Dimension matters: precision and incompatibility in multi-parameter quantum estimation models

IF 5.6 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Alessandro Candeloro, Zahra Pazhotan and Matteo G A Paris
{"title":"Dimension matters: precision and incompatibility in multi-parameter quantum estimation models","authors":"Alessandro Candeloro, Zahra Pazhotan and Matteo G A Paris","doi":"10.1088/2058-9565/ad7498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the role of probe dimension in determining the bounds of precision and the level of incompatibility in multi-parameter quantum estimation problems. In particular, we focus on the paradigmatic case of unitary encoding generated by and compare precision and incompatibility in the estimation of the same parameters across representations of different dimensions. For two- and three-parameter unitary models, we prove that if the dimension of the probe is smaller than the number of parameters, then simultaneous estimation is not possible (the quantum Fisher matrix is singular). If the dimension is equal to the number of parameters, estimation is possible but the model exhibits maximal (asymptotic) incompatibility. However, for larger dimensions, there is always a state for which the incompatibility vanishes, and the symmetric Cramér-Rao bound is achievable. We also critically examine the performance of the so-called asymptotic incompatibility (AI) in characterising the difference between the Holevo-Cramér-Rao bound and the Symmetric Logarithmic Derivative one, showing that the AI measure alone may fail to adequately quantify this gap. Assessing the determinant of the Quantum Fisher Information Matrix is crucial for a precise characterisation of the model’s nature. Nonetheless, the AI measure still plays a relevant role since it encapsulates the non-classicality of the model in one scalar quantity rather than in a matrix form (i.e. the Uhlmann curvature).","PeriodicalId":20821,"journal":{"name":"Quantum Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantum Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ad7498","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We study the role of probe dimension in determining the bounds of precision and the level of incompatibility in multi-parameter quantum estimation problems. In particular, we focus on the paradigmatic case of unitary encoding generated by and compare precision and incompatibility in the estimation of the same parameters across representations of different dimensions. For two- and three-parameter unitary models, we prove that if the dimension of the probe is smaller than the number of parameters, then simultaneous estimation is not possible (the quantum Fisher matrix is singular). If the dimension is equal to the number of parameters, estimation is possible but the model exhibits maximal (asymptotic) incompatibility. However, for larger dimensions, there is always a state for which the incompatibility vanishes, and the symmetric Cramér-Rao bound is achievable. We also critically examine the performance of the so-called asymptotic incompatibility (AI) in characterising the difference between the Holevo-Cramér-Rao bound and the Symmetric Logarithmic Derivative one, showing that the AI measure alone may fail to adequately quantify this gap. Assessing the determinant of the Quantum Fisher Information Matrix is crucial for a precise characterisation of the model’s nature. Nonetheless, the AI measure still plays a relevant role since it encapsulates the non-classicality of the model in one scalar quantity rather than in a matrix form (i.e. the Uhlmann curvature).
维度问题:多参数量子估算模型中的精度与不兼容性
我们研究了探测维度在多参数量子估计问题中决定精度界限和不相容程度的作用。特别是,我们将重点放在由单元编码生成的典型案例上,并比较不同维度的表征在估计相同参数时的精度和不兼容性。对于两参数和三参数单元模型,我们证明,如果探针的维度小于参数数,那么同步估计是不可能的(量子费雪矩阵是奇异的)。如果维数等于参数数,则可以进行估计,但模型会表现出最大(渐近)不相容性。然而,对于更大的维度,总有一种不相容消失的状态,对称克拉梅-拉奥约束是可以实现的。我们还批判性地考察了所谓渐进不相容(AI)在描述 Holevo-Cramér-Rao 约束与对称对数衍射约束之间的差异时的表现,结果表明仅用 AI 度量可能无法充分量化这一差距。评估量子费雪信息矩阵的行列式对于精确描述模型的性质至关重要。尽管如此,人工智能度量仍然发挥着重要作用,因为它以一个标量而不是矩阵形式(即乌尔曼曲率)概括了模型的非经典性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quantum Science and Technology
Quantum Science and Technology Materials Science-Materials Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Driven by advances in technology and experimental capability, the last decade has seen the emergence of quantum technology: a new praxis for controlling the quantum world. It is now possible to engineer complex, multi-component systems that merge the once distinct fields of quantum optics and condensed matter physics. Quantum Science and Technology is a new multidisciplinary, electronic-only journal, devoted to publishing research of the highest quality and impact covering theoretical and experimental advances in the fundamental science and application of all quantum-enabled technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信