Oluwagbemiga DadeMatthews MD, PhD , Jaimie A. Roper PhD , Adan Vazquez MS , David Shannon PhD , JoEllen M. Sefton MS, PhD
{"title":"Virtual Assessment of Functional Mobility in Lower Extremity Prosthesis Clients: An Exploratory Study","authors":"Oluwagbemiga DadeMatthews MD, PhD , Jaimie A. Roper PhD , Adan Vazquez MS , David Shannon PhD , JoEllen M. Sefton MS, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the relationship between patient perception of lower extremity function and a home-based virtual clinician assessment of mobility in lower limb prosthesis clients.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Descriptive observational study using a clinician-administered functional mobility survey and timed Up and Go test to assess lower extremity function under supervision.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant online virtual platform.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Twelve lower limb loss clients currently using prostheses, aged ≥19 years, not pregnant, and with no stroke, seizure disorder, or cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Not applicable.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Main outcomes were mobility survey scores and mean timed Up and Go duration.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Most participants reported significant ease of completing basic indoor ambulation and toileting tasks (66%-75%) and significant difficulty in running or prolonged ambulation activities (83%) requiring use of lower limb prosthesis. Timed Up and Go test was faster (11.0±2.9 s) than the reference range for transtibial prosthesis users and negatively associated with self-reported lower extremity functional status (<em>r</em>=−.70, <em>P</em>=.02).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Self-reported movement with lower limb prostheses at home and evaluation of mobility via a virtual platform is a feasible assessment modality that may reduce the frequency of therapy visits, defray some rehabilitation costs, and minimize the travel burden to distant prosthetic clinics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"6 3","pages":"Article 100355"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109524000533/pdfft?md5=8999de8e7f0138c6685f4a4a0acbc4cf&pid=1-s2.0-S2590109524000533-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109524000533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To investigate the relationship between patient perception of lower extremity function and a home-based virtual clinician assessment of mobility in lower limb prosthesis clients.
Design
Descriptive observational study using a clinician-administered functional mobility survey and timed Up and Go test to assess lower extremity function under supervision.
Setting
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant online virtual platform.
Participants
Twelve lower limb loss clients currently using prostheses, aged ≥19 years, not pregnant, and with no stroke, seizure disorder, or cancer.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
Main outcomes were mobility survey scores and mean timed Up and Go duration.
Results
Most participants reported significant ease of completing basic indoor ambulation and toileting tasks (66%-75%) and significant difficulty in running or prolonged ambulation activities (83%) requiring use of lower limb prosthesis. Timed Up and Go test was faster (11.0±2.9 s) than the reference range for transtibial prosthesis users and negatively associated with self-reported lower extremity functional status (r=−.70, P=.02).
Conclusions
Self-reported movement with lower limb prostheses at home and evaluation of mobility via a virtual platform is a feasible assessment modality that may reduce the frequency of therapy visits, defray some rehabilitation costs, and minimize the travel burden to distant prosthetic clinics.