A Scoping Review of Intimate Partner Violence Research in Canada

IF 5.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
C. Nadine Wathen, Jennifer C.D. MacGregor, Caitlin Burd, Najibullah Naeemzadah, Yetunde A. Ogunpitan, Jaimeson Canie
{"title":"A Scoping Review of Intimate Partner Violence Research in Canada","authors":"C. Nadine Wathen, Jennifer C.D. MacGregor, Caitlin Burd, Najibullah Naeemzadah, Yetunde A. Ogunpitan, Jaimeson Canie","doi":"10.1177/15248380241275979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intimate partner violence (IPV) is at epidemic levels across low-, middle-, and high-income countries, including Canada, where recent lifetime prevalence indicated that over 40% of women had IPV experiences. In response to this, Canada’s federal government has made investments toward IPV prevention and response. We conducted a scoping review of English and French literature identified through searches of multiple databases and specific journals to assess the current state of IPV research in Canada. A total of 267 articles met inclusion criteria of being peer-reviewed research primarily about IPV in either French or English published from 2020 to 2022 with at least one Canadian-affiliated author. Almost a third of studies described services for survivors but did not evaluate service effectiveness. We noted a significant gap in research on the IPV experiences of gender and/or sexual minorities. Canada’s federal social science research funding agency was the most common funder, with the two federal government departments with specific IPV funding initiatives in place cited as funding less than 6% of included studies. In general, there remains an overfocus on IPV epidemiology and on descriptions of service use, and not enough research examining the effectiveness and implementation of interventions, especially grounded in theoretical, gendered, and trauma- and violence-informed frameworks. Funders and researchers are encouraged to consider moving resources from ongoing description of well-established factors to assessment and implementation of evidence-informed interventions, and, crucially, primary prevention of IPV and all forms of gender-based violence.","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241275979","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is at epidemic levels across low-, middle-, and high-income countries, including Canada, where recent lifetime prevalence indicated that over 40% of women had IPV experiences. In response to this, Canada’s federal government has made investments toward IPV prevention and response. We conducted a scoping review of English and French literature identified through searches of multiple databases and specific journals to assess the current state of IPV research in Canada. A total of 267 articles met inclusion criteria of being peer-reviewed research primarily about IPV in either French or English published from 2020 to 2022 with at least one Canadian-affiliated author. Almost a third of studies described services for survivors but did not evaluate service effectiveness. We noted a significant gap in research on the IPV experiences of gender and/or sexual minorities. Canada’s federal social science research funding agency was the most common funder, with the two federal government departments with specific IPV funding initiatives in place cited as funding less than 6% of included studies. In general, there remains an overfocus on IPV epidemiology and on descriptions of service use, and not enough research examining the effectiveness and implementation of interventions, especially grounded in theoretical, gendered, and trauma- and violence-informed frameworks. Funders and researchers are encouraged to consider moving resources from ongoing description of well-established factors to assessment and implementation of evidence-informed interventions, and, crucially, primary prevention of IPV and all forms of gender-based violence.
加拿大亲密伴侣暴力研究范围审查
亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)在包括加拿大在内的低收入、中等收入和高收入国家处于流行水平,最近的终生流行率显示,加拿大有超过 40% 的妇女遭受过 IPV。为此,加拿大联邦政府已对 IPV 的预防和应对进行了投资。我们对通过多个数据库和特定期刊搜索到的英文和法文文献进行了范围审查,以评估加拿大 IPV 研究的现状。共有 267 篇文章符合纳入标准,即在 2020 年至 2022 年期间发表的主要关于 IPV 的法文或英文同行评审研究,且至少有一位作者为加拿大人。近三分之一的研究介绍了为幸存者提供的服务,但并未对服务效果进行评估。我们注意到,有关性别和/或性少数群体遭受 IPV 的经历的研究存在巨大缺口。加拿大联邦社会科学研究资助机构是最常见的资助机构,而联邦政府的两个部门制定了专门的 IPV 资助计划,但只资助了不到 6% 的研究。总体而言,人们仍然过度关注 IPV 流行病学和服务使用情况的描述,而对干预措施的有效性和实施情况的研究不足,特别是基于理论、性别、创伤和暴力框架的干预措施。我们鼓励资助者和研究人员考虑将资源从对既定因素的持续描述转移到对有实证依据的干预措施的评估和实施上,更重要的是,转移到对 IPV 和所有形式的性别暴力的初级预防上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
7.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is devoted to organizing, synthesizing, and expanding knowledge on all force of trauma, abuse, and violence. This peer-reviewed journal is practitioner oriented and will publish only reviews of research, conceptual or theoretical articles, and law review articles. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is dedicated to professionals and advanced students in clinical training who work with any form of trauma, abuse, and violence. It is intended to compile knowledge that clearly affects practice, policy, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信