Evaluation of fluid mobility and factors influencing the deep tight sandstone of the third member of the Shahejie formation in the Jiyang depression, Bohai Bay Basin

IF 3.7 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Yuchao Wang , Dongxia Chen , Lanxi Rong , Jialing Chen , Fuwei Wang , Shijie He , Yuqi Wang , Zijie Yang , Wenzhi Lei
{"title":"Evaluation of fluid mobility and factors influencing the deep tight sandstone of the third member of the Shahejie formation in the Jiyang depression, Bohai Bay Basin","authors":"Yuchao Wang ,&nbsp;Dongxia Chen ,&nbsp;Lanxi Rong ,&nbsp;Jialing Chen ,&nbsp;Fuwei Wang ,&nbsp;Shijie He ,&nbsp;Yuqi Wang ,&nbsp;Zijie Yang ,&nbsp;Wenzhi Lei","doi":"10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2024.107090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Paleogene lacustrine delta–turbidite facies sandstones of the Third Member of the Shahejie Formation (Es<sub>3</sub>) in the Linnan Depression have abundant tight oil resources. Movable fluids can independently characterize reservoir fluid mobility and recovery efficiency, which are essential for accurate reservoir assessment and efficient development and evaluation of oil reservoirs. Systematic research on the distribution patterns and controlling factors of movable fluids in the tight sandstone reservoirs of the Linnan Depression is lacking. To address this gap, this study employs multi-gradient centrifugation combined with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) to characterize fluid mobility and determine the lower limit of the movable fluid pore radius (LLMPR) in various lithofacies of lacustrine delta-turbidite facies sandstones. In conjunction with core descriptions, thin section observations, X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, gas permeability tests, and High-pressure mercury injection (HPMI) data, this research explicates the macroscopic impacts of depositional and diagenetic processes and the microscopic effects of pore structure on fluid movability. The study identifies four lithofacies (delta front facies massive siltstone (DFMS)、delta front facies laminated siltstone (DFLS)、slump turbidite facies siltstone (STS), and slump turbidite facies calcareous siltstone (STCS)) with corresponding pore structures and space types (I-micropores, II-micropores, mesopores, macropores). DFLS and DFMS feature well-developed primary intergranular and intragranular dissolution pores, high HPMI mercury intrusion saturation, and large average pore radius, primarily contributing to fluid mobility through mesopores and macropores with movable fluid saturation of 56.1% and 52.9%, respectively. In contrast, STS and STCS mainly comprise mesopores and micropores with lower movable fluid saturation of 33.5% and 27.5%, influenced by clay filling and carbonate cementation, resulting in poor connectivity. Macroscopically, better-sorted delta-front sand bodies develop connected pores within rigid quartz and feldspar particle frameworks, increasing the proportion of mesopores and macropores. Microscopically, reservoir properties, RQI, maximum invasion saturation, displacement pressure, and average pore radius significantly influence fluid movability. As centrifugal force increases, fluid output from pores slows, and the LLMPR decreases exponentially. At an optimal centrifugal force of 2.75 MPa, the LLMPR in the Linnan Depression is calculated to be 0.033 μm. Based on these insights, a fluid mobility model for lacustrine delta front-turbidite facies tight sandstones is established, identifying DFMS and DFLS as the optimal lithofacies for movable fluids. This study provides theoretical references for understanding and effectively developing deep tight sandstone reservoirs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18189,"journal":{"name":"Marine and Petroleum Geology","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 107090"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine and Petroleum Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264817224004021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Paleogene lacustrine delta–turbidite facies sandstones of the Third Member of the Shahejie Formation (Es3) in the Linnan Depression have abundant tight oil resources. Movable fluids can independently characterize reservoir fluid mobility and recovery efficiency, which are essential for accurate reservoir assessment and efficient development and evaluation of oil reservoirs. Systematic research on the distribution patterns and controlling factors of movable fluids in the tight sandstone reservoirs of the Linnan Depression is lacking. To address this gap, this study employs multi-gradient centrifugation combined with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) to characterize fluid mobility and determine the lower limit of the movable fluid pore radius (LLMPR) in various lithofacies of lacustrine delta-turbidite facies sandstones. In conjunction with core descriptions, thin section observations, X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, gas permeability tests, and High-pressure mercury injection (HPMI) data, this research explicates the macroscopic impacts of depositional and diagenetic processes and the microscopic effects of pore structure on fluid movability. The study identifies four lithofacies (delta front facies massive siltstone (DFMS)、delta front facies laminated siltstone (DFLS)、slump turbidite facies siltstone (STS), and slump turbidite facies calcareous siltstone (STCS)) with corresponding pore structures and space types (I-micropores, II-micropores, mesopores, macropores). DFLS and DFMS feature well-developed primary intergranular and intragranular dissolution pores, high HPMI mercury intrusion saturation, and large average pore radius, primarily contributing to fluid mobility through mesopores and macropores with movable fluid saturation of 56.1% and 52.9%, respectively. In contrast, STS and STCS mainly comprise mesopores and micropores with lower movable fluid saturation of 33.5% and 27.5%, influenced by clay filling and carbonate cementation, resulting in poor connectivity. Macroscopically, better-sorted delta-front sand bodies develop connected pores within rigid quartz and feldspar particle frameworks, increasing the proportion of mesopores and macropores. Microscopically, reservoir properties, RQI, maximum invasion saturation, displacement pressure, and average pore radius significantly influence fluid movability. As centrifugal force increases, fluid output from pores slows, and the LLMPR decreases exponentially. At an optimal centrifugal force of 2.75 MPa, the LLMPR in the Linnan Depression is calculated to be 0.033 μm. Based on these insights, a fluid mobility model for lacustrine delta front-turbidite facies tight sandstones is established, identifying DFMS and DFLS as the optimal lithofacies for movable fluids. This study provides theoretical references for understanding and effectively developing deep tight sandstone reservoirs.

