Loredana R. Diaconu-Gherasim, Andrew J. Elliot, Alexandra S. Zancu, Laura E. Brumariu, Cornelia Măirean, Cristian Opariuc‑Dan, Irina Crumpei-Tanasă
{"title":"A Meta-Analysis of the Relations Between Achievement Goals and Internalizing Problems","authors":"Loredana R. Diaconu-Gherasim, Andrew J. Elliot, Alexandra S. Zancu, Laura E. Brumariu, Cornelia Măirean, Cristian Opariuc‑Dan, Irina Crumpei-Tanasă","doi":"10.1007/s10648-024-09943-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This systematic meta-analytic review investigated the relations between achievement goals and internalizing symptoms and disorders, namely, anxiety and depression. The number of samples for each focal relationship ranged from 3 to 36. The results indicated significant effect sizes for the relations between mastery-approach goals and anxiety (<i>r</i> = − .10) and depression (r = − .18), as well as performance-avoidance goals and anxiety (<i>r</i> = .25) and depression (<i>r</i> = .16). A significant effect size was also found for the relation between performance-approach goals and anxiety (<i>r</i> = .15), and a non-significant effect size was observed for the relation between performance-approach goals and depression (<i>r</i> = .05). Mastery-avoidance goals were not significantly related to either anxiety (<i>r</i> = .08) or depression (<i>r</i> = − .13). Several moderators representing the conceptualization of achievement goals (e.g., theoretical model), sample characteristics (e.g., education level), and methodology- and publication-based characteristics (e.g., year of publication) were significant, and suggested avenues for future research. These findings herein have implications for intervention programs that could focus on reducing the links between achievement goals and internalizing problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":48344,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology Review","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09943-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This systematic meta-analytic review investigated the relations between achievement goals and internalizing symptoms and disorders, namely, anxiety and depression. The number of samples for each focal relationship ranged from 3 to 36. The results indicated significant effect sizes for the relations between mastery-approach goals and anxiety (r = − .10) and depression (r = − .18), as well as performance-avoidance goals and anxiety (r = .25) and depression (r = .16). A significant effect size was also found for the relation between performance-approach goals and anxiety (r = .15), and a non-significant effect size was observed for the relation between performance-approach goals and depression (r = .05). Mastery-avoidance goals were not significantly related to either anxiety (r = .08) or depression (r = − .13). Several moderators representing the conceptualization of achievement goals (e.g., theoretical model), sample characteristics (e.g., education level), and methodology- and publication-based characteristics (e.g., year of publication) were significant, and suggested avenues for future research. These findings herein have implications for intervention programs that could focus on reducing the links between achievement goals and internalizing problems.
期刊介绍:
Educational Psychology Review aims to disseminate knowledge and promote dialogue within the field of educational psychology. It serves as a platform for the publication of various types of articles, including peer-reviewed integrative reviews, special thematic issues, reflections on previous research or new research directions, interviews, and research-based advice for practitioners. The journal caters to a diverse readership, ranging from generalists in educational psychology to experts in specific areas of the discipline. The content offers a comprehensive coverage of topics and provides in-depth information to meet the needs of both specialized researchers and practitioners.