Addressing climate change in Berlin's local land-use plans through strategic environmental assessment and knowledge brokering

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Tiago Rodrigues , Gesa Geißler , Marcelo Montaño
{"title":"Addressing climate change in Berlin's local land-use plans through strategic environmental assessment and knowledge brokering","authors":"Tiago Rodrigues ,&nbsp;Gesa Geißler ,&nbsp;Marcelo Montaño","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study explores the context of establishing local land use plans in Berlin, which, guided by Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA), have shown potential to implement climate adaptation solutions in the urban landscape. The case study aims to identify contextual factors that promote knowledge brokering (KB) and facilitate the inclusion of climate issues in decision-making processes. Based on personal interviews with open-ended questions and document analysis, the Narrative Interview method was employed to understand the relevant internal aspects of the frequent practice of local plans, as well as to observe the articulation of KB spaces. In this sense, we identified the main characteristics of this practice, highlighting the conditions necessary for KB, the complexity of the strategies employed and the relevance of the relationship between the use of information and mediation in promoting changes in decision-making. The results also indicate that both the formulation of local land use plans and the promotion of climate issues are highly stimulated by the adoption of mediation strategies. However, the practice in Berlin prefers to operate from less complex strategies, and the relevance of the climate issue is not fully understood by the interviewees. This situation, combined with the lack of clearer regulations, prevents the issue from being explored more widely. Furthermore, it has been revealed that the promotion of climate issues is surrounded by governance practices that operate through both bottom-up and top-down forces, and also depend on contextual factors such as decision-making regimes, involved stakeholders, the quality of planning guidelines, the effectiveness of SEA, and the level of public participation. These factors, in turn, are influenced by the phenomenon of knowledge mediation and promoted and strengthened through learning. Thus, the case reveals that addressing climate issues depends on aligning these factors and understanding their complexity. This study confirms the significant role of SEA and knowledge brokering in facilitating not only the addressing of climate issues, but also in promoting solutions based on more plural approaches that are better prepared to tackle complex challenges.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 107651"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524002385","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the context of establishing local land use plans in Berlin, which, guided by Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA), have shown potential to implement climate adaptation solutions in the urban landscape. The case study aims to identify contextual factors that promote knowledge brokering (KB) and facilitate the inclusion of climate issues in decision-making processes. Based on personal interviews with open-ended questions and document analysis, the Narrative Interview method was employed to understand the relevant internal aspects of the frequent practice of local plans, as well as to observe the articulation of KB spaces. In this sense, we identified the main characteristics of this practice, highlighting the conditions necessary for KB, the complexity of the strategies employed and the relevance of the relationship between the use of information and mediation in promoting changes in decision-making. The results also indicate that both the formulation of local land use plans and the promotion of climate issues are highly stimulated by the adoption of mediation strategies. However, the practice in Berlin prefers to operate from less complex strategies, and the relevance of the climate issue is not fully understood by the interviewees. This situation, combined with the lack of clearer regulations, prevents the issue from being explored more widely. Furthermore, it has been revealed that the promotion of climate issues is surrounded by governance practices that operate through both bottom-up and top-down forces, and also depend on contextual factors such as decision-making regimes, involved stakeholders, the quality of planning guidelines, the effectiveness of SEA, and the level of public participation. These factors, in turn, are influenced by the phenomenon of knowledge mediation and promoted and strengthened through learning. Thus, the case reveals that addressing climate issues depends on aligning these factors and understanding their complexity. This study confirms the significant role of SEA and knowledge brokering in facilitating not only the addressing of climate issues, but also in promoting solutions based on more plural approaches that are better prepared to tackle complex challenges.

通过战略环境评估和知识中介在柏林地方土地使用计划中应对气候变化
本研究探讨了柏林制定地方土地利用规划的背景,在战略环境评估(SEA)的指导下,这些规划显示出在城市景观中实施气候适应解决方案的潜力。案例研究旨在确定促进知识中介(KB)和推动将气候问题纳入决策过程的背景因素。基于开放式问题的个人访谈和文件分析,我们采用了叙事访谈法,以了解地方计划频繁实践的相关内部方面,并观察知识中介空间的衔接情况。从这个意义上说,我们确定了这种做法的主要特点,突出了知识库的必要条件、所采用策略的复杂性以及在促进决策变革中使用信息和调解之间关系的相关性。研究结果还表明,采用调解策略对当地土地利用规划的制定和气候问题的宣传都有很大的促进作用。然而,柏林的实践更倾向于采用不太复杂的策略,而且受访者对气候问题的相关性并不完全了解。这种情况,再加上缺乏更明确的规定,使这一问题无法得到更广泛的探讨。此外,受访者还发现,气候问题的推广受到自下而上和自上而下两种力量共同作用的治理实践的影响,同时也取决于决策制度、利益相关者的参与、规划指导方针的质量、环境影响评估的有效性以及公众参与的程度等背景因素。这些因素反过来又受到知识中介现象的影响,并通过学习得到促进和加强。因此,本案例揭示了解决气候问题取决于对这些因素的协调和对其复杂性的理解。本研究证实了 SEA 和知识中介不仅在促进解决气候问题方面发挥着重要作用,而且在促进基于更多元方法的解决方案方面也发挥着重要作用,这些方法能够更好地应对复杂的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信