Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in diabetic and non-diabetic foot infections

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Lawrence A. Lavery, Mario C. Reyes, Mehmet Suludere, Bijan Najafi, Matthew Sideman, Michael C. Siah, Arthur N. Tarricone
{"title":"Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in diabetic and non-diabetic foot infections","authors":"Lawrence A. Lavery,&nbsp;Mario C. Reyes,&nbsp;Mehmet Suludere,&nbsp;Bijan Najafi,&nbsp;Matthew Sideman,&nbsp;Michael C. Siah,&nbsp;Arthur N. Tarricone","doi":"10.1111/iwj.70039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To identify the incidence of methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) infection, reinfection and clinical outcomes. Four hundred forty-six patients that were admitted to the hospital with moderate or severe foot infections were retrospectively reviewed. Tissue and bone cultures were obtained from the index hospital admission. Conversion was defined as methicillin susceptible <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> in the first culture and subsequently MRSA when there was a reinfection. The incidence of MRSA was 7.8% (<i>n</i> = 35), with no significant difference between soft tissue infections (7.7%) and osteomyelitis (8.0%). MRSA incidence was 9.4 times higher in non-diabetics (23.8% vs. 3.2%, <i>p</i> = &lt;0.01). The incidence of reinfection was 40.8% (<i>n</i> = 182). Conversion to MRSA was seen in 2.2% (<i>n</i> = 4) total, occurring in 5.4%. Non-diabetics were 20.1 times more likely to have MRSA reinfection than people with diabetes (28.6% vs. 1.9%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). MRSA patients had a higher proportion of healed wounds (82.4% vs. 69.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.02). There were no differences in other clinical outcomes in MRSA vs. other infections in reinfection (28.6% vs. 24.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.11), amputation (48.6% vs. 52.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.69) or hospitalization (28.6% vs. 42.6, <i>p</i> = 0.11). The incidence of MRSA for the first infection (7.8%), reinfection (6.0%) and conversion to MRSA (2.2%) was low. MRSA was 9.4 times more common in people without diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14451,"journal":{"name":"International Wound Journal","volume":"21 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/iwj.70039","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Wound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iwj.70039","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To identify the incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection, reinfection and clinical outcomes. Four hundred forty-six patients that were admitted to the hospital with moderate or severe foot infections were retrospectively reviewed. Tissue and bone cultures were obtained from the index hospital admission. Conversion was defined as methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in the first culture and subsequently MRSA when there was a reinfection. The incidence of MRSA was 7.8% (n = 35), with no significant difference between soft tissue infections (7.7%) and osteomyelitis (8.0%). MRSA incidence was 9.4 times higher in non-diabetics (23.8% vs. 3.2%, p = <0.01). The incidence of reinfection was 40.8% (n = 182). Conversion to MRSA was seen in 2.2% (n = 4) total, occurring in 5.4%. Non-diabetics were 20.1 times more likely to have MRSA reinfection than people with diabetes (28.6% vs. 1.9%, p < 0.001). MRSA patients had a higher proportion of healed wounds (82.4% vs. 69.3%, p = 0.02). There were no differences in other clinical outcomes in MRSA vs. other infections in reinfection (28.6% vs. 24.3%, p = 0.11), amputation (48.6% vs. 52.0%, p = 0.69) or hospitalization (28.6% vs. 42.6, p = 0.11). The incidence of MRSA for the first infection (7.8%), reinfection (6.0%) and conversion to MRSA (2.2%) was low. MRSA was 9.4 times more common in people without diabetes.

Abstract Image

糖尿病足和非糖尿病足感染中的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌
目的:确定耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染、再感染和临床结果的发生率。对入院的 446 名中度或重度足部感染患者进行回顾性研究。组织和骨培养取自入院时的指标。首次培养出对甲氧西林敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌即为转阴,再次感染时则为 MRSA。MRSA发病率为7.8%(n = 35),软组织感染(7.7%)和骨髓炎(8.0%)之间无明显差异。非糖尿病患者的 MRSA 感染率比糖尿病患者高出 9.4 倍(23.8% 对 3.2%,P = 0.01)。再感染发生率为 40.8%(n = 182)。转为 MRSA 的比例为 2.2%(n = 4),发生率为 5.4%。非糖尿病患者再次感染 MRSA 的几率是糖尿病患者的 20.1 倍(28.6% 对 1.9%,P < 0.001)。MRSA患者伤口愈合的比例更高(82.4% 对 69.3%,p = 0.02)。在再感染(28.6% 对 24.3%,p = 0.11)、截肢(48.6% 对 52.0%,p = 0.69)或住院(28.6% 对 42.6,p = 0.11)方面,MRSA 与其他感染的其他临床结果没有差异。首次感染(7.8%)、再次感染(6.0%)和转为 MRSA(2.2%)的 MRSA 发生率较低。MRSA在非糖尿病患者中的发病率是普通患者的9.4倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Wound Journal
International Wound Journal DERMATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.90%
发文量
266
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Editors welcome papers on all aspects of prevention and treatment of wounds and associated conditions in the fields of surgery, dermatology, oncology, nursing, radiotherapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy and podiatry. The Journal accepts papers in the following categories: - Research papers - Review articles - Clinical studies - Letters - News and Views: international perspectives, education initiatives, guidelines and different activities of groups and societies. Calendar of events The Editors are supported by a board of international experts and a panel of reviewers across a range of disciplines and specialties which ensures only the most current and relevant research is published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信