Cinara Gambirage , Jaison Caetano da Silva , Flavio Carvalho de Vasconcelos , Ronaldo Couto Parente
{"title":"Home country institutions and nonmarket political strategy effects on EMNE foreign location choice","authors":"Cinara Gambirage , Jaison Caetano da Silva , Flavio Carvalho de Vasconcelos , Ronaldo Couto Parente","doi":"10.1016/j.lrp.2024.102477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While the literature has generated impressive insights on why emerging market multinationals enterprises (EMNEs) select certain foreign locations over others, we still lack an understanding of how the home country institutional weakness affects EMNEs' foreign location choices and the mechanisms through which EMNEs overcome this effect. In this study, we investigate how the home country institutional weakness affects EMNEs' foreign location choices and how EMNEs can use home country nonmarket political strategy to address their liability of foreignness. We argue that EMNEs struggle with home country institutional weakness that are carried over in host countries and create barriers for EMNEs to enter developed or markets more institutionally distant from their home country. Thus, EMNEs are more likely to choose institutionally similar countries as their foreign direct investment (FDI) targets to help them offset the additional liability they carry. Thus, the nonmarket political strategy can serve as a response to address barriers and help EMNEs reach developed markets and those more distant from their home country institutions. On the other hand, the findings show limitations of the strategy to completely moderates the effects of home country institutional weakness on EMNEs’ foreign location choices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18141,"journal":{"name":"Long Range Planning","volume":"57 6","pages":"Article 102477"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024630124000645/pdfft?md5=4495bdb1d1cca27a73095f64daa80d4c&pid=1-s2.0-S0024630124000645-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Long Range Planning","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024630124000645","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While the literature has generated impressive insights on why emerging market multinationals enterprises (EMNEs) select certain foreign locations over others, we still lack an understanding of how the home country institutional weakness affects EMNEs' foreign location choices and the mechanisms through which EMNEs overcome this effect. In this study, we investigate how the home country institutional weakness affects EMNEs' foreign location choices and how EMNEs can use home country nonmarket political strategy to address their liability of foreignness. We argue that EMNEs struggle with home country institutional weakness that are carried over in host countries and create barriers for EMNEs to enter developed or markets more institutionally distant from their home country. Thus, EMNEs are more likely to choose institutionally similar countries as their foreign direct investment (FDI) targets to help them offset the additional liability they carry. Thus, the nonmarket political strategy can serve as a response to address barriers and help EMNEs reach developed markets and those more distant from their home country institutions. On the other hand, the findings show limitations of the strategy to completely moderates the effects of home country institutional weakness on EMNEs’ foreign location choices.
期刊介绍:
Long Range Planning (LRP) is an internationally renowned journal specializing in the field of strategic management. Since its establishment in 1968, the journal has consistently published original research, garnering a strong reputation among academics. LRP actively encourages the submission of articles that involve empirical research and theoretical perspectives, including studies that provide critical assessments and analysis of the current state of knowledge in crucial strategic areas. The primary user base of LRP primarily comprises individuals from academic backgrounds, with the journal playing a dual role within this community. Firstly, it serves as a platform for the dissemination of research findings among academic researchers. Secondly, it serves as a channel for the transmission of ideas that can be effectively utilized in educational settings. The articles published in LRP cater to a diverse audience, including practicing managers and students in professional programs. While some articles may focus on practical applications, others may primarily target academic researchers. LRP adopts an inclusive approach to empirical research, accepting studies that draw on various methodologies such as primary survey data, archival data, case studies, and recognized approaches to data collection.