Quantification of mycolic acids in different mycobacterial species by standard addition method through liquid chromatography mass spectrometry

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Zeeshan Fatima , Meenakshi Chugh , Gaurav Nigam , Saif Hameed
{"title":"Quantification of mycolic acids in different mycobacterial species by standard addition method through liquid chromatography mass spectrometry","authors":"Zeeshan Fatima ,&nbsp;Meenakshi Chugh ,&nbsp;Gaurav Nigam ,&nbsp;Saif Hameed","doi":"10.1016/j.jchromb.2024.124297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Mycobacteria</em> possess unique and robust lipid profile responsible for their pathogenesis and drug resistance. Mycolic acid (MA) represents an attractive diagnostic biomarker being absent in humans, inert and known to modulate host-pathogen interaction. Accurate measurement of MA is significant to design efficient therapeutics. Despite considerable advances in Liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) based approaches, quantification of mycobacterial lipids including MA is still challenging mainly because of ion suppression effects due to complex matrix and non-availability of suitable internal standards for MA. The current study demonstrates the use of standard addition method (SAM) to circumvent this problem and provides a reliable and exhaustive analytical method to quantify mycobacterial MA based on reversed-phase ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography- mass spectrometry data acquisition. In this method, multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) has been applied, wherein 16 MRM channels or transitions have been chosen for quantification of alpha-, methoxy- and keto-MAs with C-24 and C-26 hydrocarbon chains that are actually best suited for TB diagnostics. We found that the overall methodological limit of detection and limit of quantification were in the range 0.05–0.71 ng/µl and 0.16–2.16 ng/µl. Taken together, SAM quantitative technique could serve as promising alternative for relative concentration determination of MA to aid medical research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chromatography B","volume":"1247 ","pages":"Article 124297"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chromatography B","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570023224003064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mycobacteria possess unique and robust lipid profile responsible for their pathogenesis and drug resistance. Mycolic acid (MA) represents an attractive diagnostic biomarker being absent in humans, inert and known to modulate host-pathogen interaction. Accurate measurement of MA is significant to design efficient therapeutics. Despite considerable advances in Liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) based approaches, quantification of mycobacterial lipids including MA is still challenging mainly because of ion suppression effects due to complex matrix and non-availability of suitable internal standards for MA. The current study demonstrates the use of standard addition method (SAM) to circumvent this problem and provides a reliable and exhaustive analytical method to quantify mycobacterial MA based on reversed-phase ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography- mass spectrometry data acquisition. In this method, multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) has been applied, wherein 16 MRM channels or transitions have been chosen for quantification of alpha-, methoxy- and keto-MAs with C-24 and C-26 hydrocarbon chains that are actually best suited for TB diagnostics. We found that the overall methodological limit of detection and limit of quantification were in the range 0.05–0.71 ng/µl and 0.16–2.16 ng/µl. Taken together, SAM quantitative technique could serve as promising alternative for relative concentration determination of MA to aid medical research.

用标准添加法通过液相色谱质谱法定量不同分枝杆菌中的霉菌酸
分枝杆菌拥有独特而强大的脂质特征,是其致病和耐药性的根源。霉菌酸(MA)是一种有吸引力的诊断生物标记物,它不存在于人类体内,是惰性的,而且已知可调节宿主与病原体之间的相互作用。准确测量霉菌酸对设计有效的治疗方法非常重要。尽管基于液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)的方法取得了长足的进步,但包括 MA 在内的分枝杆菌脂质的定量仍然具有挑战性,主要原因是复杂基质造成的离子抑制效应以及无法获得合适的 MA 内标。本研究展示了使用标准添加法(SAM)来规避这一问题,并提供了一种基于反相超高效液相色谱-质谱数据采集的可靠、详尽的分析方法来定量检测分枝杆菌 MA。该方法采用了多重反应监测(MRM)技术,其中选择了 16 个 MRM 通道或跃迁来定量分析具有 C-24 和 C-26 碳氢链的α-、甲氧基和酮-MAs,这些物质实际上最适合结核病诊断。我们发现,该方法的总体检测限和定量限分别为 0.05-0.71 纳克/微升和 0.16-2.16 纳克/微升。综上所述,SAM 定量技术有望成为 MA 相对浓度测定的替代方法,为医学研究提供帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chromatography B
Journal of Chromatography B 医学-分析化学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
306
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chromatography B publishes papers on developments in separation science relevant to biology and biomedical research including both fundamental advances and applications. Analytical techniques which may be considered include the various facets of chromatography, electrophoresis and related methods, affinity and immunoaffinity-based methodologies, hyphenated and other multi-dimensional techniques, and microanalytical approaches. The journal also considers articles reporting developments in sample preparation, detection techniques including mass spectrometry, and data handling and analysis. Developments related to preparative separations for the isolation and purification of components of biological systems may be published, including chromatographic and electrophoretic methods, affinity separations, field flow fractionation and other preparative approaches. Applications to the analysis of biological systems and samples will be considered when the analytical science contains a significant element of novelty, e.g. a new approach to the separation of a compound, novel combination of analytical techniques, or significantly improved analytical performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信