Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram in patients aged ≥65 years with stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy

IF 3 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
{"title":"Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram in patients aged ≥65 years with stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2024.102067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This study aims to discern the efficacy and toxicity of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in older adults with stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and establish a prognostic nomogram for these patients.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>One hundred forty-two patients (aged ≥65 years) with clinically-confirmed stage I-II NSCLC treated with SBRT from 2009 to 2020 were enrolled in the study. Primary end points included overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), cumulative incidences of local failure (LF), regional failure (RF), distant failure (DF), and toxicity. A nomogram for OS was developed and validated internally using one thousand bootstrap resamplings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The median times to LF, RF, and DF were 22.1 months, 26.9 months and 24.1 months, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year PFS rates from the start of SBRT were 79.4 %, 53.1 %, and 38.9 %, respectively. Performance status, pre-SBRT platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and planning tumor volume (PTV) were predictive of PFS. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates from the start of SBRT were 90.8 %, 67.9 % and 47.6 %, respectively. In multivariate analysis, good performance status, a low level of pre-SBRT PLR, and small tumor size were associated with better prognosis, all of which were included in the nomogram. The model showed optimal discrimination, with a C-index of 0.651 and good calibration. The most common adverse reactions were grade 1–2, such as anemia, cough, and fatigue.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>SBRT is a reasonable treatment modality for early-stage NSCLC in older adults. It achieved good survival outcomes and low toxicity. The proposed nomogram may be able to estimate individual outcomes for these patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879406824001735","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This study aims to discern the efficacy and toxicity of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in older adults with stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and establish a prognostic nomogram for these patients.

Materials and Methods

One hundred forty-two patients (aged ≥65 years) with clinically-confirmed stage I-II NSCLC treated with SBRT from 2009 to 2020 were enrolled in the study. Primary end points included overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), cumulative incidences of local failure (LF), regional failure (RF), distant failure (DF), and toxicity. A nomogram for OS was developed and validated internally using one thousand bootstrap resamplings.

Results

The median times to LF, RF, and DF were 22.1 months, 26.9 months and 24.1 months, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year PFS rates from the start of SBRT were 79.4 %, 53.1 %, and 38.9 %, respectively. Performance status, pre-SBRT platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and planning tumor volume (PTV) were predictive of PFS. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates from the start of SBRT were 90.8 %, 67.9 % and 47.6 %, respectively. In multivariate analysis, good performance status, a low level of pre-SBRT PLR, and small tumor size were associated with better prognosis, all of which were included in the nomogram. The model showed optimal discrimination, with a C-index of 0.651 and good calibration. The most common adverse reactions were grade 1–2, such as anemia, cough, and fatigue.

Discussion

SBRT is a reasonable treatment modality for early-stage NSCLC in older adults. It achieved good survival outcomes and low toxicity. The proposed nomogram may be able to estimate individual outcomes for these patients.

在接受立体定向体放射治疗的≥65 岁 I-II 期非小细胞肺癌患者中开发并验证预后提名图
引言 本研究旨在探讨立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)对 I-II 期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)老年人的疗效和毒性,并为这些患者建立预后提名图。主要终点包括总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、局部失败(LF)、区域失败(RF)、远处失败(DF)和毒性的累积发生率。结果LF、RF和DF的中位时间分别为22.1个月、26.9个月和24.1个月。SBRT开始后的1年、3年和5年PFS率分别为79.4%、53.1%和38.9%。表现状态、SBRT 前血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)和规划肿瘤体积(PTV)是预测 PFS 的指标。SBRT开始后的1年、3年和5年OS率分别为90.8%、67.9%和47.6%。在多变量分析中,良好的表现状态、SBRT 前较低的 PLR 水平和较小的肿瘤尺寸与较好的预后相关,所有这些都被纳入了提名图。该模型显示出最佳的区分度,C指数为0.651,校准效果良好。最常见的不良反应为 1-2 级,如贫血、咳嗽和疲劳。SBRT是老年人早期NSCLC的一种合理治疗方式,具有良好的生存率和低毒性。所提出的提名图可能能够估算出这些患者的个体疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of geriatric oncology
Journal of geriatric oncology ONCOLOGY-GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
379
审稿时长
80 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geriatric Oncology is an international, multidisciplinary journal which is focused on advancing research in the treatment and survivorship issues of older adults with cancer, as well as literature relevant to education and policy development in geriatric oncology. The journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts in the following categories: • Original research articles • Review articles • Clinical trials • Education and training articles • Short communications • Perspectives • Meeting reports • Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信