On the Association of Substorm Identification Methods

IF 2.6 2区 地球科学 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
C. J. Lao, C. Forsyth, M. P. Freeman, A. W. Smith, M. K. Mooney
{"title":"On the Association of Substorm Identification Methods","authors":"C. J. Lao,&nbsp;C. Forsyth,&nbsp;M. P. Freeman,&nbsp;A. W. Smith,&nbsp;M. K. Mooney","doi":"10.1029/2024JA032762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Substorms are a rapid release of energy that is redistributed throughout the magnetosphere-ionosphere system, resulting in many observable signals, such as enhancements in the aurora, energetic particle injections, and ground magnetic field perturbations. Numerous substorm identification techniques and onset lists based on each of these signals have been provided in the literature, but often with no cross-calibration. Since the signals produced are not necessarily unique to substorms and may not be sufficiently similar to be identified for each and every substorm, individual event lists may miss or misidentify substorms, hindering our understanding and the development and validation of substorm models. To gauge the scale of this problem, we use metrics derived from contingency tables to quantify the association between lists of substorms derived from SuperMAG SML/SMU indices, midlatitude magnetometer data, particle injections, and auroral enhancements. Overall, although some degree of pairwise association is found between the lists, even lists generated by applying conceptually similar gradient-based identification to ground magnetometer data achieve an association with less than 50% event coincidence. We discuss possible explanations of the levels of association seen from our results, as well as their implications for substorm analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":15894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JA032762","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JA032762","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Substorms are a rapid release of energy that is redistributed throughout the magnetosphere-ionosphere system, resulting in many observable signals, such as enhancements in the aurora, energetic particle injections, and ground magnetic field perturbations. Numerous substorm identification techniques and onset lists based on each of these signals have been provided in the literature, but often with no cross-calibration. Since the signals produced are not necessarily unique to substorms and may not be sufficiently similar to be identified for each and every substorm, individual event lists may miss or misidentify substorms, hindering our understanding and the development and validation of substorm models. To gauge the scale of this problem, we use metrics derived from contingency tables to quantify the association between lists of substorms derived from SuperMAG SML/SMU indices, midlatitude magnetometer data, particle injections, and auroral enhancements. Overall, although some degree of pairwise association is found between the lists, even lists generated by applying conceptually similar gradient-based identification to ground magnetometer data achieve an association with less than 50% event coincidence. We discuss possible explanations of the levels of association seen from our results, as well as their implications for substorm analyses.

Abstract Image

子风暴识别方法的关联
亚暴是一种能量的快速释放,它在整个磁层-电离层系统中重新分配,产生许多可观测到的信号,如极光增强、高能粒子注入和地面磁场扰动。文献中提供了大量基于这些信号的亚暴识别技术和起始列表,但通常没有交叉校准。由于所产生的信号并不一定是亚暴所独有的,也可能不够相似,无法识别每一个亚暴,因此单个事件列表可能会遗漏或错误识别亚暴,从而阻碍我们对亚暴的理解以及亚暴模式的开发和验证。为了衡量这个问题的严重程度,我们使用了从或然率表中得出的指标,来量化从超级大气监测仪 SML/SMU 指数、中纬度磁强计数据、粒子注入和极光增强中得出的亚暴列表之间的关联。总体而言,虽然这些列表之间存在一定程度的成对关联,但即使是通过对地面磁强计数据进行概念上相似的梯度识别而生成的列表,其关联度也不到事件重合度的 50%。我们将讨论从我们的结果中看到的关联程度的可能解释,以及它们对亚暴分析的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
35.70%
发文量
570
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信