Occupational class inequalities in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in Norwegian men and women: a population-based approach with 45 years follow-up

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
{"title":"Occupational class inequalities in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in Norwegian men and women: a population-based approach with 45 years follow-up","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2024.07.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study assessed associations of three theoretically different occupational class schemes with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in Norwegian men and women.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Pooled survey and register data from four Norwegian cohort studies.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We pooled survey data from four general population cohorts (<em>N</em> = 97,469) linked to national mortality registries with follow-up over 45 years. Survival was modelled using accelerated failure time models stratified by sex for three class schemes: The European Socio-Economic Classification (ESeC), The Oslo Register Data Class scheme (ORDC) and The International Socio-Economic Index (ISEI). Main analyses were adjusted for age, birth cohort, and study. Secondary analyses included smoking behaviour as a mediator.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During median 27.6 years of observation, 37,488 participants had died (13,243 from cardiovascular disease). Hazard ratios for male all-cause mortality were lowest in the highest occupational class categories ORDC 2: 0.68 (0.65–0.72), ESeC 1: 0.76 (0.73–0.79) and ISEI 5th quintile: 0.80 (0.77–0.82) compared to working class reference categories. Female mortality risks were lowest for Cultural Lower Middle class ORDC 7: 0.84 (0.72–0.98), Small Employers and Self-employed ESeC4: 0.70 (0.50–0.97) and ISEI 5th quintile: 0.79 (0.70–0.90). Patterns for cardiovascular mortality were similar to all-cause mortality. Including smoking behaviour as a mediator attenuated associations, but overall mortality patterns according to occupational class remained unchanged.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results underline that mortality inequalities do not simply consist of higher risks in the most disadvantaged groups. The association of occupational class with mortality is found across different categories of occupational class schemes, illustrating their continued relevance for studying social determinants of health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350624003457/pdfft?md5=1222c8e4653a0cc0767f6306f4caac82&pid=1-s2.0-S0033350624003457-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350624003457","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study assessed associations of three theoretically different occupational class schemes with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in Norwegian men and women.

Study design

Pooled survey and register data from four Norwegian cohort studies.

Methods

We pooled survey data from four general population cohorts (N = 97,469) linked to national mortality registries with follow-up over 45 years. Survival was modelled using accelerated failure time models stratified by sex for three class schemes: The European Socio-Economic Classification (ESeC), The Oslo Register Data Class scheme (ORDC) and The International Socio-Economic Index (ISEI). Main analyses were adjusted for age, birth cohort, and study. Secondary analyses included smoking behaviour as a mediator.

Results

During median 27.6 years of observation, 37,488 participants had died (13,243 from cardiovascular disease). Hazard ratios for male all-cause mortality were lowest in the highest occupational class categories ORDC 2: 0.68 (0.65–0.72), ESeC 1: 0.76 (0.73–0.79) and ISEI 5th quintile: 0.80 (0.77–0.82) compared to working class reference categories. Female mortality risks were lowest for Cultural Lower Middle class ORDC 7: 0.84 (0.72–0.98), Small Employers and Self-employed ESeC4: 0.70 (0.50–0.97) and ISEI 5th quintile: 0.79 (0.70–0.90). Patterns for cardiovascular mortality were similar to all-cause mortality. Including smoking behaviour as a mediator attenuated associations, but overall mortality patterns according to occupational class remained unchanged.

Conclusion

The results underline that mortality inequalities do not simply consist of higher risks in the most disadvantaged groups. The association of occupational class with mortality is found across different categories of occupational class schemes, illustrating their continued relevance for studying social determinants of health.

挪威男女全因死亡率和心血管死亡率中的职业等级不平等:基于人口的 45 年跟踪方法
研究设计汇集了来自四项挪威队列研究的调查和登记数据。方法我们汇集了来自四项普通人群队列(N = 97,469)的调查数据,这些数据与随访时间超过 45 年的国家死亡率登记相联系。我们使用加速衰竭时间模型对三个等级方案进行了性别分层:欧洲社会经济分类 (ESeC)、奥斯陆登记数据分类计划 (ORDC) 和国际社会经济指数 (ISEI)。主要分析对年龄、出生队列和研究进行了调整。结果在中位 27.6 年的观察期间,37,488 名参与者死亡(13,243 人死于心血管疾病)。与工人阶级参考类别相比,男性全因死亡率的危险比在最高职业类别 ORDC 2:0.68(0.65-0.72)、ESeC 1:0.76(0.73-0.79)和 ISEI 第 5 五分位数:0.80(0.77-0.82)中最低。女性死亡风险最低的是文化中下层 ORDC 7:0.84(0.72-0.98),小雇主和自营职业者 ESeC4:0.70(0.50-0.97),ISEI 第 5 个五分位数:0.79(0.70-0.90)。心血管疾病死亡率的模式与全因死亡率相似。将吸烟行为作为中介因素削弱了相关性,但根据职业等级划分的总体死亡率模式保持不变。在不同类别的职业等级计划中都发现了职业等级与死亡率之间的关联,这说明职业等级计划对于研究健康的社会决定因素仍然具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信