In a case study, we analyze historical smart card data to examine the mobility pattern’s structural changes within Hong Kong, a rail-oriented metropolis, during a prolonged and city-wide protest. The framework and associated indicators provide an alternative perspective for transit planners and operators, allowing them to assess both the overall system and individual stations, moving beyond traditional assessments of service supply and patronage changes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 104244"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424002921","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Existing scholarship on transportation resilience analysis has primarily focused on engineering resilience, often overlooking the intricate socio-technical dimensions. This oversight underscores the necessity for a more comprehensive understanding of the dynamic interplay between social, including travel behaviors, and technical infrastructure components within transportation systems. This article delves into the impact of “social shocks” on transportation systems, which are defined as disturbances affecting the social subsystem without yet affecting the technical subsystem. Drawing inspiration from C.S. Holling’s ecological resilience, which signifies a system’s ability to cope with change by adapting its structure and functionality, we propose a multi-level resilience assessment framework. It encompasses four mobility-related indicators: entropy (measuring network-level complexity), stationarity (assessing community compositional changes at the cluster level), and two node-level metrics — within-module degree and weighted participation coefficient — capturing location connectivity. These indicators proxy for evaluating the mobility structure and node functionality within the social subsystem. In a case study, we analyze historical smart card data to examine the mobility pattern’s structural changes within Hong Kong, a rail-oriented metropolis, during a prolonged and city-wide protest. The framework and associated indicators provide an alternative perspective for transit planners and operators, allowing them to assess both the overall system and individual stations, moving beyond traditional assessments of service supply and patronage changes.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions.
Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.