Predicting cannabis use moderation among a sample of digital self-help subscribers: A machine learning study

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Marleen I.A. Olthof , Lucas A. Ramos , Margriet W. van Laar , Anna E. Goudriaan , Matthijs Blankers
{"title":"Predicting cannabis use moderation among a sample of digital self-help subscribers: A machine learning study","authors":"Marleen I.A. Olthof ,&nbsp;Lucas A. Ramos ,&nbsp;Margriet W. van Laar ,&nbsp;Anna E. Goudriaan ,&nbsp;Matthijs Blankers","doi":"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>For individuals who wish to reduce their cannabis use without formal help, there are a variety of self-help tools available. Although some are proven to be effective in reducing cannabis use, effect sizes are typically small. More insight into predictors of successful reduction of use among individuals who frequently use cannabis and desire to reduce/quit could help identify factors that contribute to successful cannabis use moderation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed data taken from a randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the digital cannabis intervention ICan to four online modules of educational information on cannabis. For the current study, we included 253 participants. Success was defined as reducing the grams of cannabis used in the past 7 days at baseline by at least 50 % at 6-month follow-up. To train and evaluate the machine learning models we used a nested k-fold cross-validation procedure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results show that the two models applied had comparable low AUROC values of .61 (Random Forest) and .57 (Logistic Regression). Not identifying oneself as a cannabis user, not using tobacco products, high levels of depressive symptoms, high levels of psychological distress and high initial cannabis use values were the relatively most important predictors for success, although overall the associations were not strong.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study found only modest prediction accuracy when using machine learning models to predict success among individuals who use cannabis and desire to reduce/quit and show interest in digital self-help tools.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11322,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence","volume":"264 ","pages":"Article 112431"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871624013565/pdfft?md5=127013e38f5e81aa741672271d4c5927&pid=1-s2.0-S0376871624013565-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871624013565","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

For individuals who wish to reduce their cannabis use without formal help, there are a variety of self-help tools available. Although some are proven to be effective in reducing cannabis use, effect sizes are typically small. More insight into predictors of successful reduction of use among individuals who frequently use cannabis and desire to reduce/quit could help identify factors that contribute to successful cannabis use moderation.

Methods

We analyzed data taken from a randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the digital cannabis intervention ICan to four online modules of educational information on cannabis. For the current study, we included 253 participants. Success was defined as reducing the grams of cannabis used in the past 7 days at baseline by at least 50 % at 6-month follow-up. To train and evaluate the machine learning models we used a nested k-fold cross-validation procedure.

Results

The results show that the two models applied had comparable low AUROC values of .61 (Random Forest) and .57 (Logistic Regression). Not identifying oneself as a cannabis user, not using tobacco products, high levels of depressive symptoms, high levels of psychological distress and high initial cannabis use values were the relatively most important predictors for success, although overall the associations were not strong.

Conclusions

Our study found only modest prediction accuracy when using machine learning models to predict success among individuals who use cannabis and desire to reduce/quit and show interest in digital self-help tools.

预测数字自助用户样本中的大麻使用节制:机器学习研究
背景对于希望在没有正规帮助的情况下减少大麻使用的人来说,有多种自助工具可供使用。虽然有些工具已被证明对减少大麻使用有效,但效果通常很小。我们分析了一项随机对照试验中的数据,该试验比较了数字大麻干预ICan与四个大麻教育信息在线模块的效果。在本次研究中,我们纳入了 253 名参与者。成功的定义是,在 6 个月的随访中,过去 7 天内使用大麻的克数在基线上至少减少了 50%。为了训练和评估机器学习模型,我们使用了嵌套 k 倍交叉验证程序。结果显示,所应用的两个模型的 AUROC 值分别为 0.61(随机森林)和 0.57(逻辑回归),具有可比性。未确认自己是大麻使用者、未使用烟草制品、抑郁症状严重、心理困扰严重和初始大麻使用值高是相对最重要的成功预测因素,但总体关联性不强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol dependence
Drug and alcohol dependence 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
409
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Dependence is an international journal devoted to publishing original research, scholarly reviews, commentaries, and policy analyses in the area of drug, alcohol and tobacco use and dependence. Articles range from studies of the chemistry of substances of abuse, their actions at molecular and cellular sites, in vitro and in vivo investigations of their biochemical, pharmacological and behavioural actions, laboratory-based and clinical research in humans, substance abuse treatment and prevention research, and studies employing methods from epidemiology, sociology, and economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信