Arthroscopic Centralization of the Medial Meniscus Reduces Load on a Posterior Root Repair Under Dynamic Varus Loading: A Biomechanical Investigation

Adrian Deichsel, Christian Peez, Michael J. Raschke, R. Geoff Richards, Boyko Gueorguiev, Ivan Zderic, Elmar Herbst, Christoph Kittl
{"title":"Arthroscopic Centralization of the Medial Meniscus Reduces Load on a Posterior Root Repair Under Dynamic Varus Loading: A Biomechanical Investigation","authors":"Adrian Deichsel, Christian Peez, Michael J. Raschke, R. Geoff Richards, Boyko Gueorguiev, Ivan Zderic, Elmar Herbst, Christoph Kittl","doi":"10.1177/03635465241274791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:In addition to the integrity of the meniscal hoop function, both the anterior and posterior meniscus roots as well as the meniscotibial and meniscofemoral ligaments are crucial in restraining meniscal extrusion. However, the interaction and load sharing between the roots and these peripheral attachments (PAs) are not known.Purposes:To investigate the influence of an insufficiency of the PAs on the forces acting on a posterior medial meniscus root repair (PMMRR) in both neutral and varus alignment and to explore whether meniscal centralization reduces these forces.Study Design:Controlled laboratory study.Methods:In 8 fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees, an arthroscopic transosseous root repair (step 1) was performed after sectioning the posterior root of the medial meniscus. The pull-out suture was connected to a load cell to allow measurement of the forces acting on the root repair. A medial closing-wedge distal femoral osteotomy was performed to change the mechanical axis from neutral to 5° of varus alignment. The meniscus was completely released from its PAs (step 2), followed by transosseous arthroscopic centralization (step 3). Each step was tested in both neutral and varus alignment. The specimens were subjected to nondestructive dynamic varus loading under axial compression of 300 N in 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60° flexion. The changes in force acting on the PMMRR were statistically analyzed using a mixed linear model.Results:Axial loading in neutral alignment led to an increase of the force of root repair of 3.1 ± 3.1 N (in 0° flexion) to 6.3 ± 4.4 N (in 60° flexion). In varus alignment, forces increased significantly from 30° (3.5 N; 95% CI, 1.1-5.8 N; P = .01) to 60° (7.1 N; 95% CI, 2.7-11.5 N; P = .007) flexion, in comparison with neutral alignment. Cutting of the PAs in neutral alignment led to a significant increase of root repair forces in all flexion angles, from 7.0 N (95% CI, 1.0-13.0 N; P = .02) to 9.1 N (95% CI, 4.1-14.1 N; P = .003), in comparison with the intact state. Varus alignment significantly increased the forces in the cut states from 4.8 N (95% CI, 1.0-8.5 N; P = .02) to 11.1 N (95% CI, 4.2-18.0 N; P = .006) from 30° to 60° flexion, in comparison with the neutral alignment. Arthroscopic centralization led to restoration of the native forces in both neutral and varus alignment, with no significant differences between the centralized and intact states.Conclusion:An insufficiency of the PAs of the medial meniscus, as well as varus alignment, led to increased forces acting on a PMMRR. These forces were reduced via an arthroscopic meniscal centralization.Clinical Relevance:Performing arthroscopic meniscal centralization concomitantly with PMMRR may reduce failure of the repair by reducing the load of the root.