Weak link or strong foundation? Vulnerability of fine root networks and stems to xylem embolism

IF 8.3 1区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
New Phytologist Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1111/nph.20115
Beatrice L. Harrison Day, Craig R. Brodersen, Timothy J. Brodribb
{"title":"Weak link or strong foundation? Vulnerability of fine root networks and stems to xylem embolism","authors":"Beatrice L. Harrison Day, Craig R. Brodersen, Timothy J. Brodribb","doi":"10.1111/nph.20115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary<jats:list list-type=\"bullet\"> <jats:list-item>Resolving the position of roots in the whole‐plant hierarchy of drought‐induced xylem embolism resistance is fundamental for predicting when species become isolated from soil water resources. Published research generally suggests that roots are the most vulnerable organ of the plant vascular system, although estimates vary significantly. However, our knowledge of root embolism excludes the fine roots (&lt; 2 mm diameter) that form the bulk of total absorptive surface area of the root network for water and nutrient uptake.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>We measured fine root and stem xylem vulnerability in 10 vascular plant species from the major land plant clades (five angiosperms, three conifers, a fern and lycophyte), using standardised <jats:italic>in situ</jats:italic> methods (Optical Methods and MicroCT).</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Mean fine root embolism resistance across the network matched or exceeded stems in all study species. In six of these species (one fern, one lycophyte, three conifers and one angiosperm), fine roots were significantly more embolism resistant than stems. No clear relationship was found between root xylem conduit diameter and vulnerability.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>These results provide insight into the resistance of the plant hydraulic pathway at the site of water and nutrient uptake, and challenge the long‐standing assumption that fine roots are more vulnerable than stems.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":214,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Phytologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20115","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary Resolving the position of roots in the whole‐plant hierarchy of drought‐induced xylem embolism resistance is fundamental for predicting when species become isolated from soil water resources. Published research generally suggests that roots are the most vulnerable organ of the plant vascular system, although estimates vary significantly. However, our knowledge of root embolism excludes the fine roots (< 2 mm diameter) that form the bulk of total absorptive surface area of the root network for water and nutrient uptake. We measured fine root and stem xylem vulnerability in 10 vascular plant species from the major land plant clades (five angiosperms, three conifers, a fern and lycophyte), using standardised in situ methods (Optical Methods and MicroCT). Mean fine root embolism resistance across the network matched or exceeded stems in all study species. In six of these species (one fern, one lycophyte, three conifers and one angiosperm), fine roots were significantly more embolism resistant than stems. No clear relationship was found between root xylem conduit diameter and vulnerability. These results provide insight into the resistance of the plant hydraulic pathway at the site of water and nutrient uptake, and challenge the long‐standing assumption that fine roots are more vulnerable than stems.
薄弱环节还是坚实基础?细根网络和茎易受木质部栓塞的影响
摘要 解决根系在整个植物抗旱木质部栓塞体系中的位置问题,对于预测物种何时脱离土壤水资源至关重要。已发表的研究普遍认为,根系是植物维管系统中最脆弱的器官,但估计值差异很大。然而,我们对根系栓塞的了解并不包括细根(直径 2 毫米),它们构成了根系网络吸收水分和养分的总表面积的大部分。我们采用标准化的原位方法(光学方法和显微CT)测量了来自主要陆生植物支系的10种维管植物(5种被子植物、3种针叶树、1种蕨类植物和1种狼尾草)的细根和茎木质部的脆弱性。在所有研究物种中,整个网络的平均细根栓塞阻力与茎相匹配或超过茎。其中 6 个物种(1 个蕨类植物、1 个狼尾草属植物、3 个针叶树和 1 个被子植物)的细根抗栓塞能力明显高于茎。根木质部导管直径与易栓塞性之间没有明显的关系。这些结果有助于深入了解植物在吸收水分和养分部位的水力通路阻力,并对长期以来认为细根比茎更易受栓塞影响的假设提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New Phytologist
New Phytologist 生物-植物科学
自引率
5.30%
发文量
728
期刊介绍: New Phytologist is an international electronic journal published 24 times a year. It is owned by the New Phytologist Foundation, a non-profit-making charitable organization dedicated to promoting plant science. The journal publishes excellent, novel, rigorous, and timely research and scholarship in plant science and its applications. The articles cover topics in five sections: Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction, Evolution, and Transformative Plant Biotechnology. These sections encompass intracellular processes, global environmental change, and encourage cross-disciplinary approaches. The journal recognizes the use of techniques from molecular and cell biology, functional genomics, modeling, and system-based approaches in plant science. Abstracting and Indexing Information for New Phytologist includes Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Agroforestry Abstracts, Biochemistry & Biophysics Citation Index, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Environment Index, Global Health, and Plant Breeding Abstracts, and others.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信