Alice C. Schwarze, Jessica Jiang, Jonny Wray, Mason A. Porter
{"title":"Structural Robustness and Vulnerability of Networks","authors":"Alice C. Schwarze, Jessica Jiang, Jonny Wray, Mason A. Porter","doi":"arxiv-2409.07498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Networks are useful descriptions of the structure of many complex systems.\nUnsurprisingly, it is thus important to analyze the robustness of networks in\nmany scientific disciplines. In applications in communication, logistics,\nfinance, ecology, biomedicine, and many other fields, researchers have studied\nthe robustness of networks to the removal of nodes, edges, or other subnetworks\nto identify and characterize robust network structures. A major challenge in\nthe study of network robustness is that researchers have reported that\ndifferent and seemingly contradictory network properties are correlated with a\nnetwork's robustness. Using a framework by Alderson and\nDoyle~\\cite{Alderson2010}, we categorize several notions of network robustness\nand we examine these ostensible contradictions. We survey studies of network\nrobustness with a focus on (1)~identifying robustness specifications in common\nuse, (2)~understanding when these specifications are appropriate, and\n(3)~understanding the conditions under which one can expect different notions\nof robustness to yield similar results. With this review, we aim to give\nresearchers an overview of the large, interdisciplinary body of work on network\nrobustness and develop practical guidance for the design of computational\nexperiments to study a network's robustness.","PeriodicalId":501043,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics and Society","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07498","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Networks are useful descriptions of the structure of many complex systems.
Unsurprisingly, it is thus important to analyze the robustness of networks in
many scientific disciplines. In applications in communication, logistics,
finance, ecology, biomedicine, and many other fields, researchers have studied
the robustness of networks to the removal of nodes, edges, or other subnetworks
to identify and characterize robust network structures. A major challenge in
the study of network robustness is that researchers have reported that
different and seemingly contradictory network properties are correlated with a
network's robustness. Using a framework by Alderson and
Doyle~\cite{Alderson2010}, we categorize several notions of network robustness
and we examine these ostensible contradictions. We survey studies of network
robustness with a focus on (1)~identifying robustness specifications in common
use, (2)~understanding when these specifications are appropriate, and
(3)~understanding the conditions under which one can expect different notions
of robustness to yield similar results. With this review, we aim to give
researchers an overview of the large, interdisciplinary body of work on network
robustness and develop practical guidance for the design of computational
experiments to study a network's robustness.