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241274791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:In addition to the integrity of the meniscal hoop function, both the anterior and posterior meniscus roots as well as the meniscotibial and meniscofemoral ligaments are crucial in restraining meniscal extrusion. However, the interaction and load sharing between the roots and these peripheral attachments (PAs) are not known.Purposes:To investigate the influence of an insufficiency of the PAs on the forces acting on a posterior medial meniscus root repair (PMMRR) in both neutral and varus alignment and to explore whether meniscal centralization reduces these forces.Study Design:Controlled laboratory study.Methods:In 8 fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees, an arthroscopic transosseous root repair (step 1) was performed after sectioning the posterior root of the medial meniscus. The pull-out suture was connected to a load cell to allow measurement of the forces acting on the root repair. A medial closing-wedge distal femoral osteotomy was performed to change the mechanical axis from neutral to 5° of varus alignment. The meniscus was completely released from its PAs (step 2), followed by transosseous arthroscopic centralization (step 3). Each step was tested in both neutral and varus alignment. The specimens were subjected to nondestructive dynamic varus loading under axial compression of 300 N in 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60° flexion. The changes in force acting on the PMMRR were statistically analyzed using a mixed linear model.Results:Axial loading in neutral alignment led to an increase of the force of root repair of 3.1 ± 3.1 N (in 0° flexion) to 6.3 ± 4.4 N (in 60° flexion). In varus alignment, forces increased significantly from 30° (3.5 N; 95% CI, 1.1-5.8 N; P = .01) to 60° (7.1 N; 95% CI, 2.7-11.5 N; P = .007) flexion, in comparison with neutral alignment. Cutting of the PAs in neutral alignment led to a significant increase of root repair forces in all flexion angles, from 7.0 N (95% CI, 1.0-13.0 N; P = .02) to 9.1 N (95% CI, 4.1-14.1 N; P = .003), in comparison with the intact state. Varus alignment significantly increased the forces in the cut states from 4.8 N (95% CI, 1.0-8.5 N; P = .02) to 11.1 N (95% CI, 4.2-18.0 N; P = .006) from 30° to 60° flexion, in comparison with the neutral alignment. Arthroscopic centralization led to restoration of the native forces in both neutral and varus alignment, with no significant differences between the centralized and intact states.Conclusion:An insufficiency of the PAs of the medial meniscus, as well as varus alignment, led to increased forces acting on a PMMRR. These forces were reduced via an arthroscopic meniscal centralization.Clinical Relevance:Performing arthroscopic meniscal centralization concomitantly with PMMRR may reduce failure of the repair by reducing the load of the root.
在关节镜下集中内侧半月板可减轻后根修复在动态变位加载下的负荷:生物力学研究
背景:除了半月板箍功能的完整性外,半月板前根和后根以及半月板胫韧带和半月板股韧带对抑制半月板挤压也至关重要。研究目的:研究半月板根部和外周附着物(PAs)之间的相互作用和负荷分担情况。研究设计:实验室对照研究。方法:在8个新鲜冷冻的人体尸体膝关节中,切开内侧半月板后根部后,进行关节镜下经骨膜根部修复(步骤1)。拉出的缝合线与载荷传感器相连,以便测量作用在修复根部上的力。进行了股骨远端内侧闭合楔形截骨术,将机械轴线从中性变为5°屈曲对齐。将半月板从其 PA 上完全释放(步骤 2),然后进行经骨关节镜集中(步骤 3)。每个步骤都在中性和屈曲对齐状态下进行测试。在 0°、15°、30°、45° 和 60°屈曲的情况下,对试样施加 300 N 的轴向压缩力,进行无损动态屈曲加载。采用混合线性模型对作用在 PMMRR 上的力的变化进行了统计分析。结果:在中性排列时,轴向加载导致根修复力从 3.1 ± 3.1 N(屈曲 0°)增加到 6.3 ± 4.4 N(屈曲 60°)。与中性对位相比,在屈曲 30°(3.5 N;95% CI,1.1-5.8 N;P = .01)至 60°(7.1 N;95% CI,2.7-11.5 N;P = .007)对位时,修复力明显增加。与完好状态相比,在中立对齐状态下切割 PA 会导致所有屈曲角度的根修复力显著增加,从 7.0 N(95% CI,1.0-13.0 N;P = .02)增加到 9.1 N(95% CI,4.1-14.1 N;P = .003)。与中性对齐方式相比,屈曲 30° 至 60° 期间,屈曲对齐方式可使切口状态下的力量从 4.8 牛顿(95% CI,1.0-8.5 牛顿;P = .02)明显增加到 11.1 牛顿(95% CI,4.2-18.0 牛顿;P = .006)。结论:内侧半月板PA的不足以及屈曲排列导致作用在PMMRR上的力增加。临床意义:在进行 PMMRR 的同时进行关节镜下半月板集中术,可通过减轻根部的负荷来减少修复失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信