Resistance differences of representative model microorganisms in different disinfection processes: ZIF-67, UVC and ozone

Q1 Environmental Science
Xiang Zheng , Qingwen Yang , Jincheng Xia , Rong Cheng , Haiyan Li , Jianzhong Zheng
{"title":"Resistance differences of representative model microorganisms in different disinfection processes: ZIF-67, UVC and ozone","authors":"Xiang Zheng ,&nbsp;Qingwen Yang ,&nbsp;Jincheng Xia ,&nbsp;Rong Cheng ,&nbsp;Haiyan Li ,&nbsp;Jianzhong Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.watcyc.2024.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Due to their inherent nature, each type of microorganism exhibits unique resistance to various disinfection processes. Disinfection with nanomaterials represents a promising technology that has garnered significant interest. Among them, ZIF material has antibacterial and antiviral activities, and ZIF-67 material is a new type of nanomaterial that can effectively kill bacteria and viruses, with the potential for large-scale use. Therefore, in this paper, we investigate the differences between nanomaterial disinfection techniques (employing ZIF-67) and traditional inactivation techniques (e.g., ultraviolet-C and ozone). Phage MS2 and PhiX174 and their respective host <em>E. coli</em> were chosen as the representative microorganisms. Our findings indicate that phages exhibit greater resistance to ZIF-67 and traditional disinfection techniques than bacteria, but different techniques show specific disinfection effects on the three disinfection microorganisms. Considering the differences, choosing appropriate disinfection techniques based on the characteristics of the disinfected substances in practical disinfection technology selection is essential.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34143,"journal":{"name":"Water Cycle","volume":"5 ","pages":"Pages 259-265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666445324000230/pdfft?md5=b48c836232f862177d091469757c2114&pid=1-s2.0-S2666445324000230-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Cycle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666445324000230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to their inherent nature, each type of microorganism exhibits unique resistance to various disinfection processes. Disinfection with nanomaterials represents a promising technology that has garnered significant interest. Among them, ZIF material has antibacterial and antiviral activities, and ZIF-67 material is a new type of nanomaterial that can effectively kill bacteria and viruses, with the potential for large-scale use. Therefore, in this paper, we investigate the differences between nanomaterial disinfection techniques (employing ZIF-67) and traditional inactivation techniques (e.g., ultraviolet-C and ozone). Phage MS2 and PhiX174 and their respective host E. coli were chosen as the representative microorganisms. Our findings indicate that phages exhibit greater resistance to ZIF-67 and traditional disinfection techniques than bacteria, but different techniques show specific disinfection effects on the three disinfection microorganisms. Considering the differences, choosing appropriate disinfection techniques based on the characteristics of the disinfected substances in practical disinfection technology selection is essential.

代表性模式微生物在不同消毒过程中的抗药性差异:ZIF-67、紫外线和臭氧
由于其固有的特性,每种微生物都对各种消毒过程表现出独特的抵抗力。使用纳米材料进行消毒是一项前景广阔的技术,已引起人们的极大兴趣。其中,ZIF 材料具有抗菌和抗病毒活性,而 ZIF-67 材料是一种新型纳米材料,能有效杀灭细菌和病毒,具有大规模使用的潜力。因此,本文研究了纳米材料消毒技术(采用 ZIF-67)与传统灭活技术(如紫外线-C 和臭氧)之间的差异。我们选择噬菌体 MS2 和 PhiX174 及其各自的宿主大肠杆菌作为代表性微生物。我们的研究结果表明,与细菌相比,噬菌体对 ZIF-67 和传统消毒技术表现出更强的抵抗力,但不同的消毒技术对三种消毒微生物有特定的消毒效果。考虑到这些差异,在实际消毒技术选择中,根据被消毒物质的特性选择适当的消毒技术至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water Cycle
Water Cycle Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
45 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信