Timing embryo transfers during assisted reproduction

The BMJ Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1136/bmj.q1910
Demián Glujovsky
{"title":"Timing embryo transfers during assisted reproduction","authors":"Demián Glujovsky","doi":"10.1136/bmj.q1910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New evidence will help women and clinicians navigate this difficult decision In assisted reproductive technology, the timing of embryo transfer after oocyte retrieval and in vitro fertilisation is crucial. Traditionally, embryos have been transferred at the cleavage stage (two or three days post-fertilisation). However, transferring embryos at the blastocyst stage (five or six days post-fertilisation) is increasingly common. Most studies focus on outcomes from fresh embryo transfers, often overlooking the potential of surplus frozen embryos. Additionally, the effect of transfer stage on obstetric and neonatal outcomes has been underexplored. The linked study by Cornelisse and colleagues (doi:10.1136/bmj-2024-080133) therefore represents an important advance in this area.1 Their multicentre, randomised controlled trial (n=1202) compared outcomes over 12 months after embryo transfers on day 3 or day 5, analysing all embryo transfers within that timeframe. The study’s thorough approach, which assessed cumulative live birth rates—including both fresh and frozen embryo transfers from a single oocyte retrieval—as well as obstetric complications, distinguishes it from previous research. The study found no difference in cumulative live birth rates (risk ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.22), whereas live birth …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q1910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

New evidence will help women and clinicians navigate this difficult decision In assisted reproductive technology, the timing of embryo transfer after oocyte retrieval and in vitro fertilisation is crucial. Traditionally, embryos have been transferred at the cleavage stage (two or three days post-fertilisation). However, transferring embryos at the blastocyst stage (five or six days post-fertilisation) is increasingly common. Most studies focus on outcomes from fresh embryo transfers, often overlooking the potential of surplus frozen embryos. Additionally, the effect of transfer stage on obstetric and neonatal outcomes has been underexplored. The linked study by Cornelisse and colleagues (doi:10.1136/bmj-2024-080133) therefore represents an important advance in this area.1 Their multicentre, randomised controlled trial (n=1202) compared outcomes over 12 months after embryo transfers on day 3 or day 5, analysing all embryo transfers within that timeframe. The study’s thorough approach, which assessed cumulative live birth rates—including both fresh and frozen embryo transfers from a single oocyte retrieval—as well as obstetric complications, distinguishes it from previous research. The study found no difference in cumulative live birth rates (risk ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.22), whereas live birth …
把握辅助生殖过程中胚胎移植的时机
新证据将帮助妇女和临床医生做出这一艰难的决定 在辅助生殖技术中,卵母细胞提取和体外受精后的胚胎移植时间至关重要。传统上,胚胎移植是在胚胎裂解阶段(受精后两三天)进行的。不过,在囊胚期(受精后五六天)移植胚胎的情况越来越普遍。大多数研究侧重于新鲜胚胎移植的结果,往往忽略了多余冷冻胚胎的潜力。此外,移植阶段对产科和新生儿结局的影响也未得到充分探讨。因此,Cornelisse 及其同事的相关研究(doi:10.1136/bmj-2024-080133)代表了这一领域的重要进展。1 他们的多中心随机对照试验(n=1202)比较了第 3 天或第 5 天胚胎移植后 12 个月内的结果,分析了该时间段内的所有胚胎移植。该研究采用了全面的方法,评估了累积活产率(包括从单次卵母细胞取回中移植的新鲜胚胎和冷冻胚胎)以及产科并发症,这使其有别于以往的研究。研究发现,累积活产率没有差异(风险比 1.01,95% 置信区间 (CI) 0.84 至 1.22),而活产率...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信