Complementarity for nitrogen use in maize/faba bean intercropping with inoculation

IF 3.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Xiao-Fei Li, Ping Wang, Xiu-Li Tian, Nan Dong, Long Li
{"title":"Complementarity for nitrogen use in maize/faba bean intercropping with inoculation","authors":"Xiao-Fei Li, Ping Wang, Xiu-Li Tian, Nan Dong, Long Li","doi":"10.1007/s11104-024-06950-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background and aims</h3><p>Intercropping with legumes is beneficial for crop nitrogen (N) uptake, but the mechanism behind efficient N uptake in intercropping is not well understood. Therefore, this study aimed to measure the effect of crop diversity on N uptake in intercrop and to assess the mechanisms contributing to diversity effects.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>The N uptake on equivalent area basis was determined during 2012 to 2014 using a long-term experiment established in 2009 including faba bean/maize intercropping and corresponding monocultures. Complementarity effects (CE) and selection effects (SE) were calculated to assess N complementarity/facilitation and dominant species effects.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Faba bean/maize intercropping had 17.6% greater system N uptake than weighted means of two monocultures. The fertilizer-N rate required to achieve the maximum total N uptake was 300 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup> without inoculation and was 225 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup> with inoculation. Similar results were observed for biological N fixation of faba bean. Enhanced N uptake from intercropping compared with monoculture was strongly and positively correlated with the CE, but not correlated with the SE. In addition, N fixation accounted for approximately 20% of the positive CE in faba bean/maize intercropping.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>N complementarity and/or facilitation drove the increased N uptake in faba bean/maize intercropping. The results highlight the role of applying microbial inoculants to increase crop N uptake while reducing reliance on fertilizer N especially in newly reclaimed desert soils, and may also be useful for guiding the design of intercropping systems with complementary traits for efficient N use.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-06950-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

Intercropping with legumes is beneficial for crop nitrogen (N) uptake, but the mechanism behind efficient N uptake in intercropping is not well understood. Therefore, this study aimed to measure the effect of crop diversity on N uptake in intercrop and to assess the mechanisms contributing to diversity effects.

Methods

The N uptake on equivalent area basis was determined during 2012 to 2014 using a long-term experiment established in 2009 including faba bean/maize intercropping and corresponding monocultures. Complementarity effects (CE) and selection effects (SE) were calculated to assess N complementarity/facilitation and dominant species effects.

Results

Faba bean/maize intercropping had 17.6% greater system N uptake than weighted means of two monocultures. The fertilizer-N rate required to achieve the maximum total N uptake was 300 kg N ha–1 without inoculation and was 225 kg N ha–1 with inoculation. Similar results were observed for biological N fixation of faba bean. Enhanced N uptake from intercropping compared with monoculture was strongly and positively correlated with the CE, but not correlated with the SE. In addition, N fixation accounted for approximately 20% of the positive CE in faba bean/maize intercropping.

Conclusions

N complementarity and/or facilitation drove the increased N uptake in faba bean/maize intercropping. The results highlight the role of applying microbial inoculants to increase crop N uptake while reducing reliance on fertilizer N especially in newly reclaimed desert soils, and may also be useful for guiding the design of intercropping systems with complementary traits for efficient N use.

Abstract Image

玉米/蚕豆间作与接种的氮素利用互补性
背景和目的与豆科植物间作有利于作物对氮(N)的吸收,但对间作高效吸收氮背后的机制还不甚了解。因此,本研究旨在测量作物多样性对间作氮吸收的影响,并评估多样性效应的作用机制。方法在 2012 年至 2014 年期间,利用 2009 年建立的一项长期实验(包括蚕豆/玉米间作和相应的单作)测定了等效面积的氮吸收量。计算了互补效应(CE)和选择效应(SE),以评估氮的互补/促进作用和优势物种效应。结果 蚕豆/玉米间作的系统氮吸收量比两种单一作物的加权平均值高出 17.6%。在不接种的情况下,实现最大总吸氮量所需的肥料-氮比率为每公顷 300 千克氮,而在接种的情况下为每公顷 225 千克氮。蚕豆的生物固氮也观察到了类似的结果。与单作相比,间作所增加的氮吸收量与CE呈强正相关,但与SE无关。此外,氮固定约占蚕豆/玉米间作正 CE 的 20%。这些结果突显了在新开垦的沙漠土壤中应用微生物接种剂在增加作物氮吸收量的同时减少对化肥氮依赖的作用,也有助于指导设计具有互补特性的间作系统,以实现氮的高效利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant and Soil
Plant and Soil 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信