Hospital-initiated palliative care interventions for adults with frailty: findings from a systematic review and narrative synthesis

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Phoebe Sharratt, Antony Zacharias, Amara Callistus Nwosu, Amy Gadoud
{"title":"Hospital-initiated palliative care interventions for adults with frailty: findings from a systematic review and narrative synthesis","authors":"Phoebe Sharratt, Antony Zacharias, Amara Callistus Nwosu, Amy Gadoud","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afae190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Adults with frailty have palliative care needs [1] but have disproportionately less access to palliative care services [2]. Frailty affects ~4000 patients admitted to hospital per day in the UK [3], making the hospital admission a unique opportunity to assess palliative care needs and deliver interventions. Objectives Synthesise the evidence regarding hospital palliative care (HPC) for patients with frailty. Narratively analyse the evidence regarding methods used to identify palliative care needs; types of palliative care interventions studied; and whether HPC improves outcomes. Methods Systematic literature review and narrative synthesis of experimental, observational and systematic review articles investigating palliative care interventions for hospitalised adults aged ≥65 years with frailty. Electronic search of five databases from database inception to 30 January 2023. Included studies analysed using narrative synthesis according to Popay et al [4]. Results 15 465 titles retrieved, 12 included. Three studies detailed how they identified palliative care needs; all three used prognostication e.g. the ‘surprise question’. Most papers (10/12) investigated specialist palliative care interventions. These interventions addressed a wider range of care needs than non-specialist interventions. Evidence suggested an improvement in some symptom burden and healthcare utilisation outcomes following HPC. Conclusion Prognostication was the main method of identifying palliative care needs, rather than individuals’ specific needs. Specialist palliative care interventions were more holistic, indicating that non-specialist palliative care approaches may benefit from specialist team input. Despite suggestions of improvement in some outcomes with palliative care, heterogenous evidence prevented establishment of conclusive effects.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae190","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Adults with frailty have palliative care needs [1] but have disproportionately less access to palliative care services [2]. Frailty affects ~4000 patients admitted to hospital per day in the UK [3], making the hospital admission a unique opportunity to assess palliative care needs and deliver interventions. Objectives Synthesise the evidence regarding hospital palliative care (HPC) for patients with frailty. Narratively analyse the evidence regarding methods used to identify palliative care needs; types of palliative care interventions studied; and whether HPC improves outcomes. Methods Systematic literature review and narrative synthesis of experimental, observational and systematic review articles investigating palliative care interventions for hospitalised adults aged ≥65 years with frailty. Electronic search of five databases from database inception to 30 January 2023. Included studies analysed using narrative synthesis according to Popay et al [4]. Results 15 465 titles retrieved, 12 included. Three studies detailed how they identified palliative care needs; all three used prognostication e.g. the ‘surprise question’. Most papers (10/12) investigated specialist palliative care interventions. These interventions addressed a wider range of care needs than non-specialist interventions. Evidence suggested an improvement in some symptom burden and healthcare utilisation outcomes following HPC. Conclusion Prognostication was the main method of identifying palliative care needs, rather than individuals’ specific needs. Specialist palliative care interventions were more holistic, indicating that non-specialist palliative care approaches may benefit from specialist team input. Despite suggestions of improvement in some outcomes with palliative care, heterogenous evidence prevented establishment of conclusive effects.
针对虚弱成人的由医院发起的姑息关怀干预:系统综述和叙述性综述的结果
背景 患有虚弱症的成年人有姑息关怀的需求[1],但获得姑息关怀服务的机会却少得不成比例[2]。在英国,每天约有 4000 名患者因体弱而入院[3],这使得入院成为评估姑息关怀需求和采取干预措施的独特机会。目标 综合有关针对虚弱患者的医院姑息关怀(HPC)的证据。叙述性地分析有关用于识别姑息关怀需求的方法、姑息关怀干预研究的类型以及 HPC 是否能改善疗效的证据。方法 对实验性、观察性和系统性综述性文章进行系统性文献综述和叙述性综述,这些文章调查了针对年龄≥65岁、身体虚弱的住院成人的姑息关怀干预措施。对五个数据库进行电子检索,检索时间从数据库建立之初至 2023 年 1 月 30 日。根据 Popay 等人[4]的方法,采用叙事综合法对纳入的研究进行分析。结果 检索到 15 465 篇文献,纳入 12 篇。三项研究详细介绍了如何确定姑息关怀需求;所有三项研究都使用了预后,如 "惊喜问题"。大多数论文(10/12 篇)调查了专业姑息关怀干预措施。与非专科干预相比,这些干预措施能满足更广泛的姑息关怀需求。有证据表明,采取姑息关怀干预措施后,某些症状负担和医疗服务利用率有所改善。结论 诊断是确定姑息关怀需求的主要方法,而不是个人的具体需求。专科姑息关怀干预更为全面,这表明非专科姑息关怀方法可能会受益于专科团队的投入。尽管有迹象表明姑息关怀改善了某些结果,但由于证据不一,无法确定最终效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信