Establishing benchmarks to determine the embodied carbon performance of high-speed rail systems

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Guisong Guo , Xiaodong Li , Chen Zhu , Yankun Wu , Jian Chen , Peng Chen , Xi Cheng
{"title":"Establishing benchmarks to determine the embodied carbon performance of high-speed rail systems","authors":"Guisong Guo ,&nbsp;Xiaodong Li ,&nbsp;Chen Zhu ,&nbsp;Yankun Wu ,&nbsp;Jian Chen ,&nbsp;Peng Chen ,&nbsp;Xi Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.114924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The extensive construction of high-speed rail (HSR) has led to considerable embodied carbon emissions, threatening carbon reduction targets and necessitating effective governance. Previous studies have focused on the carbon accounting of HSR, providing only pre-evaluation information for management. To measure the carbon emission level of HSR and guide improvements, it is essential to establish quantified carbon emission benchmarks as “yardsticks” for decision-making comparisons. Hence, this study proposes a data-driven method for determining the embodied carbon emission benchmarks of the HSR system, involving dataset construction, carbon accounting, statistical analysis, validation, and uncertainty assessment. Based on a dataset comprising 1226 HSR subprojects in China, a classified and graded HSR embodied carbon emission benchmark system is constructed, and the underlying causes for the emission differences among categories of HSR subsystems are explored. In addition to providing various benchmark values, the research results also demonstrate the decarbonization potential of advanced HSR construction technologies such as ballastless tracks, long-span box girders, and shield tunneling methods. Overall, this study can provide a decision basis for evaluating the HSR emission performance and offer insights into the selection of emission reduction technologies, thereby facilitating the low-carbon sustainable development of HSR construction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"207 ","pages":"Article 114924"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124006506/pdfft?md5=413db2c63614ac82796362b3ac9a1114&pid=1-s2.0-S1364032124006506-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124006506","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The extensive construction of high-speed rail (HSR) has led to considerable embodied carbon emissions, threatening carbon reduction targets and necessitating effective governance. Previous studies have focused on the carbon accounting of HSR, providing only pre-evaluation information for management. To measure the carbon emission level of HSR and guide improvements, it is essential to establish quantified carbon emission benchmarks as “yardsticks” for decision-making comparisons. Hence, this study proposes a data-driven method for determining the embodied carbon emission benchmarks of the HSR system, involving dataset construction, carbon accounting, statistical analysis, validation, and uncertainty assessment. Based on a dataset comprising 1226 HSR subprojects in China, a classified and graded HSR embodied carbon emission benchmark system is constructed, and the underlying causes for the emission differences among categories of HSR subsystems are explored. In addition to providing various benchmark values, the research results also demonstrate the decarbonization potential of advanced HSR construction technologies such as ballastless tracks, long-span box girders, and shield tunneling methods. Overall, this study can provide a decision basis for evaluating the HSR emission performance and offer insights into the selection of emission reduction technologies, thereby facilitating the low-carbon sustainable development of HSR construction.

建立基准,确定高速铁路系统的内含碳性能
高速铁路(HSR)的大规模建设导致了大量的内含碳排放,威胁到碳减排目标,因此必须进行有效治理。以往的研究主要集中在高铁的碳核算方面,只能为管理部门提供预评估信息。要衡量高铁的碳排放水平并指导改进工作,必须建立量化的碳排放基准,作为决策比较的 "标尺"。因此,本研究提出了一种数据驱动的方法来确定高铁系统的体现碳排放基准,包括数据集构建、碳核算、统计分析、验证和不确定性评估。基于中国 1226 个高铁子项目的数据集,构建了分类分级的高铁内含碳排放基准体系,并探讨了不同类别高铁子系统排放差异的根本原因。除了提供各种基准值,研究成果还展示了无砟轨道、大跨度箱梁、盾构掘进法等先进高铁建设技术的脱碳潜力。总之,本研究可为评估高铁排放性能提供决策依据,为减排技术的选择提供启示,从而促进高铁建设的低碳可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信