Prioritisation of early pregnancy risk factors for stillbirth: An international multistakeholder modified e-Delphi consensus study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Amy Hough , Javier Zamora , Shakila Thangaratinam , John Allotey
{"title":"Prioritisation of early pregnancy risk factors for stillbirth: An international multistakeholder modified e-Delphi consensus study","authors":"Amy Hough ,&nbsp;Javier Zamora ,&nbsp;Shakila Thangaratinam ,&nbsp;John Allotey","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.09.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify and prioritise early pregnancy risk factors for stillbirth to inform prognostic factor and model research.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We used a modified e-Delphi method and consultation meeting to achieve consensus. Risk factors for early, late and stillbirth at any gestation identified from an umbrella review of risk factors for stillbirth were entered into a two-stage online Delphi survey with an international group of stakeholders made up of healthcare professionals and researchers.</p><p>The RAND/ University of California at Los Angeles appropriateness method was used to evaluate consensus. Responders voted on a scale of 1–9 for each risk factor in terms of importance for early, late, and stillbirth at any gestation. Consensus for inclusion was reached if the median score was in the top tertile and at least two thirds of panellists had scored the risk factor within the top tertile.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-six risk factors were identified from an umbrella review and presented to stakeholders in round 1 of our e-Delphi survey. Round 1 was completed by 68 stakeholders, 79% (54/68) of whom went on to complete the second round. Seventeen risk factors were discussed at the consensus meeting. From the twenty-six risk factors identified, fifteen of these were prioritised for stillbirth at any gestation, eleven for early stillbirth, and sixteen for late stillbirth, across three domains of maternal characteristics, ultrasound markers and biochemical markers. The prioritised maternal characteristics common to early, late, and stillbirth at any gestation were: maternal age, smoking, drug misuse, history of heritable thrombophilia, hypertension, renal disease, diabetes, previous stillbirth and multiple pregnancy. Maternal BMI, access to healthcare, and socioeconomic status were prioritised for late stillbirth and stillbirth at any gestation. Previous pre-eclampsia and previous small for gestational age baby were prioritised for late stillbirth. Of the ultrasound markers, uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index and congenital fetal anomaly were prioritised for all. One biochemical marker, placental growth factor, was prioritised for stillbirth at any gestation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our prioritised risk factors for stillbirth can inform formal factor-outcome evaluation of early pregnancy risk factors to influence public health strategies on prevention of such risk factors to prevent stillbirth.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"302 ","pages":"Pages 201-205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211524005116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To identify and prioritise early pregnancy risk factors for stillbirth to inform prognostic factor and model research.

Study design

We used a modified e-Delphi method and consultation meeting to achieve consensus. Risk factors for early, late and stillbirth at any gestation identified from an umbrella review of risk factors for stillbirth were entered into a two-stage online Delphi survey with an international group of stakeholders made up of healthcare professionals and researchers.

The RAND/ University of California at Los Angeles appropriateness method was used to evaluate consensus. Responders voted on a scale of 1–9 for each risk factor in terms of importance for early, late, and stillbirth at any gestation. Consensus for inclusion was reached if the median score was in the top tertile and at least two thirds of panellists had scored the risk factor within the top tertile.

Results

Twenty-six risk factors were identified from an umbrella review and presented to stakeholders in round 1 of our e-Delphi survey. Round 1 was completed by 68 stakeholders, 79% (54/68) of whom went on to complete the second round. Seventeen risk factors were discussed at the consensus meeting. From the twenty-six risk factors identified, fifteen of these were prioritised for stillbirth at any gestation, eleven for early stillbirth, and sixteen for late stillbirth, across three domains of maternal characteristics, ultrasound markers and biochemical markers. The prioritised maternal characteristics common to early, late, and stillbirth at any gestation were: maternal age, smoking, drug misuse, history of heritable thrombophilia, hypertension, renal disease, diabetes, previous stillbirth and multiple pregnancy. Maternal BMI, access to healthcare, and socioeconomic status were prioritised for late stillbirth and stillbirth at any gestation. Previous pre-eclampsia and previous small for gestational age baby were prioritised for late stillbirth. Of the ultrasound markers, uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index and congenital fetal anomaly were prioritised for all. One biochemical marker, placental growth factor, was prioritised for stillbirth at any gestation.

Conclusions

Our prioritised risk factors for stillbirth can inform formal factor-outcome evaluation of early pregnancy risk factors to influence public health strategies on prevention of such risk factors to prevent stillbirth.

确定早孕死胎风险因素的优先次序:国际多方利益相关者修改后的电子德尔菲共识研究
研究设计我们采用改良的电子德尔菲法和咨询会议来达成共识。由医护人员和研究人员组成的国际利益相关者小组将从死产风险因素总览中确定的早产、晚产和任何妊娠期死产的风险因素输入到两阶段的在线德尔菲调查中。答卷者根据每个风险因素对任何妊娠期早产、晚产和死胎的重要性,以 1-9 分进行投票。如果中位数得分处于最高三分位,且至少三分之二的小组成员对风险因素的评分处于最高三分位,则达成了纳入共识。68 名利益相关者完成了第一轮调查,其中 79% (54/68)的利益相关者继续完成了第二轮调查。共识会议讨论了 17 个风险因素。在确定的 26 个风险因素中,有 15 个是任何妊娠期死胎的优先风险因素,11 个是早期死胎的优先风险因素,16 个是晚期死胎的优先风险因素,涉及孕产妇特征、超声标记和生化标记三个领域。早产、晚产和任何妊娠期死胎的产妇特征包括:产妇年龄、吸烟、药物滥用、遗传性血栓性疾病、高血压、肾病、糖尿病、死胎和多胎妊娠。对于晚期死胎和任何妊娠期死胎,优先考虑产妇体重指数、获得医疗保健的机会和社会经济地位。曾有先兆子痫和曾有小于胎龄儿是晚期死胎的优先考虑因素。在超声标记物中,子宫动脉多普勒搏动指数和先天性胎儿畸形是所有标记物的优先选择。结论我们对死胎风险因素的优先排序可为早期妊娠风险因素的正式因素-结果评估提供参考,从而影响预防此类风险因素以防止死胎的公共卫生策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
898
审稿时长
8.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信