Primary site surgical resection in cM1 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Aman M. Patel BS, Afash Haleem BA, Lucy Revercomb BS, Jason A. Brant MD, Karthik Rajasekaran MD, Lova L. Sun MD, MSCE, Robert M. Brody MD, Ryan M. Carey MD
{"title":"Primary site surgical resection in cM1 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma","authors":"Aman M. Patel BS,&nbsp;Afash Haleem BA,&nbsp;Lucy Revercomb BS,&nbsp;Jason A. Brant MD,&nbsp;Karthik Rajasekaran MD,&nbsp;Lova L. Sun MD, MSCE,&nbsp;Robert M. Brody MD,&nbsp;Ryan M. Carey MD","doi":"10.1002/lio2.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate primary site surgical resection and overall survival (OS) in clinically distantly metastatic (cM1) oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The 2006–2018 National Cancer Database was queried for patients presenting with cM1 OCSCC who underwent chemotherapy. Binary logistic, Kaplan–Meier, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were implemented.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 278 patients satisfying inclusion criteria, 139 (50.0%) underwent chemotherapy alone, 80 (28.8%) underwent chemoradiotherapy, 25 (9.0%) underwent surgical resection + adjuvant chemotherapy, and 34 (12.2%) underwent surgical resection + adjuvant chemoradiotherapy; 5-year OS was 9.4%, 15.2%, 8.3%, and 23.8%, respectively (<i>p</i> &lt; .001). Compared with those not undergoing surgical resection, patients undergoing surgical resection underwent radiotherapy more frequently (57.6% vs. 36.5%) but multiple-agent chemotherapy less frequently (40.7% vs. 74.4%) (<i>p</i> &lt; .005). Twenty-one (36.2%) patients undergoing surgical resection had positive surgical margins. Academic facility (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.19, 95% CI 1.54–6.62) and Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score ≥1 (aOR 2.82, 95% CI 1.25–6.32, <i>p</i> &lt; .025) were associated with increased odds of undergoing surgical resection. Compared with chemotherapy alone, chemoradiotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.56, 95% CI 0.38–0.83) and surgical resection + adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (aHR 0.37, 95% CI 0.21–0.66) were associated with higher OS (<i>p</i> &lt; .005). Immunotherapy (aHR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28–0.81, <i>p</i> = .006) was also independently associated with higher OS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A minority of patients with cM1 OCSCC underwent primary site surgical resection. Despite the high rate of positive surgical margins, surgical resection + adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was associated with higher OS than chemotherapy alone, chemoradiotherapy, or surgical resection + adjuvant chemotherapy. Definitive local therapy may benefit select patients with cM1 OCSCC.</p>\n \n <p>Level of evidence: 4.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70000","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate primary site surgical resection and overall survival (OS) in clinically distantly metastatic (cM1) oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC).

Methods

The 2006–2018 National Cancer Database was queried for patients presenting with cM1 OCSCC who underwent chemotherapy. Binary logistic, Kaplan–Meier, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were implemented.

Results

Of 278 patients satisfying inclusion criteria, 139 (50.0%) underwent chemotherapy alone, 80 (28.8%) underwent chemoradiotherapy, 25 (9.0%) underwent surgical resection + adjuvant chemotherapy, and 34 (12.2%) underwent surgical resection + adjuvant chemoradiotherapy; 5-year OS was 9.4%, 15.2%, 8.3%, and 23.8%, respectively (p < .001). Compared with those not undergoing surgical resection, patients undergoing surgical resection underwent radiotherapy more frequently (57.6% vs. 36.5%) but multiple-agent chemotherapy less frequently (40.7% vs. 74.4%) (p < .005). Twenty-one (36.2%) patients undergoing surgical resection had positive surgical margins. Academic facility (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.19, 95% CI 1.54–6.62) and Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score ≥1 (aOR 2.82, 95% CI 1.25–6.32, p < .025) were associated with increased odds of undergoing surgical resection. Compared with chemotherapy alone, chemoradiotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.56, 95% CI 0.38–0.83) and surgical resection + adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (aHR 0.37, 95% CI 0.21–0.66) were associated with higher OS (p < .005). Immunotherapy (aHR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28–0.81, p = .006) was also independently associated with higher OS.

Conclusion

A minority of patients with cM1 OCSCC underwent primary site surgical resection. Despite the high rate of positive surgical margins, surgical resection + adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was associated with higher OS than chemotherapy alone, chemoradiotherapy, or surgical resection + adjuvant chemotherapy. Definitive local therapy may benefit select patients with cM1 OCSCC.

Level of evidence: 4.

Abstract Image

cM1 口腔鳞状细胞癌的原发部位手术切除
目的 研究临床远处转移性(cM1)口腔鳞状细胞癌(OCSCC)的原发部位手术切除和总生存率(OS)。 方法 对2006-2018年全国癌症数据库中接受化疗的cM1 OCSCC患者进行查询。采用二元逻辑、Kaplan-Meier和多变量Cox比例危险回归模型。 结果 在278名符合纳入标准的患者中,139人(50.0%)接受了单纯化疗,80人(28.8%)接受了化放疗,25人(9.0%)接受了手术切除+辅助化疗,34人(12.2%)接受了手术切除+辅助化放疗;5年OS分别为9.4%、15.2%、8.3%和23.8%(p< .001)。与未接受手术切除的患者相比,接受手术切除的患者接受放疗的比例更高(57.6% 对 36.5%),但接受多药化疗的比例较低(40.7% 对 74.4%)(p < .005)。21例(36.2%)接受手术切除的患者手术切缘呈阳性。学术机构(调整赔率比 [aOR] 3.19,95% CI 1.54-6.62)和 Charlson-Deyo 合并症评分≥1(aOR 2.82,95% CI 1.25-6.32,p < .025)与接受手术切除的几率增加有关。与单纯化疗相比,化放疗(调整后危险比[aHR] 0.56,95% CI 0.38-0.83)和手术切除+辅助化放疗(aHR 0.37,95% CI 0.21-0.66)与较高的OS相关(p < .005)。免疫治疗(aHR 0.48,95% CI 0.28-0.81,p = .006)也与较高的 OS 独立相关。 结论 少数 cM1 OCSCC 患者接受了原发部位手术切除。尽管手术切缘阳性率较高,但与单纯化疗、化放疗或手术切除+辅助化疗相比,手术切除+辅助化放疗与较高的OS相关。确定性局部治疗可使部分cM1 OCSCC患者获益。 证据级别:4.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信