{"title":"11-Year Experience With Midline Extraperitoneal Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Germ Cell Tumors.","authors":"Muhannad Alsyouf,Alireza Ghoreifi,Arman Ashrafi,Seyedeh-Sanam Ladi-Seyedian,Hamed Ahmadi,Madeleine Burg,Antoin Douglawi,Qi Nie,Ming Li,Sumeet Bhanvadia,Anne Schuckman,Hooman Djaladat,Siamak Daneshmand","doi":"10.1097/ju.0000000000004246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nA midline extraperitoneal approach for retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (EP-RPLND) has been associated with decreased morbidity compared to transperitoneal approach. We aimed to review our 11-year experience in patients with germ cell tumors (GCT) who underwent EP-RPLND at a single institution.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nAll patients with GCT who underwent EP-RPLND between 2010 to 2021 were reviewed. Surgical, peri-operative, and oncologic outcomes were reported. A logistic regression model was developed to evaluate variables predictive of early discharge. Oncologic outcomes included recurrence free survival (2-year RFS) and recurrence patterns, which were analyzed according to pathology.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOverall, 237 patients underwent EP-RPLND, of which 72% were in the post-chemotherapy (PC) setting. Median follow-up was 16.7(IQR 3.9-39.6) months. Median size of retroperitoneal disease was 2.8 (1.8-5.4)cm, of which 16 cases were > 10 cm. There were no cases of postoperative ileus or readmission due to small bowel obstruction. Median hospital stay was 2(IQR 1-3) days. From 2020 to 2021, 73% of patients were discharged on POD1 and 89% by POD2. Thirty-one complications occurred, including 4% grade III-IV. In the primary setting, 2-year RFS for seminoma and NSGCT were 0.93 (95% CI 0.84-1.00) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.72-1.00); respectively. In the PC setting, 2-year RFS for seminoma and NSGCT were 0.88 (95% CI 0.74-1.00) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.81-0.95); respectively. Overall, only 7 patients had in-field recurrence.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nMidline EP-RPLND is safe, associated with rapid gastrointestinal recovery, short hospital stay, and low complication rates. It also demonstrates acceptable oncologic outcomes in the primary and post-chemotherapy settings, with low rates of in-field relapse.","PeriodicalId":501636,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Urology","volume":"46 1","pages":"101097JU0000000000004246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000004246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
PURPOSE
A midline extraperitoneal approach for retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (EP-RPLND) has been associated with decreased morbidity compared to transperitoneal approach. We aimed to review our 11-year experience in patients with germ cell tumors (GCT) who underwent EP-RPLND at a single institution.
METHODS
All patients with GCT who underwent EP-RPLND between 2010 to 2021 were reviewed. Surgical, peri-operative, and oncologic outcomes were reported. A logistic regression model was developed to evaluate variables predictive of early discharge. Oncologic outcomes included recurrence free survival (2-year RFS) and recurrence patterns, which were analyzed according to pathology.
RESULTS
Overall, 237 patients underwent EP-RPLND, of which 72% were in the post-chemotherapy (PC) setting. Median follow-up was 16.7(IQR 3.9-39.6) months. Median size of retroperitoneal disease was 2.8 (1.8-5.4)cm, of which 16 cases were > 10 cm. There were no cases of postoperative ileus or readmission due to small bowel obstruction. Median hospital stay was 2(IQR 1-3) days. From 2020 to 2021, 73% of patients were discharged on POD1 and 89% by POD2. Thirty-one complications occurred, including 4% grade III-IV. In the primary setting, 2-year RFS for seminoma and NSGCT were 0.93 (95% CI 0.84-1.00) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.72-1.00); respectively. In the PC setting, 2-year RFS for seminoma and NSGCT were 0.88 (95% CI 0.74-1.00) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.81-0.95); respectively. Overall, only 7 patients had in-field recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS
Midline EP-RPLND is safe, associated with rapid gastrointestinal recovery, short hospital stay, and low complication rates. It also demonstrates acceptable oncologic outcomes in the primary and post-chemotherapy settings, with low rates of in-field relapse.