Methods and applications for quantitative assessment of uncertainty in atmospheric particulate matter source profiles

IF 4.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yufei Zhang , Xin He , Chenchu Wang , Xuehan Wang , Lilai Song , Zhichao Lu , Xiaohui Bi , Yinchang Feng
{"title":"Methods and applications for quantitative assessment of uncertainty in atmospheric particulate matter source profiles","authors":"Yufei Zhang ,&nbsp;Xin He ,&nbsp;Chenchu Wang ,&nbsp;Xuehan Wang ,&nbsp;Lilai Song ,&nbsp;Zhichao Lu ,&nbsp;Xiaohui Bi ,&nbsp;Yinchang Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Particulate Matter (PM), a primary atmospheric pollutant, is characterized by diverse emission sources and complex influencing factors. Particulate matter source profiles (PM-SPs) reported in different studies exhibited significant variability, and their uncertainty is not well documented, highlighting the urgent need for further research. To scientifically evaluate PM-SPs, this study begins with the construction process of PM-SPs, identifying key stages (sampling, weighing, and chemical analysis) that influence their uncertainty. The uncertainty components at each stage, as well as the comprehensive uncertainty, are then quantitatively assessed, resulting in the development of an assessment method that quantifies the uncertainty of PM-SPs. The industrial PM-SPs are evaluated as a case study, which indicate this full-chain method can quantitatively identify the uncertainties introduced at various stages. The sampling uncertainties are mostly below 40%, primarily resulting from errors in repeat sampling. The weighing uncertainties are generally minor, while the impact of the chemical analysis process varies significantly across different components. Among the fifty-three evaluated PM-SPs, 80% have average comprehensive uncertainties below 40%, with only five profiles exhibiting relatively high uncertainties. In practical applications, the uncertainty assessment of PM-SPs should be analyzed on a case-by-case basis, considering the importance of different components, with special attention given to marker components.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":250,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Environment","volume":"338 ","pages":"Article 120815"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231024004904","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Particulate Matter (PM), a primary atmospheric pollutant, is characterized by diverse emission sources and complex influencing factors. Particulate matter source profiles (PM-SPs) reported in different studies exhibited significant variability, and their uncertainty is not well documented, highlighting the urgent need for further research. To scientifically evaluate PM-SPs, this study begins with the construction process of PM-SPs, identifying key stages (sampling, weighing, and chemical analysis) that influence their uncertainty. The uncertainty components at each stage, as well as the comprehensive uncertainty, are then quantitatively assessed, resulting in the development of an assessment method that quantifies the uncertainty of PM-SPs. The industrial PM-SPs are evaluated as a case study, which indicate this full-chain method can quantitatively identify the uncertainties introduced at various stages. The sampling uncertainties are mostly below 40%, primarily resulting from errors in repeat sampling. The weighing uncertainties are generally minor, while the impact of the chemical analysis process varies significantly across different components. Among the fifty-three evaluated PM-SPs, 80% have average comprehensive uncertainties below 40%, with only five profiles exhibiting relatively high uncertainties. In practical applications, the uncertainty assessment of PM-SPs should be analyzed on a case-by-case basis, considering the importance of different components, with special attention given to marker components.

Abstract Image

定量评估大气颗粒物源剖面不确定性的方法和应用
颗粒物(PM)是一种主要的大气污染物,具有排放源多样、影响因素复杂的特点。不同研究中报告的颗粒物源剖面图(PM-SPs)表现出很大的差异性,而且其不确定性也没有得到很好的记录,这凸显了进一步研究的迫切性。为了科学地评估 PM-SPs,本研究从 PM-SPs 的构建过程入手,确定了影响其不确定性的关键阶段(采样、称重和化学分析)。然后对每个阶段的不确定性成分以及综合不确定性进行定量评估,最终制定出一种评估方法,对 PM-SPs 的不确定性进行量化。以工业 PM-SP 为案例进行了评估,结果表明这种全链式方法可以定量识别各阶段引入的不确定性。采样的不确定性大多低于 40%,主要是重复采样的误差造成的。称重的不确定性一般较小,而化学分析过程对不同成分的影响则差别很大。在 53 个已评估的 PM-SPs 中,80% 的平均综合不确定度低于 40%,只有五个剖面的不确定度相对较高。在实际应用中,PM-SP 的不确定性评估应根据具体情况进行分析,考虑不同成分的重要性,并特别关注标记成分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Atmospheric Environment
Atmospheric Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
8.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Atmospheric Environment has an open access mirror journal Atmospheric Environment: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. Atmospheric Environment is the international journal for scientists in different disciplines related to atmospheric composition and its impacts. The journal publishes scientific articles with atmospheric relevance of emissions and depositions of gaseous and particulate compounds, chemical processes and physical effects in the atmosphere, as well as impacts of the changing atmospheric composition on human health, air quality, climate change, and ecosystems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信