Parasites disrupt a keystone mutualism that underpins the structure, functioning, and resilience of a coastal ecosystem

IF 7.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Joseph P. Morton, Brian P. Davis, Taylor A. Walker, India H. Haber, Eve H. Adelson, Brian R. Silliman
{"title":"Parasites disrupt a keystone mutualism that underpins the structure, functioning, and resilience of a coastal ecosystem","authors":"Joseph P. Morton,&nbsp;Brian P. Davis,&nbsp;Taylor A. Walker,&nbsp;India H. Haber,&nbsp;Eve H. Adelson,&nbsp;Brian R. Silliman","doi":"10.1002/ecm.1630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Parasites can alter the traits or densities of mutualistic partners, potentially destabilizing mutualistic associations that underpin the structure, functioning, and stability of entire ecosystems. Despite the potentially wide-ranging consequences of such disruptions, no studies have directly manipulated parasite prevalence and/or intensity in a mutualistic partner, nor quantified the resulting community-level effects. Here, we investigated the effects of a common trematode parasite (<i>Cercaria opaca</i>) on the strength of a keystone facultative mutualism in western Atlantic salt marshes between the foundational marsh cordgrass, <i>Spartina alterniflora</i>, and the ribbed mussel, <i>Geukensia demissa</i>. Cordgrass increases mussel survivorship and growth through shading, while mussels enhance cordgrass growth by producing nutrient-rich biodeposits. This mutualistic association also creates conditions that enhance biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, and mediates the ability of foundational plants to resist and recover from extreme drought. We used lab and field assays to show how increasing infection with trematode metacercariae negatively influenced mussel biodeposit production, as well as the strength of mussel shells and byssal attachments. By conducting a field manipulation using experimentally infected mussels, we demonstrated that the mutualistic benefits of mussels to cordgrass growth decreased with increasing trematode infection intensity—a pattern likely generated by reduced mussel biodeposition and enhanced mortality. Additionally, increasing parasite loads in mussels led to predictable decreases in the abundances of benthic invertebrates, as well as in key ecosystem characteristics and process rates (i.e., redox potential and sediment accretion). Finally, a survey of five North Carolina salt marshes demonstrated that infection with <i>C. opaca</i> was most common in mussels in areas experiencing cordgrass die-off due to drought, and that infection intensity decreased with distance from die-off areas. Because the mussel–cordgrass mutualism underpins marsh ecosystem resilience to drought-associated die-off, our results suggest that parasitism may depress recovery from these disturbances. Although this is the first experimental demonstration of parasites indirectly altering community structure and functioning by undermining an ecologically influential mutualism, this type of relationship could be common in nature, given that parasites frequently infect influential mutualists.</p>","PeriodicalId":11505,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Monographs","volume":"94 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecm.1630","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Parasites can alter the traits or densities of mutualistic partners, potentially destabilizing mutualistic associations that underpin the structure, functioning, and stability of entire ecosystems. Despite the potentially wide-ranging consequences of such disruptions, no studies have directly manipulated parasite prevalence and/or intensity in a mutualistic partner, nor quantified the resulting community-level effects. Here, we investigated the effects of a common trematode parasite (Cercaria opaca) on the strength of a keystone facultative mutualism in western Atlantic salt marshes between the foundational marsh cordgrass, Spartina alterniflora, and the ribbed mussel, Geukensia demissa. Cordgrass increases mussel survivorship and growth through shading, while mussels enhance cordgrass growth by producing nutrient-rich biodeposits. This mutualistic association also creates conditions that enhance biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, and mediates the ability of foundational plants to resist and recover from extreme drought. We used lab and field assays to show how increasing infection with trematode metacercariae negatively influenced mussel biodeposit production, as well as the strength of mussel shells and byssal attachments. By conducting a field manipulation using experimentally infected mussels, we demonstrated that the mutualistic benefits of mussels to cordgrass growth decreased with increasing trematode infection intensity—a pattern likely generated by reduced mussel biodeposition and enhanced mortality. Additionally, increasing parasite loads in mussels led to predictable decreases in the abundances of benthic invertebrates, as well as in key ecosystem characteristics and process rates (i.e., redox potential and sediment accretion). Finally, a survey of five North Carolina salt marshes demonstrated that infection with C. opaca was most common in mussels in areas experiencing cordgrass die-off due to drought, and that infection intensity decreased with distance from die-off areas. Because the mussel–cordgrass mutualism underpins marsh ecosystem resilience to drought-associated die-off, our results suggest that parasitism may depress recovery from these disturbances. Although this is the first experimental demonstration of parasites indirectly altering community structure and functioning by undermining an ecologically influential mutualism, this type of relationship could be common in nature, given that parasites frequently infect influential mutualists.