渤海湾盆地济阳凹陷沙河街地层第三系深部致密砂岩流体流动性及影响因素评价
临南凹陷沙河街地层第三系(Es3)古近纪湖相三角洲-浊积砂岩具有丰富的致密油资源。可移动流体可以独立地表征储层流体的流动性和采收率,对于准确评估储层、高效开发和评价油藏至关重要。目前还缺乏对林南凹陷致密砂岩储层中可移动流体分布模式和控制因素的系统研究。针对这一空白,本研究采用多梯度离心法结合核磁共振(NMR)技术,描述流体流动性特征,并确定湖相三角洲浊积砂岩各岩相中可移动流体孔隙半径(LLMPR)的下限。结合岩芯描述、薄片观察、X 射线衍射(XRD)分析、气体渗透性测试和高压汞注入(HPMI)数据,该研究阐述了沉积和成岩过程的宏观影响以及孔隙结构对流体流动性的微观影响。研究确定了四种岩性(三角洲前缘面块状粉砂岩(DFMS)、三角洲前缘面层状粉砂岩(DFLS)、坍塌浊积岩面粉砂岩(STS)和坍塌浊积岩面钙质粉砂岩(STCS)),并确定了相应的孔隙结构和空间类型(I-微孔、II-微孔、中孔、大孔)。DFLS 和 DFMS 具有发达的原生粒间和粒内溶孔、较高的 HPMI 汞侵入饱和度和较大的平均孔隙半径,主要通过中孔和大孔促进流体的流动,其可移动流体饱和度分别为 56.1% 和 52.9%。相比之下,STS 和 STCS 主要由中孔和微孔组成,受粘土填充和碳酸盐胶结的影响,可移动流体饱和度较低,分别为 33.5% 和 27.5%,因此连通性较差。从宏观上看,分选较好的三角洲前缘砂体在坚硬的石英和长石颗粒框架内形成连通孔隙,增加了中孔和大孔隙的比例。从微观上看,储层性质、RQI、最大入侵饱和度、位移压力和平均孔隙半径对流体流动性有重大影响。随着离心力的增加,孔隙中流体的输出速度减慢,LLMPR呈指数下降。在 2.75 兆帕的最佳离心力下,计算得出林南凹陷的 LLMPR 为 0.033 μm。基于这些认识,建立了湖相三角洲前缘-浊积岩面致密砂岩的流体流动模型,确定了DFMS和DFLS为最佳的可移动流体岩性。该研究为理解和有效开发深层致密砂岩储层提供了理论参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Marine and Petroleum Geology
Marine and Petroleum Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
475
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Marine and Petroleum Geology is the pre-eminent international forum for the exchange of multidisciplinary concepts, interpretations and techniques for all concerned with marine and petroleum geology in industry, government and academia. Rapid bimonthly publication allows early communications of papers or short communications to the geoscience community. Marine and Petroleum Geology is essential reading for geologists, geophysicists and explorationists in industry, government and academia working in the following areas: marine geology; basin analysis and evaluation; organic geochemistry; reserve/resource estimation; seismic stratigraphy; thermal models of basic evolution; sedimentary geology; continental margins; geophysical interpretation; structural geology/tectonics; formation evaluation techniques; well logging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信