Gender differences in prescription misuse intention among university students: Insights from the theory of planned behaviour

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Mohammad Saleem , Touseef Rizvi
{"title":"Gender differences in prescription misuse intention among university students: Insights from the theory of planned behaviour","authors":"Mohammad Saleem ,&nbsp;Touseef Rizvi","doi":"10.1016/j.apnu.2024.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to explore the predictors of prescription misuse intentions among university students using the theory of planned behaviour (TPB), with a particular focus on gender differences in the influence of normative pressure, attitudes, and refusal self-efficacy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional survey design was employed, a total of 597 (males) and 924 (females) aged (15 to 28), university students from three universities of Kashmir Valley (India) participated in the study using purposive sampling. Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) and multi-group analysis were applied to examine the predictors of prescription misuse intentions and Gender-specific differences in these relationships.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The findings revealed that normative pressure (β = 0.419, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and attitudes towards prescription misuse (β = 0.159, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) were positively associated with students' prescription misuse intentions. In contrast, refusal self-efficacy was negatively related to misuse intentions (β = −0.204, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Multi-group analysis showed significant gender differences, particularly in the effect of refusal self-efficacy, with females demonstrating stronger protective effects against misuse (difference = 0.222, <em>p</em> = 0.000). No significant gender differences were found for normative pressure and attitudes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study highlights the importance of addressing both normative pressures and attitudes in reducing prescription misuse intentions, with gender-specific interventions focusing on enhancing refusal self-efficacy, particularly for females. These findings have important implications for developing targeted interventions for university students, including nursing students, where the potential for prescription misuse may be elevated due to academic and social pressures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55466,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Psychiatric Nursing","volume":"53 ","pages":"Pages 1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Psychiatric Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883941724001791","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to explore the predictors of prescription misuse intentions among university students using the theory of planned behaviour (TPB), with a particular focus on gender differences in the influence of normative pressure, attitudes, and refusal self-efficacy.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey design was employed, a total of 597 (males) and 924 (females) aged (15 to 28), university students from three universities of Kashmir Valley (India) participated in the study using purposive sampling. Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) and multi-group analysis were applied to examine the predictors of prescription misuse intentions and Gender-specific differences in these relationships.

Results

The findings revealed that normative pressure (β = 0.419, p < 0.001) and attitudes towards prescription misuse (β = 0.159, p < 0.001) were positively associated with students' prescription misuse intentions. In contrast, refusal self-efficacy was negatively related to misuse intentions (β = −0.204, p < 0.001). Multi-group analysis showed significant gender differences, particularly in the effect of refusal self-efficacy, with females demonstrating stronger protective effects against misuse (difference = 0.222, p = 0.000). No significant gender differences were found for normative pressure and attitudes.

Conclusion

The study highlights the importance of addressing both normative pressures and attitudes in reducing prescription misuse intentions, with gender-specific interventions focusing on enhancing refusal self-efficacy, particularly for females. These findings have important implications for developing targeted interventions for university students, including nursing students, where the potential for prescription misuse may be elevated due to academic and social pressures.

大学生滥用处方药意向的性别差异:计划行为理论的启示
本研究旨在利用计划行为理论(TPB)探讨大学生滥用处方药意向的预测因素,尤其关注规范压力、态度和拒绝自我效能感的性别差异。研究采用横断面调查设计,通过有目的的抽样,共有来自克什米尔山谷(印度)三所大学的 597 名(男性)和 924 名(女性)年龄在 15 至 28 岁之间的大学生参与了研究。研究结果显示,规范压力(β = 0.419,p < 0.001)和对处方滥用的态度(β = 0.159,p < 0.001)与学生的处方滥用意向呈正相关。相反,拒绝自我效能与滥用意向呈负相关(β = -0.204,p < 0.001)。多组分析显示出显著的性别差异,尤其是在拒绝自我效能感的影响方面,女性对滥用具有更强的保护作用(差异 = 0.222,p = 0.000)。结论:该研究强调了应对规范压力和态度对减少处方药滥用意向的重要性,针对不同性别的干预措施侧重于提高拒绝自我效能,尤其是对女性而言。这些发现对于为包括护理专业学生在内的大学生制定有针对性的干预措施具有重要意义,因为在这些学生中,由于学业和社会压力,滥用处方药的可能性可能会升高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
160 days
期刊介绍: Archives of Psychiatric Nursing disseminates original, peer-reviewed research that is of interest to psychiatric and mental health care nurses. The field is considered in its broadest perspective, including theory, practice and research applications related to all ages, special populations, settings, and interdisciplinary collaborations in both the public and private sectors. Through critical study, expositions, and review of practice, Archives of Psychiatric Nursing is a medium for clinical scholarship to provide theoretical linkages among diverse areas of practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信