寄生虫破坏了支撑沿海生态系统结构、功能和恢复力的关键性互惠关系
寄生虫会改变互生伙伴的性状或密度,从而可能破坏互生关系的稳定,而互生关系是整个生态系统结构、功能和稳定性的基础。尽管这种破坏可能造成广泛的后果,但目前还没有研究直接操纵寄生虫在互生伙伴中的流行率和/或强度,也没有量化由此产生的群落级效应。在这里,我们研究了一种常见的吸虫寄生虫(Cercaria opaca)对大西洋西部盐沼中基础沼泽灯心草(Spartina alterniflora)和肋贻贝(Geukensia demissa)之间的基石互生关系强度的影响。灯心草通过遮荫提高贻贝的存活率和生长速度,而贻贝则通过产生营养丰富的生物沉积物促进灯心草的生长。这种互惠关系还创造了提高生物多样性和生态系统功能的条件,并增强了基础植物抵抗极端干旱和从极端干旱中恢复的能力。我们利用实验室和野外试验表明,吸虫感染的增加如何对贻贝生物沉积物的产生以及贻贝壳和底栖附着物的强度产生负面影响。通过使用受实验感染的贻贝进行实地操作,我们证明,随着吸虫感染强度的增加,贻贝对灯心草生长的互利性会降低--这种模式可能是由贻贝生物沉积减少和死亡率增加造成的。此外,贻贝体内寄生虫数量的增加也会导致底栖无脊椎动物数量以及关键生态系统特征和过程速率(即氧化还原电位和沉积物吸积)的下降。最后,对北卡罗来纳州五个盐沼的调查表明,在因干旱导致灯心草枯死的地区,贻贝感染 C. opaca 的情况最为普遍,而且感染强度随距离枯死区的距离而降低。由于贻贝与灯心草的互生关系是沼泽生态系统抵御干旱引起的枯死的基础,我们的研究结果表明,寄生虫可能会抑制沼泽生态系统从这些干扰中恢复过来。虽然这是寄生虫通过破坏具有生态影响力的互生关系间接改变群落结构和功能的首次实验证明,但鉴于寄生虫经常感染具有影响力的互生者,这种关系在自然界中可能很常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Monographs
Ecological Monographs 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The vision for Ecological Monographs is that it should be the place for publishing integrative, synthetic papers that elaborate new directions for the field of ecology. Original Research Papers published in Ecological Monographs will continue to document complex observational, experimental, or theoretical studies that by their very integrated nature defy dissolution into shorter publications focused on a single topic or message. Reviews will be comprehensive and synthetic papers that establish new benchmarks in the field, define directions for future research, contribute to fundamental understanding of ecological principles, and derive principles for ecological management in its broadest sense (including, but not limited to: conservation, mitigation, restoration, and pro-active protection of the environment). Reviews should reflect the full development of a topic and encompass relevant natural history, observational and experimental data, analyses, models, and theory. Reviews published in Ecological Monographs should further blur the boundaries between “basic” and “applied” ecology. Concepts and Synthesis papers will conceptually advance the field of ecology. These papers are expected to go well beyond works being reviewed and include discussion of new directions, new syntheses, and resolutions of old questions. In this world of rapid scientific advancement and never-ending environmental change, there needs to be room for the thoughtful integration of scientific ideas, data, and concepts that feeds the mind and guides the development of the maturing science of ecology. Ecological Monographs provides that room, with an expansive view to a sustainable future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信