Globally convergent path-aware optimization with mobile robots

IF 3.7 2区 计算机科学 Q2 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
T. Sântejudean , Ş. Ungur , R. Herzal , I.-C. Morărescu , V.S. Varma , L. Buşoniu
{"title":"Globally convergent path-aware optimization with mobile robots","authors":"T. Sântejudean ,&nbsp;Ş. Ungur ,&nbsp;R. Herzal ,&nbsp;I.-C. Morărescu ,&nbsp;V.S. Varma ,&nbsp;L. Buşoniu","doi":"10.1016/j.nahs.2024.101546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Consider a mobile robot that must navigate as quickly as possible to the global maxima of a function (e.g. density of seabed litter, pollutant concentration, wireless signal strength) defined over its operating area. This objective function is initially unknown and is assumed to be Lipschitz continuous. The limited velocity of the robot restricts the next samples to neighboring positions, and to avoid wasting time and energy, the robot’s path must be adapted as new information becomes available. The paper proposes two methods that use an upper bound on the objective to iteratively change the position targeted by the robot as new samples are acquired. The first method is FTW, which Turns When the best value seen so far of the objective Function is larger than the bound of the current target position. The second is FTWD, an extension of FTW that takes into account the Distance to the target. Convergence guarantees are provided for both methods, and a convergence rate is proven to characterize how fast the FTW suboptimality decreases as the number of samples grows. In a numerical study, FTWD greatly improves performance compared to FTW, outperforms two representative source-seeking baselines, and obtains results similar to a much more computationally intensive method that does not guarantee convergence. The relationship between FTW and FTWD is also confirmed in real-robot experiments, where a TurtleBot3 seeks the darkest point on a 2D grayscale map.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49011,"journal":{"name":"Nonlinear Analysis-Hybrid Systems","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101546"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751570X24000839/pdfft?md5=fa25eec126f2b4af5ecf2f2391974551&pid=1-s2.0-S1751570X24000839-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nonlinear Analysis-Hybrid Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751570X24000839","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consider a mobile robot that must navigate as quickly as possible to the global maxima of a function (e.g. density of seabed litter, pollutant concentration, wireless signal strength) defined over its operating area. This objective function is initially unknown and is assumed to be Lipschitz continuous. The limited velocity of the robot restricts the next samples to neighboring positions, and to avoid wasting time and energy, the robot’s path must be adapted as new information becomes available. The paper proposes two methods that use an upper bound on the objective to iteratively change the position targeted by the robot as new samples are acquired. The first method is FTW, which Turns When the best value seen so far of the objective Function is larger than the bound of the current target position. The second is FTWD, an extension of FTW that takes into account the Distance to the target. Convergence guarantees are provided for both methods, and a convergence rate is proven to characterize how fast the FTW suboptimality decreases as the number of samples grows. In a numerical study, FTWD greatly improves performance compared to FTW, outperforms two representative source-seeking baselines, and obtains results similar to a much more computationally intensive method that does not guarantee convergence. The relationship between FTW and FTWD is also confirmed in real-robot experiments, where a TurtleBot3 seeks the darkest point on a 2D grayscale map.

利用移动机器人进行全局收敛路径感知优化
考虑一个移动机器人,它必须尽可能快地航行到一个函数(如海底垃圾密度、污染物浓度、无线信号强度)的全球最大值,该函数定义在其运行区域内。该目标函数最初是未知的,并假定为 Lipschitz 连续函数。由于机器人的速度有限,下一次采样只能在邻近位置进行,为了避免浪费时间和精力,机器人的路径必须在获得新信息时进行调整。本文提出了两种方法,在获取新样本时,利用目标上界迭代改变机器人的目标位置。第一种方法是 FTW,当目前看到的目标函数的最佳值大于当前目标位置的边界时,机器人就会改变目标位置。第二种是 FTWD,它是 FTW 的扩展,考虑了与目标的距离。这两种方法都提供了收敛保证,并证明了收敛速率,以表征 FTW 次优性随着样本数量的增加而降低的速度。在数值研究中,与 FTW 相比,FTWD 极大地提高了性能,优于两种具有代表性的寻源基线,并获得了与计算量更大但不能保证收敛的方法类似的结果。FTW 和 FTWD 之间的关系在实际机器人实验中也得到了证实,TurtleBot3 在二维灰度地图上寻找最暗的点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nonlinear Analysis-Hybrid Systems
Nonlinear Analysis-Hybrid Systems AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS-MATHEMATICS, APPLIED
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems welcomes all important research and expository papers in any discipline. Papers that are principally concerned with the theory of hybrid systems should contain significant results indicating relevant applications. Papers that emphasize applications should consist of important real world models and illuminating techniques. Papers that interrelate various aspects of hybrid systems will be most welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信