High geological background concentrations of As and Cd in karstic soils may not contribute to greater risks to human health via rice consumption

IF 2.9 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Guobing Lin, Chao Zhang, Zhongfang Yang, Yong Li, Chenjing Liu, Lena Q. Ma
{"title":"High geological background concentrations of As and Cd in karstic soils may not contribute to greater risks to human health via rice consumption","authors":"Guobing Lin, Chao Zhang, Zhongfang Yang, Yong Li, Chenjing Liu, Lena Q. Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>High geological background concentrations of toxic metal(loid)s arsenic (As) and cadmium (Cd) from natural enrichment in soils of karst regions have attracted much attention. In this study, paired soil-rice samples were collected from karst and non-karst regions in Guangxi, China to assess the potential risks of metal(loid) transfer from soil to rice grains, and rice grains to humans. Our results indicate that the karstic soils had greater As (25.7 vs. 12.4<!-- --> <!-- -->mg·kg<sup>-1</sup>) and Cd (2.12 vs. 1.04<!-- --> <!-- -->mg·kg<sup>-1</sup>) contents than those in non-karstic soils. However, metal(loid) transfer from soil to rice grains (ratio of rice grains to soil content) of As and Cd was 40 and 49% lower in karst regions, which may relate to their 42 and 61% lower HNO<sub>3</sub>-extractable As and CaCl<sub>2</sub>-extractable Cd, resulting in similar As/Cd contents in karstic and non-karstic rice grains. In vitro assay using a modified physiologically-based extraction test showed that karstic rice grains had a lower As/Cd bioaccessibility than non-karstic grains, which can be attributed to their ~50% greater P content, which negatively correlated with As/Cd bioaccessibility. Additionally, karstic rice grains had 39% greater phytate and exhibited 45% and 9.4% lower As and Cd bioaccessibility in the gastric phase with phytate supplement at 0.6%. Our work indicates that despite the greater As/Cd contents in karstic soils, the risks of As/Cd transfer from soil to rice grains as well as their exposure risks to humans via rice consumption may not be greater than non-karst regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12,"journal":{"name":"ACS Chemical Health & Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Chemical Health & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High geological background concentrations of toxic metal(loid)s arsenic (As) and cadmium (Cd) from natural enrichment in soils of karst regions have attracted much attention. In this study, paired soil-rice samples were collected from karst and non-karst regions in Guangxi, China to assess the potential risks of metal(loid) transfer from soil to rice grains, and rice grains to humans. Our results indicate that the karstic soils had greater As (25.7 vs. 12.4 mg·kg-1) and Cd (2.12 vs. 1.04 mg·kg-1) contents than those in non-karstic soils. However, metal(loid) transfer from soil to rice grains (ratio of rice grains to soil content) of As and Cd was 40 and 49% lower in karst regions, which may relate to their 42 and 61% lower HNO3-extractable As and CaCl2-extractable Cd, resulting in similar As/Cd contents in karstic and non-karstic rice grains. In vitro assay using a modified physiologically-based extraction test showed that karstic rice grains had a lower As/Cd bioaccessibility than non-karstic grains, which can be attributed to their ~50% greater P content, which negatively correlated with As/Cd bioaccessibility. Additionally, karstic rice grains had 39% greater phytate and exhibited 45% and 9.4% lower As and Cd bioaccessibility in the gastric phase with phytate supplement at 0.6%. Our work indicates that despite the greater As/Cd contents in karstic soils, the risks of As/Cd transfer from soil to rice grains as well as their exposure risks to humans via rice consumption may not be greater than non-karst regions.

Abstract Image

岩溶土壤中砷和镉的地质背景浓度较高,可能不会导致食用大米对人类健康造成更大风险
岩溶地区土壤中天然富集的有毒金属砷(As)和镉(Cd)的高地质背景浓度引起了人们的广泛关注。本研究从中国广西的岩溶地区和非岩溶地区采集了成对的土壤-稻谷样本,以评估金属(loid)从土壤转移到稻谷以及稻谷转移到人体的潜在风险。结果表明,与非喀斯特土壤相比,喀斯特土壤中的砷含量(25.7 毫克/千克-1 对 12.4 毫克/千克-1)和镉含量(2.12 毫克/千克-1 对 1.04 毫克/千克-1)更高。然而,从土壤到稻粒的金属(loid)转移(稻粒与土壤含量之比),岩溶地区的砷和镉含量分别低 40% 和 49%,这可能与它们的 HNO3 可提取砷和 CaCl2 可提取镉含量分别低 42% 和 61% 有关,导致岩溶地区和非岩溶地区稻粒中的砷/镉含量相似。使用改进的生理萃取试验进行的体外检测表明,喀斯特稻谷的砷/镉生物可及性低于非喀斯特稻谷,这可能是因为喀斯特稻谷的磷含量比非喀斯特稻谷高出约 50%,而磷含量与砷/镉生物可及性呈负相关。此外,喀斯特米粒的植酸含量比非喀斯特米粒高 39%,在胃相中,植酸补充量为 0.6% 时,砷和镉的生物利用率分别低 45% 和 9.4%。我们的研究表明,尽管喀斯特土壤中的砷/镉含量较高,但砷/镉从土壤转移到米粒的风险以及人类通过食用大米接触砷/镉的风险可能并不比非喀斯特地区高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Chemical Health & Safety
ACS Chemical Health & Safety PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Health and Safety focuses on news, information, and ideas relating to issues and advances in chemical health and safety. The Journal of Chemical Health and Safety covers up-to-the minute, in-depth views of safety issues ranging from OSHA and EPA regulations to the safe handling of hazardous waste, from the latest innovations in effective chemical hygiene practices to the courts'' most recent rulings on safety-related lawsuits. The Journal of Chemical Health and Safety presents real-world information that health, safety and environmental professionals and others responsible for the safety of their workplaces can put to use right away, identifying potential and developing safety concerns before they do real harm.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信