The Impact of Spinopelvic and Hip Mobility on Passive Hip Flexion Range of Motion Assessment

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Hiroyuki Tokuyasu RPT , Eiki Tsushima RPT, PhD , Mitsuru Takemoto MD, PhD , Claudio Vergari PhD , Hiroshi Tada MD , Youngwoo Kim MD, PhD
{"title":"The Impact of Spinopelvic and Hip Mobility on Passive Hip Flexion Range of Motion Assessment","authors":"Hiroyuki Tokuyasu RPT ,&nbsp;Eiki Tsushima RPT, PhD ,&nbsp;Mitsuru Takemoto MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Claudio Vergari PhD ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Tada MD ,&nbsp;Youngwoo Kim MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Measuring passive hip flexion range of motion (ROM) is challenging due to compensatory movements. Despite the interest in using functional lateral radiographs for assessing hip mobility, the relationship with passive hip flexion ROM remains unclear. This study aims to elucidate this relationship and clarify spinopelvic parameters and mobility factors influencing variations in passive and radiographic hip flexion ROM.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 154 preoperative patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty. Passive and radiographic hip flexion ROM were assessed to clarify these relationships, and these differences were classified into 3 groups (O, A and U). Spinopelvic and hip parameters were assessed in standing, relaxed-seated and flexed-seated positions, as well as lumbar, pelvis, and hip mobility between each position to identify factors influencing differences.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was a moderate correlation between passive and radiographic hip flexion ROM (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.48, <em>P</em> &lt; .01). A significant difference was found in pelvic and hip alignment in the flexed-seated position between all groups. In postural changes, the O group, which had more patients with relatively low hip mobility, showed greater lumbar spine and pelvic movement, while the U group, which had more patients with relatively high hip mobility, showed less lumbar spine and pelvic movement.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study confirmed that passive hip flexion ROM and radiographic hip flexion ROM correlate and that spinopelvic and hip alignment and mobility influence these differences. This result suggests that clinicians should consider lumbar and pelvic alignment and mobility in clinical practice to improve the accuracy of passive hip flexion ROM measurements.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 101429"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344124001146/pdfft?md5=7a83ba078718a5fa7577e6392fd50f37&pid=1-s2.0-S2352344124001146-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344124001146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Measuring passive hip flexion range of motion (ROM) is challenging due to compensatory movements. Despite the interest in using functional lateral radiographs for assessing hip mobility, the relationship with passive hip flexion ROM remains unclear. This study aims to elucidate this relationship and clarify spinopelvic parameters and mobility factors influencing variations in passive and radiographic hip flexion ROM.

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 154 preoperative patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty. Passive and radiographic hip flexion ROM were assessed to clarify these relationships, and these differences were classified into 3 groups (O, A and U). Spinopelvic and hip parameters were assessed in standing, relaxed-seated and flexed-seated positions, as well as lumbar, pelvis, and hip mobility between each position to identify factors influencing differences.

Results

There was a moderate correlation between passive and radiographic hip flexion ROM (R2 = 0.48, P < .01). A significant difference was found in pelvic and hip alignment in the flexed-seated position between all groups. In postural changes, the O group, which had more patients with relatively low hip mobility, showed greater lumbar spine and pelvic movement, while the U group, which had more patients with relatively high hip mobility, showed less lumbar spine and pelvic movement.

Conclusions

This study confirmed that passive hip flexion ROM and radiographic hip flexion ROM correlate and that spinopelvic and hip alignment and mobility influence these differences. This result suggests that clinicians should consider lumbar and pelvic alignment and mobility in clinical practice to improve the accuracy of passive hip flexion ROM measurements.

脊柱骨和髋关节活动度对被动髋关节屈伸活动范围评估的影响
背景由于代偿运动的存在,测量髋关节被动屈曲活动范围(ROM)具有一定的难度。尽管人们对使用功能性侧位片来评估髋关节活动度很感兴趣,但其与被动髋关节屈曲活动度之间的关系仍不清楚。本研究旨在阐明这种关系,并明确影响被动和放射学髋关节屈曲 ROM 变化的脊柱骨盆参数和活动度因素。方法对 154 名接受初级全髋关节置换术的术前患者进行了回顾性横断面研究。对被动和影像学髋关节屈曲 ROM 进行评估,以明确这些关系,并将这些差异分为 3 组(O、A 和 U)。评估了站立、放松坐位和屈曲坐位时的脊柱骨盆和髋关节参数,以及每个体位之间的腰部、骨盆和髋关节活动度,以确定影响差异的因素。所有组别在屈膝坐位时的骨盆和髋关节对齐情况存在明显差异。在体位变化方面,O 组中髋关节活动度相对较低的患者较多,腰椎和骨盆活动度较大;而 U 组中髋关节活动度相对较高的患者较多,腰椎和骨盆活动度较小。这一结果表明,临床医生在临床实践中应考虑腰椎和骨盆的排列和活动度,以提高被动髋关节屈曲 ROM 测量的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthroplasty Today
Arthroplasty Today Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
258
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthroplasty Today is a companion journal to the Journal of Arthroplasty. The journal Arthroplasty Today brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement of the hip and knee in an open-access, online format. Arthroplasty Today solicits manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas of scientific endeavor that relate to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with patient outcomes, economic and policy issues, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, and biologic response to arthroplasty. The journal focuses on case reports. It is the purpose of Arthroplasty Today to present material to practicing orthopaedic surgeons that will keep them abreast of developments in the field, prove useful in the care of patients, and aid in understanding the scientific foundation of this subspecialty area of joint replacement. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal''s area of interest. Their participation ensures that each issue of Arthroplasty Today provides the reader with timely, peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信