Vortioxetine versus reuptake inhibitors in adults with major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract

Background

Although vortioxetine demonstrates superior efficacy relative to placebo, there is still a lack of robust evidence to determine whether it offers advantages over commonly prescribed antidepressants for treating major depressive disorder (MDD). Thus, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing vortioxetine vs reuptake inhibitors in adults with MDD, analyzing two classes separately: (i) vortioxetine vs SSRIs and (ii) vortioxetine vs SNRIs.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials comparing vortioxetine with SSRIs or SNRIs in adults with a primary diagnosis of MDD following standardized diagnostic criteria. Independent examiners conducted the literature search, study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Data were pooled in random-effects analyses. Statistical significance was considered at p<0.05.

Results

We included 6 trials (n=478) in the vortioxetine vs SSRIs analysis and 11 (n=4230) in the vortioxetine vs SNRIs analysis. There were no significant differences between vortioxetine and SSRIs/SNRIs in the probability of response, remission, overall dropouts, and dropout due to lack of efficacy. Vortioxetine provided a significantly lower risk of dropout due to adverse events compared with SNRIs, while not significant compared with SSRIs. Vortioxetine did not differ significantly from SNRIs regarding variation in MADRS score post-treatment. In general, vortioxetine exhibited a statistically lower risk of individual adverse events compared with SNRIs, while not significant compared with SSRIs.

Conclusions

Our study reveals that vortioxetine is as effective as SSRIs and SNRIs for treating MDD, with safety equivalent to SSRIs and superior to SNRIs.