Christina Gallinat , Markus Moessner , Maximilian Wilhelm , Nancy J. Keuthen , Stephanie Bauer
{"title":"Patterns of hair pulling in trichotillomania: An ecological momentary assessment study","authors":"Christina Gallinat , Markus Moessner , Maximilian Wilhelm , Nancy J. Keuthen , Stephanie Bauer","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Trichotillomania (TTM) research lacks an ecologically valid phenomenological description despite increasing research efforts. Previous studies primarily rely on retrospective cross-sectional data, emphasizing the need for longitudinal high-frequency assessments to capture the variability of hair pulling.</p><p>The objective of this study was to describe hair pulling patterns and episode characteristics by means of ecological momentary assessment (EMA), and to compare those parameters between focused and automatic episodes.</p><p>Study procedures included an online screening, a diagnostic interview via telephone, a comprehensive self-report questionnaire and a 10-day EMA-protocol (7 EMAs/day).</p><p>Data from 61 individuals who met diagnostic criteria for TTM (age: <em>M</em> = 29.3, <em>SD</em> = 7.47; 92% female) were analyzed (3948 EMAs; 1217 episodes). Participants reported a mean number of 2.00 (<em>SD</em> = 2.31; range: 0–4.9) episodes per day. One third did not report any days without episodes. Hair pulling showed a relatively even distribution throughout the day. Most prominent triggers were tension and visual/tactile cues. The latter were more relevant in focused episodes, whereas “habit/routine” scored higher in automatic episodes.</p><p>The results suggest that hair pulling occurs not sporadic but is rather present in daily life. Using real-time data from a clinical sample, the study enhances our comprehension of the phenomenology of TTM which may ultimately advance TTM research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100910"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221136492400054X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Trichotillomania (TTM) research lacks an ecologically valid phenomenological description despite increasing research efforts. Previous studies primarily rely on retrospective cross-sectional data, emphasizing the need for longitudinal high-frequency assessments to capture the variability of hair pulling.
The objective of this study was to describe hair pulling patterns and episode characteristics by means of ecological momentary assessment (EMA), and to compare those parameters between focused and automatic episodes.
Study procedures included an online screening, a diagnostic interview via telephone, a comprehensive self-report questionnaire and a 10-day EMA-protocol (7 EMAs/day).
Data from 61 individuals who met diagnostic criteria for TTM (age: M = 29.3, SD = 7.47; 92% female) were analyzed (3948 EMAs; 1217 episodes). Participants reported a mean number of 2.00 (SD = 2.31; range: 0–4.9) episodes per day. One third did not report any days without episodes. Hair pulling showed a relatively even distribution throughout the day. Most prominent triggers were tension and visual/tactile cues. The latter were more relevant in focused episodes, whereas “habit/routine” scored higher in automatic episodes.
The results suggest that hair pulling occurs not sporadic but is rather present in daily life. Using real-time data from a clinical sample, the study enhances our comprehension of the phenomenology of TTM which may ultimately advance TTM research.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders (JOCRD) is an international journal that publishes high quality research and clinically-oriented articles dealing with all aspects of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and related conditions (OC spectrum disorders; e.g., trichotillomania, hoarding, body dysmorphic disorder). The journal invites studies of clinical and non-clinical (i.e., student) samples of all age groups from the fields of psychiatry, psychology, neuroscience, and other medical and health sciences. The journal''s broad focus encompasses classification, assessment, psychological and psychiatric treatment, prevention, psychopathology, neurobiology and genetics. Clinical reports (descriptions of innovative treatment methods) and book reviews on all aspects of OCD-related disorders will be considered, as will theoretical and review articles that make valuable contributions.
Suitable topics for manuscripts include:
-The boundaries of OCD and relationships with OC spectrum disorders
-Validation of assessments of obsessive-compulsive and related phenomena
-OCD symptoms in diverse social and cultural contexts
-Studies of neurobiological and genetic factors in OCD and related conditions
-Experimental and descriptive psychopathology and epidemiological studies
-Studies on relationships among cognitive and behavioral variables in OCD and related disorders
-Interpersonal aspects of OCD and related disorders
-Evaluation of psychological and psychiatric treatment and prevention programs, and predictors of outcome.