{"title":"Exploring deep learning models for roadside landslide prediction: Insights and implications from comparative analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pce.2024.103741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study undertakes a comparative analysis of four distinct deep learning models, i.e., Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Deep Neural Network (DNN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), in the context of roadside landslide prediction, aiming to provide comprehensive insights into their strengths and weaknesses. A geospatial dataset from the Lai Châu province, Vietnam, with thirteen environmental factors (elevation, aspect, slope, curvature, topographic wetness index, stream power index, flow accumulation, geology, normalized difference vegetation index, maximum rainfall, average annual rainfall, and proximity to faults and rivers) and 284 road-along landslides was considered for analysis. Our modeling efforts yielded invaluable insights into the performance of these models during both training and validation phases. The DNN model emerged as the frontrunner in the training phase, boasting the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94, accuracy of 87.47%, kappa of 0.748, and lowest RMSE of 0.125. However, during validation, the CNN model outshone others, exhibiting the highest AUC of 0.88 and overall accuracy of 80.00%. Despite variations in performance metrics across phases, CNN consistently demonstrated robust predictive prowess. The findings of this study underscore the significance of selecting appropriate machine learning models tailored to specific contexts and objectives. Moreover, they contribute valuable insights for decision-makers and researchers alike, ultimately aiming to enhance the safety and resilience of communities inhabiting landslide-prone areas. Moving forward, future research directions may explore ensemble methods, novel architectures, and interpretability techniques to further advance predictive accuracy and applicability in roadside landslide susceptibility modeling.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54616,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474706524001992","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study undertakes a comparative analysis of four distinct deep learning models, i.e., Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Deep Neural Network (DNN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), in the context of roadside landslide prediction, aiming to provide comprehensive insights into their strengths and weaknesses. A geospatial dataset from the Lai Châu province, Vietnam, with thirteen environmental factors (elevation, aspect, slope, curvature, topographic wetness index, stream power index, flow accumulation, geology, normalized difference vegetation index, maximum rainfall, average annual rainfall, and proximity to faults and rivers) and 284 road-along landslides was considered for analysis. Our modeling efforts yielded invaluable insights into the performance of these models during both training and validation phases. The DNN model emerged as the frontrunner in the training phase, boasting the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94, accuracy of 87.47%, kappa of 0.748, and lowest RMSE of 0.125. However, during validation, the CNN model outshone others, exhibiting the highest AUC of 0.88 and overall accuracy of 80.00%. Despite variations in performance metrics across phases, CNN consistently demonstrated robust predictive prowess. The findings of this study underscore the significance of selecting appropriate machine learning models tailored to specific contexts and objectives. Moreover, they contribute valuable insights for decision-makers and researchers alike, ultimately aiming to enhance the safety and resilience of communities inhabiting landslide-prone areas. Moving forward, future research directions may explore ensemble methods, novel architectures, and interpretability techniques to further advance predictive accuracy and applicability in roadside landslide susceptibility modeling.
期刊介绍:
Physics and Chemistry of the Earth is an international interdisciplinary journal for the rapid publication of collections of refereed communications in separate thematic issues, either stemming from scientific meetings, or, especially compiled for the occasion. There is no restriction on the length of articles published in the journal. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth incorporates the separate Parts A, B and C which existed until the end of 2001.
Please note: the Editors are unable to consider submissions that are not invited or linked to a thematic issue. Please do not submit unsolicited papers.
The journal covers the following subject areas:
-Solid Earth and Geodesy:
(geology, geochemistry, tectonophysics, seismology, volcanology, palaeomagnetism and rock magnetism, electromagnetism and potential fields, marine and environmental geosciences as well as geodesy).
-Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere:
(hydrology and water resources research, engineering and management, oceanography and oceanic chemistry, shelf, sea, lake and river sciences, meteorology and atmospheric sciences incl. chemistry as well as climatology and glaciology).
-Solar-Terrestrial and Planetary Science:
(solar, heliospheric and solar-planetary sciences, geology, geophysics and atmospheric sciences of planets, satellites and small bodies as well as cosmochemistry and exobiology).